You might have thought Beijing’s effort to attract global science, technology, engineering and mathematics talent would fire up legions of patriotic keyboard warriors eager to celebrate the US’ relative decline. Instead, the launch of a new work visa has sparked an online furor that highlights the soft underbelly of China’s much-vaunted industrial policy.
The decade-long “Made in China” campaign to ensure the country could compete with the best of the West in 10 key industries — including robotics, electric vehicles and pharmaceuticals — has been largely successful. The technical prowess, exemplified by January’s DeepSeek moment, has fired up the stock market. However, it has not been enough to fill the gap left by the collapse of the property sector, which once accounted for as much as 32 percent of the economy.
Consumer pessimism was on display last week when the country wrapped up an eight-day holiday break.
Data suggested that travelers were pinching their pennies.
Spending was subdued, road trips replaced flights and box office sales missed expectations, Bloomberg News reported.
Against this backdrop, it was not an ideal time to debut the K visa — what some have called China’s equivalent of the H-1B. For now, details are still scant, although it comes as part of Beijing’s post-COVID-19 pandemic moves to loosen restrictions on dozens of countries to revitalize travel and consumption.
Announced in August, the new category drew little attention until US President Donald Trump introduced a US$100,000 fee on the highly coveted H-1B, which has brought millions of ambitious foreign workers, especially from India, to the US since 1990.
Following the announcement, Indian media began to speculate on whether China’s ascendant tech firms might offer an alternative pathway if the US effectively closes its doors.
Some of the resulting backlash on Chinese social media has been downright xenophobic and even racist. However, much of the discourse has been more constructive, serving to reinforce what Bloomberg Opinion columnist Karishma Vaswani called Asia’s staggering jobs crisis that is disproportionately affecting Gen Z.
In China, the problem is particularly acute, because of the sheer size of the deflated real estate sector. For years, property firms followed a simple blueprint: Sell homes before they were finished. This model, introduced in 1990s, was able to keep up with surging demand as the country urbanized.
The revenue funded the industry’s breakneck expansion. That method worked until about five years ago when the government cracked down on excessive borrowing, eventually triggering the downturn.
In 2021, when mega developer China Evergrande Group defaulted on its debt, the industry’s proportion of economic activity was almost double the 18 percent recorded in the US at its height. Because property assets make up about 70 percent of family wealth in China, the impact on spending has been so large that it has been impossible to substitute with growth in other areas.
China’s tech and consumer giants have had a disruptive influence on overseas markets. At home, though, their expansion has not translated into rising tides for everyone. In fact, the tech sector now makes more headlines for cutting positions, especially people older than 35 years old, than hiring.
In a speech last month, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics professor Yao Yang said that despite its travails, real estate remains the country’s largest and most important sector.
Bailing it out would require the central government to set up a national team to buy foreclosed homes, estimated at 1 million this year, as part of a push to stabilize the market, he added.
Most experts agreed that a slow and painful adjustment, which is just getting started, would take years.
In the meantime, Beijing’s Big Tech does have a responsibility to do more to protect its workforce, although it would struggle to add headcount in the way real estate had done.
Bloomberg Economics estimated that tech’s collective contribution to GDP is slowly but surely climbing as the economy looks for new growth drivers.
By next year, the tech industry — defined broadly as including research, medicine and advanced equipment — is expected to grow to 27 trillion yuan (US$3.8 trillion), or just above 18 percent of GDP. At that level, it is still several percentage points short of property’s contribution during its peak in the years 2015 to 2018 and much less impactful in terms of job creation.
DeepSeek’s surprise emergence has done a lot for China tech. It has kicked off an equities rally, turned the tide on the tech war with the US and conferred an aura of cool on the whole sector. However, the industry is struggling to pull its weight on employment. No wonder China’s young job seekers are so upset. The K visa was introduced at the worst possible time. Its days might be numbered.
Juliana Liu is a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion’s Asia team, covering corporate strategy and management in the region. She was previously CNN’s senior business editor for Asia, and a correspondent at BBC News and Reuters.
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has its chairperson election tomorrow. Although the party has long positioned itself as “China friendly,” the election is overshadowed by “an overwhelming wave of Chinese intervention.” The six candidates vying for the chair are former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), former lawmaker Cheng Li-wen (鄭麗文), Legislator Luo Chih-chiang (羅智強), Sun Yat-sen School president Chang Ya-chung (張亞中), former National Assembly representative Tsai Chih-hong (蔡志弘) and former Changhua County comissioner Zhuo Bo-yuan (卓伯源). While Cheng and Hau are front-runners in different surveys, Hau has complained of an online defamation campaign against him coming from accounts with foreign IP addresses,
Taiwan’s business-friendly environment and science parks designed to foster technology industries are the key elements of the nation’s winning chip formula, inspiring the US and other countries to try to replicate it. Representatives from US business groups — such as the Greater Phoenix Economic Council, and the Arizona-Taiwan Trade and Investment Office — in July visited the Hsinchu Science Park (新竹科學園區), home to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) headquarters and its first fab. They showed great interest in creating similar science parks, with aims to build an extensive semiconductor chain suitable for the US, with chip designing, packaging and manufacturing. The
When Taiwan High Speed Rail Corp (THSRC) announced the implementation of a new “quiet carriage” policy across all train cars on Sept. 22, I — a classroom teacher who frequently takes the high-speed rail — was filled with anticipation. The days of passengers videoconferencing as if there were no one else on the train, playing videos at full volume or speaking loudly without regard for others finally seemed numbered. However, this battle for silence was lost after less than one month. Faced with emotional guilt from infants and anxious parents, THSRC caved and retreated. However, official high-speed rail data have long