In mid-February last year, Russian authorities placed then-Estonian prime minister Kaja Kallas — now EU high representative for foreign affairs and security policy — and several others on a wanted list. The list included government officials, members of parliament and local councilors from three Baltic states, and a history professor. The reason was they supported the removal of Soviet-era monuments in their respective countries.
For the Baltic states, removing symbols of Soviet authoritarianism is part of an ongoing process of transitional justice — bidding farewell to the dark years of Soviet occupation and cleaning up the historical traces of oppression and massacres committed by past invaders. Yet Moscow, claiming that it “rescued” those countries from the Nazis, portrays this as a hostile action against Russia, labeling it as “rehabilitating Nazism” and equating dismantling the removal of Soviet soldiers’ monuments with insulting the Russian military. Russian President Vladimir Putin made similar baseless accusations prior to his invasion of Ukraine.
Kallas was Estonia’s first female prime minister since it gained independence from the Soviet Union in 1991. After the outbreak of the Ukraine war, she became one of Putin’s strongest and most outspoken critics. Under her leadership, Estonia became a staunch supporter of Ukraine. As Russia’s military threats became increasingly brazen, Kallas said that Estonia would accelerate the removal of more than 400 Soviet-era monuments, earning her a reputation as “Europe’s New Iron Lady.”
Kallas is the first foreign head of state to be placed on a wanted list by Russia — but to her, the list is worth nothing more than the paper it is printed on. If anything, it serves as a badge of honor representing her democratic achievements.
After the Soviet Union occupied Estonia in 1940, many members of Kallas’ family, including her mother and grandmother, were deported to Siberia. She is therefore viscerally aware of the nature of authoritarian oppression, and she firmly believes that Russia has not changed one bit since that time. She dismissed the list as a veiled repression tactic, saying that it only proves that she was “doing the right thing” by supporting Ukraine, that it is, in fact, hurting authorities in Moscow, which is why the Kremlin is making such a dramatic show of silencing her. Kallas stressed that Putin would not succeed: She would continue her strong support for Ukraine and advocate bolstering Europe’s defense capabilities.
The wanted list instead highlighted Kallas’ strong opposition to Russia and boosted her political clout, propelling her into the ranks of top contenders for senior positions within the EU. On Dec. 1 last year, after narrowly missing the role of NATO secretary-general, Kallas assumed office as EU high representative for foreign affairs and security policy, and vice president of the European Commission. Breaking free from the limitations associated with leading a small, sparsely populated state, she now plays an active role on the broader international political stage as the EU’s chief diplomat.
Global authoritarianism operates in a transnational network, supporting one another with information and imitating techniques for control. Russia placed Kallas on its wanted list for “hostile actions” and “desecration of historical memory,” while China has declared it would pursue Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Puma Shen (沈伯洋) worldwide for “secession-related criminal activities.”
Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) are following the same script, repeatedly exporting the same arguments — it is in no way unjust to label them as an alliance of dictators.
Chen Yung-chang is a freelance writer based in Taipei.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Chinese agents often target Taiwanese officials who are motivated by financial gain rather than ideology, while people who are found guilty of spying face lenient punishments in Taiwan, a researcher said on Tuesday. While the law says that foreign agents can be sentenced to death, people who are convicted of spying for Beijing often serve less than nine months in prison because Taiwan does not formally recognize China as a foreign nation, Institute for National Defense and Security Research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) said. Many officials and military personnel sell information to China believing it to be of little value, unaware that
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
The central bank and the US Department of the Treasury on Friday issued a joint statement that both sides agreed to avoid currency manipulation and the use of exchange rates to gain a competitive advantage, and would only intervene in foreign-exchange markets to combat excess volatility and disorderly movements. The central bank also agreed to disclose its foreign-exchange intervention amounts quarterly rather than every six months, starting from next month. It emphasized that the joint statement is unrelated to tariff negotiations between Taipei and Washington, and that the US never requested the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar during the
RSS