Born of crisis but torn by years of tensions among its members, the group of 20 major economies scored a rare victory for multilateralism after overcoming the boycott and objections of its most powerful member, the US.
South Africa, this year’s G20 president, rallied all but two member nations — the US and Argentina — to issue a declaration, ignoring Washington’s warnings and quelling questions about the G20’s future — at least for now.
Many doubted Pretoria would secure a declaration, much less tackle issues such as helping poor nations cope with climate change and external debt.
Illustration: Mountain People
That success strengthened a body which for years was struggling to reach meaningful agreements, and highlighted the power of multilateralism when it seemed in retreat, researchers and delegates said.
The outcome infuriated the US, next year’s G20 host. The White House accused South Africa of weaponizing its presidency to undermine the G20’s founding principles on unanimous consensus.
US President Donald Trump would restore its “legitimacy” while hosting next year, it said.
The White House had no immediate comment when asked if it planned to disinvite South Africa from next year’s G20 events.
The declaration’s final paragraph was carefully worded to commit to meeting in future G20 summits in the UK and South Korea, but only to “working together” under the US presidency, a South African delegate said.
South African President Cyril Ramaphosa declined a US offer to hand over the rotating G20 presidency to a junior diplomat. That ceremony took place between equivalent diplomats this week.
The summit had seemed hopelessly overshadowed by Trump’s boycott over false allegations that South Africa’s black majority government mistreats its white minority.
A South African delegate at the summit, who declined to be named, because they were not authorized to speak, said the agreement on a draft caused a visible ripple of relief among negotiators.
“News of the G20’s demise is greatly exaggerated,” said Josh Lipsky, the Atlantic Council’s international economics chair and ex-aide to former US president Barack Obama.
“In a crisis ... it will be there — regardless of which leaders are present at any ... summit,” he said. The declaration tackled issues such as climate and renewable energy that often divide G20 members. It proposed the first global panel to address inequality.
“This is the first meeting of world leaders ... which put the inequality emergency at the center of the international agenda,” Oxfam economic justice senior director Nabil Ahmed said.
Faced with Trump’s ire, G20 leaders had a choice: “Do we butter him up or stand up to him?” Atlantic Council Eurasia Center nonresident senior fellow Michael Bociurkiw said. They chose the latter.
“Leaders were getting fed up,” he said.
“This could set a new approach to dealing with Donald Trump,” he added, a view several delegates echoed.
Saturday’s show of unity was aimed at supporting the hosts and decrying the US’ refusal to engage in the G20’s first African summit, one said.
The US’ actions brought together countries at odds with Trump, such as India and South Africa, with others seeking to maintain good relations, including the UK and France, another said.
With the US taking up the mantle, there is a risk much of the work in Johannesburg could be undone. Washington is expected to narrow the G20’s focus during its presidency, which coincides with the US’ 250th anniversary, to just the leaders’ summit and financial forum, jettisoning other working groups and ministers’ meetings on energy, health and the environment.
“The United States looks forward to emphasizing economic growth, deregulation and energy abundance as key pillars of its 2026 G20 host year,” a US Department of the Treasury spokesman said. “A back-to-basics approach at the G20 is long overdue.”
Entities including the IMF and the World Bank are still invited, but Washington plans to exclude UN organizations, a source familiar with the plans said.
Then again, it is only for a year.
At worst, countries could “lay low” during the US presidency then resume work later, said one delegate who also declined to be named.
Despite the bitter differences, Washington’s G20 agenda overlaps with Pretoria’s in key areas such as development, economic growth and financial stability, UN adviser and Jubilee USA Network executive director Eric LeCompte said.
“I think there is going to be carry-over in certain areas with the US taking the mantle,” he said.
The Cabinet on Nov. 6 approved a NT$10 billion (US$318.4 million) four-year plan to build tourism infrastructure in mountainous areas and the south. Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) on Tuesday announced that the Ministry of Transportation and Communications would offer weekday accommodation discounts, birthday specials and other domestic travel incentives beginning next March, aiming to encourage more travel outside the usual weekend and holiday peaks. The government is right to focus on domestic tourism. Although the data appear encouraging on the surface — as total domestic trips are up compared with their pre-COVID-19 pandemic numbers — a closer look tells a different
For more than seven decades, the Chinese Communist Party has claimed to govern Tibet with benevolence and progress. I have seen the truth behind the slogans. I have listened to the silences of monks forbidden to speak of the Dalai Lama, watched the erosion of our language in classrooms, and felt the quiet grief of a people whose prayers are monitored and whose culture is treated as a threat. That is why I will only accept complete independence for Tibet. The so-called “autonomous region” is autonomous in name only. Decisions about religion, education and cultural preservation are made in Beijing, not
Apart from the first arms sales approval for Taiwan since US President Donald Trump took office, last month also witnessed another milestone for Taiwan-US relations. Trump signed the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act into law on Tuesday. Its passing without objection in the US Senate underscores how bipartisan US support for Taiwan has evolved. The new law would further help normalize exchanges between Taiwanese and US government officials. We have already seen a flurry of visits to Washington earlier this summer, not only with Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍), but also delegations led by National Security Council Secretary-General Joseph Wu
I recently watched a panel discussion on Taiwan Talks in which the host rightly asked a critical question: Why is the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (IPAC) spearheading a robust global movement to reject China’s ongoing distortion of UN Resolution 2758? While the discussion offered some context, a more penetrating analysis and urgent development was missed. The IPAC action is not merely a political gesture; it is an essential legal and diplomatic countermeasure to China’s escalating and fundamentally baseless campaign to manufacture a claim over Taiwan through the deliberate misinterpretation of a 1971 UN resolution. Since the inauguration of Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) as