Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi late last month made ripples throughout Japan and the region with her charm offensive during US President Donald Trump’s Tokyo visit. Their camaraderie appeared as if it was a reunion of old friends, despite being their first in-person meeting. The leaders vowed to deepen economic and security cooperation and signed a framework agreement on the supply of critical minerals and rare earths. Noteworthy is not only how the supply of such minerals is vital to Taiwan’s economic resilience, but how Taiwan came up in the summit and Takaichi’s bold public support for its neighbor.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry relies heavily on rare earths while the country works to bolster its artificial intelligence capabilities.
During the meeting, major Japanese and American suppliers to Taiwanese chipmakers — such as Hitachi, Murata, Mitsubishi, optical fiber maker Fujikura and MitraChem, cofounded by a Taiwanese American — came up as potential partners in the new framework agreement. Japan and the US would work with other international partners to ensure supply chain security.
That fits into President William Lai’s (賴清德) “non-red” supply chain initiative. Taiwan can make inroads here, especially with Takaichi’s emphasis on working with regional like-minded partners to build resilient supply chains. Clearly, the agreement is intended to counter the dominance of China in rare earths — it processes about 90 percent of the world’s supply.
Another key area discussed was energy security. Given that Taiwan imports more than 90 percent of its energy products, it is an area that direly needs addressing. The new US-Japan framework could provide an opportunity for Taiwan to contribute, while also diversifying its energy sources.
Trump and Takaichi reiterated the importance of peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait by opposing unilateral attempts to change the “status quo” by force or coercion. Takaichi also echoed the same message at the ASEAN and APEC summits last month. That proactive approach to Taiwan policy was welcomed in Taipei, with Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) issuing a statement of appreciation.
However, Takaichi’s departure from a more muted Taiwan approach taken by her immediate predecessor, former Japanese prime minister Shigeru Ishiba, did not stop during her “energetic” diplomacy — a term coined by Japan’s largest opposition party leader, Yoshihiko Noda, to praise her successful meeting with Trump.
During a Japanese House of Representatives budget committee meeting on Friday last week, Takaichi became the first sitting prime minister to directly link a Taiwan contingency with Japan’s self-defense. She explicitly said that “if warships are used and there is military action, it could clearly be seen as a crisis that threatens Japan’s existence.” She added that a Chinese blockade and the deployment of drones might also trigger Japanese military intervention.
Alongside Takaichi’s record public support — more than 80 percent of Japanese aged 18 to 39 support her Cabinet — the message fits well with Japanese public sentiment, with about 80 percent saying they are either wary of China or support minimizing interaction with Beijing, consistent with the widely referenced Sasakawa Peace Foundation’s 2025 Survey on Japanese views of China.
Beijing’s “wolf warrior” diplomats responded aggressively, with Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) going on social media to call Takaichi stupid and making a comment about chopping off her head if she stuck out her “dirty neck.” That drew wide criticism of China from all of Japan’s major political parties, while Tokyo lodged a strong rebuke to Beijing.
Chinese reactions are just another sign of why such security assurances and other forms of support for Taiwan and Takaichi’s pragmatism in holding firm against Chinese hegemonic ambitions are a game changer for Taipei.
Rath Wang is a senior policy fellow at Safe Spaces, a consulting firm based in Taipei and Washington focusing on Taiwan’s politics, media and civil society. He is a producer and host of political talk shows and podcasts and has worked on political campaigns and advocacies in Taiwan, Japan and the US.
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
As technological change sweeps across the world, the focus of education has undergone an inevitable shift toward artificial intelligence (AI) and digital learning. However, the HundrED Global Collection 2026 report has a message that Taiwanese society and education policymakers would do well to reflect on. In the age of AI, the scarcest resource in education is not advanced computing power, but people; and the most urgent global educational crisis is not technological backwardness, but teacher well-being and retention. Covering 52 countries, the report from HundrED, a Finnish nonprofit that reviews and compiles innovative solutions in education from around the world, highlights a
RSS