This year’s Nobel Prize in Economics is unusually pertinent. It honors three scholars who, in different ways, have tried to understand why innovation happens and how it promotes economic growth. These questions have never seemed more pressing.
Technological progress shows no sign of stalling. Quite the opposite: Artificial intelligence promises a new surge of “creative destruction,” meaning higher living standards combined with upheaval in the labor market. Making the most of this prospect is challenging in its own right, but it also exemplifies a deeper puzzle. Over the past few years, advancing knowledge, new goods and services, and new forms of production have arrived alongside sluggish growth in productivity.
Hence the puzzle: Exactly how does technological progress drive prosperity, and why is faster growth not already here? Laureates Joel Mokyr of Northwestern University, Philippe Aghion of the London School of Economics and INSEAD in Paris, and Peter Howitt of Brown University have shed light on these mysteries.
Mokyr is an economic historian who studies episodes of scientific and technological advancement, in particular the knowledge revolution of the late 18th and early 19th centuries. The key point is that discoveries, while essential, are not enough. They have to interact with a supporting cultural and commercial environment that recognizes and applies them. Success requires a compound of scientific knowledge, practical competence and appetite for material progress. History shows that none of those can be taken for granted. The focus of Aghion’s and Hewitt’s work is more squarely on creative destruction, the term coined by Joseph Schumpeter in 1942. The idea acknowledges the downside of innovation: New products dislodge old ones, established firms decline, and new ones take their place, and many workers find their skills no longer in demand.
Crucially, these shifts are part and parcel of economic growth. Rather than errors to be avoided, they are costs to be moderated with judicious public policy, including effective social insurance, better education and training, and attention to economic opportunity. Spur innovation by attending to incentives, supporting research and development, and bolstering competition. That is vital for growth, but be under no illusion: Progress cannot be painless.
Growth through innovation is the only way to keep living standards rising — and rising faster, given the right policies. Growth, and only growth, provides the means to address chronic poverty, vulnerability to disease, climate change and other global threats. Give the prize committee credit for recognizing the centrality of these questions and honoring scholars devoted to finding answers.
The Bloomberg Editorial Board publishes the views of the editors across a range of national and global affairs.
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
Taiwan’s economic momentum, driven by demand for artificial intelligence (AI) products, remains strong, with booming demand for advanced semiconductors, servers and key components. In the first quarter, GDP expanded 14.55 percent year-on-year, the second consecutive quarter of double-digit percentage growth and accelerating from the 12.95 percent expansion in the previous quarter, the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) reported on Friday. Net exports remained the dominant driver of growth, contributing 10.33 percentage points to Taiwan’s GDP growth in the first quarter. That came as exports rose 35.76 percent year-on-year in the first quarter, outpacing 26.34 percent growth in imports, the
RSS