As an American observer of Taiwan’s legislative debates, I find myself envying something Taiwan has that the US lacks: a meaningful defense against pre-election polling manipulation.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Weng Hsiao-ling’s (翁曉玲) proposed amendments to Article 53 of the Public Officials Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法) would slash the pre-election media blackout period from 10 days to a mere three. It would open the floodgates to foreign interference threatening Taiwan’s democracy.
Weng claims that there is no evidence showing pre-election polls influence voters’ decisions. If this were true, that raises the question: Why the rush to publish them? Polls matter precisely because they do influence voter behavior.
The real question is whose interests are served by allowing their unveiling in the 11th hour when there is little time to verify their accuracy or expose manipulation.
Taiwan faces a geopolitical reality that makes it uniquely vulnerable to information warfare. China’s willingness and capacity to interfere with Taiwan’s elections demonstrate exactly why reducing the blackout period is a high-risk proposition.
As Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chuang Jui-hsiung (莊瑞雄) warned, with “China’s long history of using disinformation and fake polls to manipulate public opinion in Taiwan, the potential risks should be carefully considered.”
The 10-day blackout period provides the time necessary to fact-check and expose fabricated polls. Reducing this window to three days would leave little time to counter disinformation effectively.
Citizen Congress Watch executive director Chang Hung-lin (張宏林) took Chuang’s warning a step further, arguing that “the legislature should focus on amending regulations to penalize the dissemination of fake polls rather than shortening the blackout period, which could further polarize society during elections.”
Taiwan lacks a legal framework for penalizing those who fabricate polls. Until such protections exist, shortening the blackout period is reckless.
As Chuang said: “While the public’s right to know is important, national security and electoral integrity must be ensured.”
A democracy manipulated by fabricated foreign polls is not exercising its free will.
The US operates without any such blackout period. As a result, its process has been leveraged by special interests that weaponize polling for unsavory ends. Lee Atwater’s legacy is alive and well through the modern “push poll,” a method designed not to measure public opinion, but to mold it — sowing doubt and spreading disinformation under the guise of research.
Push polls are fake surveys that disguise suggestions as fact. Reputable groups such as the American Association for Public Opinion Research and the National Council on Public Polls condemn the practice.
The result is an electoral landscape where perception often matters more than substance. The final days of US elections resemble a carnival’s hall of mirrors, with polls claiming to reflect the public’s will while simultaneously shaping it — creating a feedback loop that serves whoever has the resources to flood the zone with their preferred facts.
Taiwan has the wisdom to recognize the danger such methods pose if left unchecked.
For Taiwan, maintaining a robust blackout period is a strategic imperative. Every safeguard that Taiwan implements is an assertion of its democratic autonomy. As China seeks to undermine confidence in Taiwan’s institutions, proving they can be protected matters enormously.
Weakening the blackout period sends the wrong signal. It would suggest that the legislature is willing to make its elections more vulnerable to the very interference Beijing practices relentlessly.
The question facing the legislature is simple: In whose interest is it to reduce the blackout period? Not the voters, who deserve accurate information untainted by foreign interference. Not Taiwan’s democracy. The only beneficiaries would be foreign actors and domestic opportunists willing to partner with them.
From an American watching Taiwan’s democracy with admiration and concern, my plea is straightforward: Do not make the same mistakes as the US. Do not surrender a protection we wish we had.
If last-minute polls truly do not influence voters, there is nothing to gain by publishing them. If they do influence voters — and they do — then Taiwan must maintain the safeguards that prevent them from being weaponized by its adversaries.
The blackout period must remain strong enough to ensure that choice remains Taiwan’s own.
Duncan Barron is a former voter protection specialist who worked for the Democratic Party of Virginia and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. He is a J.D. candidate at American University’s Washington College of Law.
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.
Yesterday, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), once the dominant political party in Taiwan and the historic bearer of Chinese republicanism, officially crowned Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) as its chairwoman. A former advocate for Taiwanese independence turned Beijing-leaning firebrand, Cheng represents the KMT’s latest metamorphosis — not toward modernity, moderation or vision, but toward denial, distortion and decline. In an interview with Deutsche Welle that has now gone viral, Cheng declared with an unsettling confidence that Russian President Vladimir Putin is “not a dictator,” but rather a “democratically elected leader.” She went on to lecture the German journalist that Russia had been “democratized
RSS