China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) on Wednesday criticized the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government for initiating a one-year restriction on Shanghai-based social platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書, also known as RedNote in English), describing the ban as “anti-democratic” and claiming it deprives Taiwanese of their rights and freedom to access the app.
TAO spokesman Chen Binhua (陳斌華) made the remarks at a news conference in Beijing, in which his answers to other reporters’ questions on the issue highlighted the Chinese government’s constant self-contradictory statements and exposed the lies that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has repeated to the Taiwanese public.
Chen said Xiaohongshu is a popular social media platform among Taiwanese, who use it to understand Chinese society and engage in friendly interactions with Chinese users, but DPP authorities are deliberately creating an “information cocoon.” He said the ban was imposed under the pretense of preventing fraud, but is actually aimed at blocking mutual understanding and exchanges between young people in Taiwan and China. He used wordplay to satirize the DPP as the “ban-the-people party,” for its restrictions on Chinese e-commerce and social media sites.
However, Chen froze for a few seconds when a Central News Agency (CNA) reporter asked about Chinese having to bypass China’s “Great Firewall” to access Western social media, and whether the government would consider allowing them access to Facebook, as the TAO and other Chinese government agencies have accounts on the platform. He eventually responded that his government supports the use of all kinds of social media in accordance with Chinese laws and regulations, adding that China puts its citizens first, lawfully combats telecom fraud and criminal activities, and safeguards the lives, property and rights of Chinese.
His remarks seem almost comical, given China’s Internet censorship, and as the “Great Firewall” creates one of the world’s most infamous “information cocoons” to limit and filter what Chinese can access and see online. Also, “democracy” and “freedom” have never been associated with the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) one-party authoritarian regime, although it frequently claims such values in its official discourse and documents.
What can be posted on Chinese social media is strictly monitored, and so-called nonpolitical content on Xiaohongshu has been meticulously curated under the government’s comprehensive and stringent surveillance rules and the self-censorship culture in China. Lifestyle content must align with state-approved ideology, and posts perceived as “socially undesirable” or “potentially sensitive” are removed.
Meanwhile, Chen’s reply to another question by the CNA reporter inadvertently exposed lies that KMT politicians have often used to mislead the public. The reporter asked if the TAO would request that its affiliate the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits assist Xiaohongshu in communicating with Taiwanese authorities, as requests to submit anti-fraud improvement plans submitted through the Straits Exchange Foundation were not met with a reply.
Chen said that because the DPP administration refuses to accept the so-called “1992 consensus that embodies the one China principle,” the communication mechanism between the foundation and the association had been suspended.
The Chinese government has repeatedly and on many occasions stressed its “one China” principle. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) on Tuesday last week told his German counterpart that “there is no room for ambiguity” on the position, and in China’s policy paper on Latin America and the Caribbean released on Wednesday last week, it again said “Taiwan is an inalienable part of China’s territory, and the government of the PRC [People’s Republic of China] is the sole legal government representing the whole of China.”
Chen’s response clearly debunked the KMT’s claim that the so-called “1992-consensus” is an understanding between the KMT and the CCP with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means, because Beijing explicitly reiterated that “China” only has one meaning — the PRC.
It also revealed the KMT’s lies about “the DPP refusing to communicate with China,” while raising questions about how the KMT can work with China, as it claims, without accepting Beijing’s “one China” precondition.
Many KMT politicians and some so-called pacifists have accused the DPP of being unwilling to communicate with Beijing and “provoking” China to take hostile actions. However, the premise of accepting Beijing’s “one China” principle for talks with China’s leaders is concerning and should be closely scrutinized.
An elderly mother and her daughter were found dead in Kaohsiung after having not been seen for several days, discovered only when a foul odor began to spread and drew neighbors’ attention. There have been many similar cases, but it is particularly troubling that some of the victims were excluded from the social welfare safety net because they did not meet eligibility criteria. According to media reports, the middle-aged daughter had sought help from the local borough warden. Although the warden did step in, many services were unavailable without out-of-pocket payments due to issues with eligibility, leaving the warden’s hands
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
Taiwan last week finally reached a trade agreement with the US, reducing tariffs on Taiwanese goods to 15 percent, without stacking them on existing levies, from the 20 percent rate announced by US President Donald Trump’s administration in August last year. Taiwan also became the first country to secure most-favored-nation treatment for semiconductor and related suppliers under Section 232 of the US Trade Expansion Act. In return, Taiwanese chipmakers, electronics manufacturing service providers and other technology companies would invest US$250 billion in the US, while the government would provide credit guarantees of up to US$250 billion to support Taiwanese firms
Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesman Randhir Jaiswal told a news conference on Jan. 9, in response to China’s latest round of live-fire exercises in the Taiwan Strait: “India has an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our trade, economic, people-to-people and maritime interests. We urge all parties to exercise restraint, avoid unilateral actions and resolve issues peacefully without threat or use of force.” The statement set a firm tone at the beginning of the year for India-Taiwan relations, and reflects New Delhi’s recognition of shared interests and the strategic importance of regional stability. While India
RSS