Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Puma Shen (沈伯洋) is being investigated by the Chinese government for the crime of “separatism” and was smeared in a so-called “expose” by state-run China Central Television (CCTV). The Chinese campaign is more than intimidation of an individual; it is part of an ongoing program of psychological warfare against Taiwanese. Although China’s move is a weaponization of the law with state media as cheerleader, its ultimate goal is not a legal outcome, but to create a chilling effect that drives Taiwanese to self-censor.
Despite the barefaced nature of these political threats, there are domestic voices that have responded with mockery and deflection from the crux of the matter. By some perverse logic, opposition legislators have called on President William Lai (賴清德) to “self-reflect” rather than condemn China. If it were not for China’s sustained military threats, information infiltration and diplomatic suppression, Taiwan would have no need for legislation like the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), which Shen advocated. What needs to be examined is not the government’s defense, but the reality of Chinese interference.
China’s decision to target Shen was not random and must be understood in its wider context. First, last month’s meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) failed to secure any US move against Taiwan, leading to Chinese frustration and renewed pressure on Taipei. Second, Beijing’s commemoration of the 80th anniversary of “Taiwan’s retrocession” and the “seven benefits of unification” proposed by China’s top Taiwan policy official Wang Huning (王滬寧) appear as gestures of goodwill, but in fact lay the rhetorical groundwork for a crackdown on supposed “Taiwanese independence forces.” Third is the resurgence of “wolf warrior”-style diplomacy and a willingness to defy international norms. Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian’s (薛劍) now-deleted threats against Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, and China’s warnings of diplomatic retaliation if the UK does not approve plans for its new embassy in central London are both prime examples.
It is clear that the CCP’s actions are an affront to Taiwan’s democracy. If China could get away with throwing around labels of “troublemaking separatists,” next could be anyone who dares to criticize it. Throughout history, this kind of labeling and persecution has always been one of the most destructive weapons in the arsenal of authoritarian regimes.
The government — in particular the Mainland Affairs Council, which is responsible for overseeing cross-strait relations — has made its position clear. It is working on cooperation across ministries and with like-minded allies on responses to Chinese threats. It could consider the following measures:
First, China’s cross-border intimidation of Taiwanese officials should be classified as a national security issue that is antagonistic to democratic governance. Second, Taiwan should work with diplomatic allies to establish mechanisms for resisting transnational repression and ensure that Taiwanese targeted by China would not face extradition or detention overseas. Third, it should investigate formal and informal channels of exchanges with China, and suspend contact with any individuals or organizations involved in propaganda, infiltration or judicial coercion.
Taiwan must not be constrained or silenced by fear. It must not retreat in the face of authoritarian bullying, but respond with conviction in its institutions, judiciary and democratic values. Only then can it gain the understanding and support of the global community.
Wang Hung-jen is a professor at National Cheng Kung University’s Department of Political Science.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Former Fijian prime minister Mahendra Chaudhry spoke at the Yushan Forum in Taipei on Monday, saying that while global conflicts were causing economic strife in the world, Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy (NSP) serves as a stabilizing force in the Indo-Pacific region and offers strategic opportunities for small island nations such as Fiji, as well as support in the fields of public health, education, renewable energy and agricultural technology. Taiwan does not have official diplomatic relations with Fiji, but it is one of the small island nations covered by the NSP. Chaudhry said that Fiji, as a sovereign nation, should support
RSS