The Cabinet on Nov. 6 approved a NT$10 billion (US$318.4 million) four-year plan to build tourism infrastructure in mountainous areas and the south.
Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) on Tuesday announced that the Ministry of Transportation and Communications would offer weekday accommodation discounts, birthday specials and other domestic travel incentives beginning next March, aiming to encourage more travel outside the usual weekend and holiday peaks.
The government is right to focus on domestic tourism. Although the data appear encouraging on the surface — as total domestic trips are up compared with their pre-COVID-19 pandemic numbers — a closer look tells a different story.
Domestic tourism spending last year fell 6.2 percent from a year earlier. Overseas travel, on the other hand, is booming. Taiwanese spent roughly NT$1.019 trillion abroad last year, up 42 percent from 2023 — money that might have otherwise supported local economies.
It is clear that many see far more value in traveling to nearby countries than exploring Taiwan, and the government has started to take notice.
The high cost of domestic travel is a major factor behind Taiwan’s tourism deficit. Last year, the average hotel stay cost about NT$2,960 per night — higher than many budget accommodations in popular destinations such as Japan, China, South Korea and Vietnam.
Prices spike on weekends and holidays, the most popular times for overnight trips, creating bottlenecks that deter many potential travelers.
The government’s weekday accommodation program would offer vouchers of up to NT$2,000 per person for stays from Sunday to Thursday, which tend to be less expensive. It would also randomly select 1,000 people each month to receive NT$1,200 for travel on their birthday.
Unfortunately, these incentives fail to account for the basic realities that keep most people from traveling during the week. Domestic tourism is naturally concentrated on weekends and holidays because weekday trips require taking time off from work.
While the ministry encouraged employees to use paid leave for such trips, Taiwan’s mandatory paid leave is limited compared with many other developed countries.
Taking a weekday vacation would mean using one of the few leave days that could otherwise be reserved for rest, longer holidays or personal needs. Students and families with children need to work around school schedules or risk falling behind.
A NT$2,000 travel voucher would not even cover the average cost of a one-night hotel stay, let alone transportation, food and other costs that come with tourism. The proposed birthday specials are similarly limited.
Several attractions across Taiwan announced their own promotions to lure tourists, but isolated initiatives such as raffles or free museum entry, while helpful, are unlikely to draw travelers from across the country.
The government should consider broader, region-focused strategies. Subsidies and attraction-specific incentives could be combined with seasonal events that highlight the unique culture, cuisine, natural beauty and specialties of each area.
Kaohsiung is a strong example — its efforts to draw on its strengths and build an identity as a concert hub are paying off. Concerts by the K-pop group Twice generated more than NT$500 million in revenue last weekend, and the Kaohsiung National Stadium is already fully booked for next year.
The goal of domestic tourism plans should be long-term, sustainable growth — not a cycle of short-term subsidies when demand dips. To shrink the tourism deficit, travelers need to feel that the combined experience, cost and convenience of traveling within the country rivals what they could get from a trip overseas.
Achieving this means building destinations that can stand on their own, through coordinated efforts to create experiences compelling enough that travelers return because they want to — not because they received a voucher.
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength
RSS