Double Ten National Day speeches are supposed to rise above the noise — to remind citizens, if only for a few minutes, that a nation’s meaning is larger than its problems. In Taiwan, where democracy stands within striking distance of an authoritarian neighbor, such moments carry particular weight. Yet this Oct. 10, as the Republic of China marked its 114th anniversary, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) used the podium not to unite, but to air grievances — and in doing so, turned the country’s most unifying ceremony into another partisan stage.
Before foreign dignitaries and global cameras, Han delivered a speech that might have belonged at a campaign rally. He lamented solar panels destroying forests, black-hearted businessmen excavating valleys, low wages amid a booming stock market, and energy policy dragged down by ideology. He warned of desinicization raising the risk of war. Every phrase was artfully crafted to sound populist, patriotic, and oppositional at once — a kind of political venting session disguised as national reflection.
The performance had all the drama of populist rhetoric, but none of the restraint expected from the head of Taiwan’s legislature. Han was not wrong that Taiwan faces deep problems — political, economic, environmental, social and even existential. There is a time and a place for critique. And the one person in government expected to represent all sides of the chamber should not spend National Day wielding his position like a cudgel against the very government he is supposed to balance, not bludgeon.
And more unsettling was the question of who Han was really addressing. His words were spoken to the crowd in front of the Presidential Office Building, but the echo carried elsewhere. The tone — the imagery of decay, division, and ideological excess — felt strangely calibrated for another audience entirely: Beijing. It felt as if Han was delivering not a speech, but a report.
This is, after all, a man who in 2019, just months after being elected mayor of Kaohsiung, paid a highly controversial visit to China’s Liaison Office in Hong Kong — Beijing’s political nerve center, infamous even then as the symbol of eroding Hong Kong autonomy. The visit prompted outrage across Taiwan and suspicion that Han’s political compass pointed abroad, not inward. His National Day speech seemed to confirm as much. When the legislative head of a besieged democracy chooses its most visible moment to echo the talking points of its adversary, it is difficult to dismiss it as a coincidence.
Han’s defenders — including Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯) — rushed to insist he merely “spoke the truth.” However, truth-telling in politics is not just about what you say; it is about when, where and to whom you say it. To use a national birthday — in front of ambassadors, allies and cameras — to paint Taiwan as broken, demoralized, and divided is to hand Beijing precisely the propaganda it craves. It was not leadership; it was betrayal.
Imagine if the US speaker of the house used the July 4 Independence Day podium to accuse the administration of betraying the nation, undermining its identity, and dragging it toward war — in full view of foreign dignitaries. The scandal would write itself. Yet in Taiwan, the reaction has been depressingly familiar: partisan rallying on one side, moral outrage on the other, and the silent erosion of civic standards in between.
That is the quiet tragedy here. Taiwan’s democracy has survived pressure from outside and dysfunction within because, at key moments, its leaders have remembered that freedom demands discipline — not theatrics. Han’s speech betrayed that discipline.
And while the content of his remarks might please his base, they come at a steep cost. Every word suggesting that Taiwan is fraying or faithless reinforces China’s narrative that democracy is chaos — that only authoritarian order can restore dignity. Han, whether through calculation or carelessness, lent that narrative his office’s authority.
Double Ten National Day is not the time for point-scoring. It is the day to reaffirm the improbable idea that Taiwan — small, noisy and unbowed — still stands for something larger than its quarrels. It deserves leaders who can speak for that idea, not just for their faction.
In the end, Han’s speech was not merely inappropriate; it was revealing. It showed that the most dangerous form of betrayal is not shouted from the outside, but whispered from within — wrapped in patriotism, performed on the nation’s birthday and applauded by those too cynical to notice the damage being done.
John Cheng is a retired businessman from Hong Kong now living in Taiwan.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
RSS