The devastating fire at the Wang Fuk Court housing complex in Tai Po, Hong Kong, resulted in at least 159 deaths, with dozens still missing. The several subtle incidents that followed the tragedy revealed the top priority of the Hong Kong Government and the authorities in Beijing in responding to the disaster — maintaining the stability of the regime. The rights and interests of Hong Kong residents have been all but sidelined.
For Taiwanese, who are accustomed to democracy and freedom, this should serve as an urgent warning — especially now that some have even proposed the insidious notion of “one country, two regions.”
After the disaster, students in Hong Kong attempted to launch an online petition that outlined their demands: continued support and proper resettlement for residents impacted by the fire, the establishment of an independent investigative committee to probe possible corruption and full government accountability.
For Taiwanese, such demands are completely justified, typical of everyday democratic practice, but that is not the case in Hong Kong.
The person responsible for initiating the petition, 24-year-old Miles Kwan (關靖豐), was immediately arrested by Hong Kong’s national security police on suspicion of “sedition.” A former legislator who shared the online petition was also arrested, accused of “stirring hatred.”
Expressing demands in response to major social events is a right protected in Taiwan, but in Hong Kong, it has become a criminal act that puts one in danger of arrest and prosecution.
Do Taiwanese truly want to be ruled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and live such a life? If the CCP were to govern Taiwan or a “one country, two regions” framework was actually adopted, simply expressing opinions, or raising demands after major disasters or regarding large-scale energy projects could result in an arrest.
Would Taiwanese ever get used to that?
The Wang Fuk Court fire is littered with suspicious circumstances. Before even determining the cause of the incident, the Hong Kong government has moved against the public, charging people with “stirring chaos,” and accusing “anti-China forces” of “inciting social division” and “stirring hatred against authorities.”
Even a public news conference on high-rise building maintenance policies was canceled, and its organizers were forcibly summoned for questioning.
Do Taiwanese truly want to live under a “one country, two regions” system, enduring a life where they are banned from even holding a simple news conference?
By the Hong Kong government’s standards, Taiwanese could be arrested and imprisoned for such actions.
Under those circumstances, how could there be any meaningful government oversight or protection of public rights and interests?
What use would your grievances be when there is nowhere to seek justice?
One of the most precious aspects of Taiwanese society is that people have the right to speak freely about major issues as well as national small social matters. They have the right to rigorously scrutinize the government through assembly and association. Meanwhile, it has already been proven that under Chinese rule, Hong Kongers have no right to discuss public safety.
With the facts before us, would you still accept the deadly “one country, two systems” arrangement?
Chen Kuan-lin is a research manager from Taipei.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
RSS