The government on Thursday last week finally imposed a one-year ban on the Chinese social media app Xiaohongshu (小紅書, also known as RedNote in English), with the justification being that the platform has no legal presence in Taiwan. When scammers exploit it, the government has no way to contact the company that owns the China-based app to address such issues — because it does not recognize Taiwan’s sovereignty in the first place.
During China’s Cultural Revolution, the term xiaohongshu — which directly translates to “little red book” in English — referred to a compilation of quotations from Mao Zedong (毛澤東). The pocket-sized book got its name because it was wrapped in a red plastic cover. Everyone owned a copy at the time, and each of the Chinese Red Guards carried one at all times — using it to cheer Mao or brandishing it as a weapon when fighting their enemies. Thus, when I saw that China had named a social media platform “Xiaohongshu,” I immediately understood the kind of message they were trying to sell.
During the years I spent in Hong Kong, my work centered on criticizing the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and Mao. I did not want young people to be deceived by the CCP the way I once was — only to look back and realize that decades had already gone by. Later, the situation was different. Former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) crafted the ruse of “reform and opening up,” and at the time, we truly hoped that it could transform the CCP’s nature. It was not until after the Tiananmen Square Massacre that we gradually gave up hope.
Today, our relationship with the CCP is no longer the stark opposition and mutual estrangement of two political camps that existed previously — instead, it is a complex, intertwined relationship. The Internet has only further complicated the situation.
To protect the interests of its regime, the CCP is extremely sensitive about the Internet. In the late 20th century, Jiang Mianheng (江綿恆) — the son of former Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) — who had just entered the telecommunications sector, said that China must build an independent Internet system that does not rely on the outside world.
US media praised him at the time, and US tech companies such as Cisco Systems Inc and Intel Corp helped China build its own telecommunications network. Once the job was done, China gradually forced all of those US companies out. Platforms such as Facebook were never allowed to enter the Chinese market and Google was forced out — now, it is Microsoft’s turn.
Our social media platforms are meant for communication between people, but China bans them and only allows its own. Meanwhile, it has built platforms such as TikTok and Xiaohongshu to enter other countries and brainwash their citizens, pushing them to accept China’s positions and viewpoints. These tactics are not direct — they are packaged with entertainment, and political messaging is inserted only at critical moments so users end up subconsciously accepting it.
This is a war without gunpowder. By the time you notice it, all you can do is scramble to disinfect and patch the leaks. As some members of the public have already grown used to these platforms and believe they represent freedom of speech, it is impossible to shut things down directly as China does. We are on the defensive in this war, constantly taking hits with no way to counterattack — all while dressing it up as “democratic confidence.”
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has spoken of the “Four Confidences” in socialism, communism, the party monopoly and “socialist culture.” If he is so confident, why does he still need to block us, while we are barred from blocking them? If the reason is that China is an authoritarian state, then why should Taiwan ever unify with it?
When Western countries do business with China, they must use Chinese platforms, such as the networking app WeChat or Chinese e-mail services. Yet when Chinese people do business with foreign countries, they get to use those same Chinese platforms. Why has the Western world tolerated this asymmetry for so long? We remain so intoxicated by the superiority of democracy that when the time comes, we would not even realize what led to its demise.
In US President Donald Trump’s tariff war against China, should he establish equal footing in social media relations, or should he sacrifice his country’s Internet sovereignty for the sake of economic interests?
Paul Lin is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
RSS