The devastating fire at the Wang Fuk Court housing complex in Tai Po, Hong Kong, resulted in at least 159 deaths, with dozens still missing. The several subtle incidents that followed the tragedy revealed the top priority of the Hong Kong Government and the authorities in Beijing in responding to the disaster — maintaining the stability of the regime. The rights and interests of Hong Kong residents have been all but sidelined.
For Taiwanese, who are accustomed to democracy and freedom, this should serve as an urgent warning — especially now that some have even proposed the insidious notion of “one country, two regions.”
After the disaster, students in Hong Kong attempted to launch an online petition that outlined their demands: continued support and proper resettlement for residents impacted by the fire, the establishment of an independent investigative committee to probe possible corruption and full government accountability.
For Taiwanese, such demands are completely justified, typical of everyday democratic practice, but that is not the case in Hong Kong.
The person responsible for initiating the petition, 24-year-old Miles Kwan (關靖豐), was immediately arrested by Hong Kong’s national security police on suspicion of “sedition.” A former legislator who shared the online petition was also arrested, accused of “stirring hatred.”
Expressing demands in response to major social events is a right protected in Taiwan, but in Hong Kong, it has become a criminal act that puts one in danger of arrest and prosecution.
Do Taiwanese truly want to be ruled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and live such a life? If the CCP were to govern Taiwan or a “one country, two regions” framework was actually adopted, simply expressing opinions, or raising demands after major disasters or regarding large-scale energy projects could result in an arrest.
Would Taiwanese ever get used to that?
The Wang Fuk Court fire is littered with suspicious circumstances. Before even determining the cause of the incident, the Hong Kong government has moved against the public, charging people with “stirring chaos,” and accusing “anti-China forces” of “inciting social division” and “stirring hatred against authorities.”
Even a public news conference on high-rise building maintenance policies was canceled, and its organizers were forcibly summoned for questioning.
Do Taiwanese truly want to live under a “one country, two regions” system, enduring a life where they are banned from even holding a simple news conference?
By the Hong Kong government’s standards, Taiwanese could be arrested and imprisoned for such actions.
Under those circumstances, how could there be any meaningful government oversight or protection of public rights and interests?
What use would your grievances be when there is nowhere to seek justice?
One of the most precious aspects of Taiwanese society is that people have the right to speak freely about major issues as well as national small social matters. They have the right to rigorously scrutinize the government through assembly and association. Meanwhile, it has already been proven that under Chinese rule, Hong Kongers have no right to discuss public safety.
With the facts before us, would you still accept the deadly “one country, two systems” arrangement?
Chen Kuan-lin is a research manager from Taipei.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
RSS