Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi late last month made ripples throughout Japan and the region with her charm offensive during US President Donald Trump’s Tokyo visit. Their camaraderie appeared as if it was a reunion of old friends, despite being their first in-person meeting. The leaders vowed to deepen economic and security cooperation and signed a framework agreement on the supply of critical minerals and rare earths. Noteworthy is not only how the supply of such minerals is vital to Taiwan’s economic resilience, but how Taiwan came up in the summit and Takaichi’s bold public support for its neighbor.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry relies heavily on rare earths while the country works to bolster its artificial intelligence capabilities.
During the meeting, major Japanese and American suppliers to Taiwanese chipmakers — such as Hitachi, Murata, Mitsubishi, optical fiber maker Fujikura and MitraChem, cofounded by a Taiwanese American — came up as potential partners in the new framework agreement. Japan and the US would work with other international partners to ensure supply chain security.
That fits into President William Lai’s (賴清德) “non-red” supply chain initiative. Taiwan can make inroads here, especially with Takaichi’s emphasis on working with regional like-minded partners to build resilient supply chains. Clearly, the agreement is intended to counter the dominance of China in rare earths — it processes about 90 percent of the world’s supply.
Another key area discussed was energy security. Given that Taiwan imports more than 90 percent of its energy products, it is an area that direly needs addressing. The new US-Japan framework could provide an opportunity for Taiwan to contribute, while also diversifying its energy sources.
Trump and Takaichi reiterated the importance of peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait by opposing unilateral attempts to change the “status quo” by force or coercion. Takaichi also echoed the same message at the ASEAN and APEC summits last month. That proactive approach to Taiwan policy was welcomed in Taipei, with Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) issuing a statement of appreciation.
However, Takaichi’s departure from a more muted Taiwan approach taken by her immediate predecessor, former Japanese prime minister Shigeru Ishiba, did not stop during her “energetic” diplomacy — a term coined by Japan’s largest opposition party leader, Yoshihiko Noda, to praise her successful meeting with Trump.
During a Japanese House of Representatives budget committee meeting on Friday last week, Takaichi became the first sitting prime minister to directly link a Taiwan contingency with Japan’s self-defense. She explicitly said that “if warships are used and there is military action, it could clearly be seen as a crisis that threatens Japan’s existence.” She added that a Chinese blockade and the deployment of drones might also trigger Japanese military intervention.
Alongside Takaichi’s record public support — more than 80 percent of Japanese aged 18 to 39 support her Cabinet — the message fits well with Japanese public sentiment, with about 80 percent saying they are either wary of China or support minimizing interaction with Beijing, consistent with the widely referenced Sasakawa Peace Foundation’s 2025 Survey on Japanese views of China.
Beijing’s “wolf warrior” diplomats responded aggressively, with Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) going on social media to call Takaichi stupid and making a comment about chopping off her head if she stuck out her “dirty neck.” That drew wide criticism of China from all of Japan’s major political parties, while Tokyo lodged a strong rebuke to Beijing.
Chinese reactions are just another sign of why such security assurances and other forms of support for Taiwan and Takaichi’s pragmatism in holding firm against Chinese hegemonic ambitions are a game changer for Taipei.
Rath Wang is a senior policy fellow at Safe Spaces, a consulting firm based in Taipei and Washington focusing on Taiwan’s politics, media and civil society. He is a producer and host of political talk shows and podcasts and has worked on political campaigns and advocacies in Taiwan, Japan and the US.
The Cabinet on Nov. 6 approved a NT$10 billion (US$318.4 million) four-year plan to build tourism infrastructure in mountainous areas and the south. Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) on Tuesday announced that the Ministry of Transportation and Communications would offer weekday accommodation discounts, birthday specials and other domestic travel incentives beginning next March, aiming to encourage more travel outside the usual weekend and holiday peaks. The government is right to focus on domestic tourism. Although the data appear encouraging on the surface — as total domestic trips are up compared with their pre-COVID-19 pandemic numbers — a closer look tells a different
For more than seven decades, the Chinese Communist Party has claimed to govern Tibet with benevolence and progress. I have seen the truth behind the slogans. I have listened to the silences of monks forbidden to speak of the Dalai Lama, watched the erosion of our language in classrooms, and felt the quiet grief of a people whose prayers are monitored and whose culture is treated as a threat. That is why I will only accept complete independence for Tibet. The so-called “autonomous region” is autonomous in name only. Decisions about religion, education and cultural preservation are made in Beijing, not
Apart from the first arms sales approval for Taiwan since US President Donald Trump took office, last month also witnessed another milestone for Taiwan-US relations. Trump signed the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act into law on Tuesday. Its passing without objection in the US Senate underscores how bipartisan US support for Taiwan has evolved. The new law would further help normalize exchanges between Taiwanese and US government officials. We have already seen a flurry of visits to Washington earlier this summer, not only with Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍), but also delegations led by National Security Council Secretary-General Joseph Wu
I recently watched a panel discussion on Taiwan Talks in which the host rightly asked a critical question: Why is the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (IPAC) spearheading a robust global movement to reject China’s ongoing distortion of UN Resolution 2758? While the discussion offered some context, a more penetrating analysis and urgent development was missed. The IPAC action is not merely a political gesture; it is an essential legal and diplomatic countermeasure to China’s escalating and fundamentally baseless campaign to manufacture a claim over Taiwan through the deliberate misinterpretation of a 1971 UN resolution. Since the inauguration of Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) as
RSS