As e-mails and documents from the estate of the convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein continue to surface, the revelations have embarrassed many prominent men and, in some cases, toppled them from their positions. However, the disclosures have a wider significance, because they require us to reflect on the frameworks, particularly within academia, that enable the systematic exploitation of young women.
What stands out in the e-mail exchanges between Epstein and renowned economist Larry Summers — a former US secretary of the Treasury and president of Harvard University — is the predatory dynamic in which professional support is implicitly traded for what Summers bluntly calls “romance/sex.” On Wednesday last week, Summers announced that he would immediately leave his role as an instructor at Harvard, while it investigates his ties to Epstein, the Harvard Crimson reported.
For a young academic, professional support can change the course of a career. Universities were largely spared the #MeToo reckoning that hit the entertainment and media industries in 2017. However, academic women of my generation know that this was not because professors and administrators were models of good behavior; rather, it was a matter of timing and the absence of a single, catalyzing scandal.
To their credit, universities have since created safer channels for raising concerns, such as mechanisms for whistleblowing and confidential reporting. While these safeguards can be misused or abused, they have fostered a culture of respect for women — and minorities — that simply did not exist before.
When I was a student and a young academic economist, comments about a woman’s body or appearance — both “appreciation” and outright shaming — were common. These demeaning remarks were often intended to affirm male power. Women were expected, and often advised, to accept them silently, no matter how humiliating.
I remember being openly discriminated against in graduate school by a few senior faculty members. As a foreign female student in a male-dominated environment, I was often asked: “What do women do in your country?” — as though Italy were some backward outpost. It was both frightening and degrading, although my ego was spared the worst, no doubt partly because of my limited grasp of the subtleties of the English language.
I am heartened to see a genuine shift in academia toward a culture of respect that simply did not exist when I was starting my career. Many colleagues treat students with care and seriousness, creating environments where trust and learning can thrive. Is this the “woke” system that, as Summers whined to Epstein, prevents a person from working “at a network or a think tank” if he “hit on a few women 10 years ago”? Whatever one calls it, we should be proud of this progress and vigilant in ensuring that it is not rolled back.
The troubling theme that emerges from the Epstein e-mails is how powerful men use favors to wield influence over young people (especially women). In highly competitive, winner-takes-all professional fields, being plugged into an influential network is an invaluable advantage, as is a mentor who is willing to spend personal or political capital to further your career.
In academia, especially in the humanities and social sciences, where definitions of excellence are more subjective than in engineering and the natural sciences, endorsements from a few “great men” can weigh heavily in recruitment and promotion decisions. This creates fertile ground for predatory behavior.
To be clear, competent candidates might benefit from well-
connected mentors, but unqualified ones rarely advance through external influence alone. This is a subtle game that powerful men know how to play without overtly breaking the rules. For young academics, the stakes are enormous: research funds, publications in distinguished journals, invitations to prestigious conferences, and, the ultimate prize, tenure at a top university.
Of course, one could argue that it takes two to tango, but the power imbalance makes this game fundamentally unfair. That imbalance also explains why the incentives to confront sleazy, well-connected men remain minimal.
Among other things, the Epstein e-mails offer a glimpse into how women (and some men) are vulnerable to unsolicited advances and coercive situations early in their careers. To prevent powerful men like Summers and those born into immense privilege and wealth, like Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, from acting on their sense of entitlement, we must continue to build a culture that repudiates the perverse norms of the old boys’ club — nowhere more so than in academia.
Paola Subacchi is professor and chair in sovereign debt and finance at Sciences Po.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The diplomatic dispute between China and Japan over Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s comments in the Japanese Diet continues to escalate. In a letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, China’s UN Ambassador Fu Cong (傅聰) wrote that, “if Japan dares to attempt an armed intervention in the cross-Strait situation, it would be an act of aggression.” There was no indication that Fu was aware of the irony implicit in the complaint. Until this point, Beijing had limited its remonstrations to diplomatic summonses and weaponization of economic levers, such as banning Japanese seafood imports, discouraging Chinese from traveling to Japan or issuing
The diplomatic spat between China and Japan over comments Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi made on Nov. 7 continues to worsen. Beijing is angry about Takaichi’s remarks that military force used against Taiwan by the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could constitute a “survival-threatening situation” necessitating the involvement of the Japanese Self-Defense Forces. Rather than trying to reduce tensions, Beijing is looking to leverage the situation to its advantage in action and rhetoric. On Saturday last week, four armed China Coast Guard vessels sailed around the Japanese-controlled Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台), known to Japan as the Senkakus. On Friday, in what
On Nov. 8, newly elected Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) and Vice Chairman Chi Lin-len (季麟連) attended a memorial for White Terror era victims, during which convicted Chinese Communist Party (CCP) spies such as Wu Shi (吳石) were also honored. Cheng’s participation in the ceremony, which she said was part of her efforts to promote cross-strait reconciliation, has trapped herself and her party into the KMT’s dark past, and risks putting the party back on its old disastrous road. Wu, a lieutenant general who was the Ministry of National Defense’s deputy chief of the general staff, was recruited
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Nov. 5 recalled more than 150,000 eggs found to contain three times the legal limit of the pesticide metabolite fipronil-sulfone. Nearly half of the 1,169 affected egg cartons, which had been distributed across 10 districts, had already been sold. Using the new traceability system, officials quickly urged the public to avoid consuming eggs with the traceability code “I47045,” while the remainder were successfully recalled. Changhua County’s Wenya Farm — the source of the tainted eggs — was fined NT$120,000, and the Ministry of Agriculture instructed the county’s Animal Disease Control Center to require that
RSS