Denial of passports to Tibetans is not simply an inconvenience but a calculated tool of political control, cultural erasure and religious suppression. By restricting mobility, the Chinese state violates fundamental rights guaranteed in its own constitution and in international law, and it creates long-term social, cultural and humanitarian costs for the Tibetan people.
Forced separation from families is a significant issue for Tibetans abroad, as they face difficulties connecting with relatives in Tibet. Many cannot visit dying family members due to passport refusals, and those who attempt to return risk severe punishment. Elderly pilgrims have encountered detention, interrogation and document confiscation, illustrating a regime that manipulates mobility to exert control.
China’s passport policies must be seen within the broader framework of Sinicization and “grid management,” which seek to transform Tibetan identity into a version acceptable to the state. Surveillance and ideological control intensify through travel restrictions that even affect Tibetans studying abroad, whose families are harassed to silence them from attending political or cultural events in exile. The system is designed to isolate Tibetans from global engagement and weaken their culture and faith.
Following the 2012 Kalachakra Initiation in India, thousands who returned to Tibet had their passports confiscated and were sent to “patriotic education” programs. Beyond religion, Tibetans are barred from healthcare, education and cultural exchanges overseas — rights other Chinese citizens enjoy.
These restrictions clearly violate domestic and international laws. China’s Exit and Entry Administration Law affirms every citizen’s right to apply for a passport, and the constitution guarantees equality before the law. Yet Tibetans face arbitrary denials based on loyalty tests.
Internationally, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights guarantee freedom of movement. The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties obliges nations not to undermine their treaty commitments. China’s systematic denial of passports constitutes a breach of both domestic and international obligations.
These violations have drawn global concern. UN human rights experts sought clarification from China in 2018, and the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination condemned the near-total ban on Tibetan passports. Ironically, China permits travel for political spectacle — such as Indian pilgrimages to Kailash Mansarovar — while restricting Tibetans from similar journeys.
Beijing aim sto restrict the cultural, religious and familial ties that uphold Tibetan identity rather than promoting security. China erodes Tibetan autonomy and increases alienation by restricting mobility.
To address the issue of human rights in Tibet, international bodies and governments should urge China to ratify the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and impose sanctions on officials responsible for discriminatory passport policies.
Prioritizing religious freedom in dialogues with China is essential, and civil society must elevate Tibetan voices, framing the denial of mobility as a significant human rights concern.
By severing Tibetans from their families, religion and cultural exchange, China deliberately inflicts profound psychological and social harm. True resolution requires sustained global advocacy, solidarity among exiles and the recognition that freedom of movement is vital to the survival of Tibetan identity.
Tenzing Nyidon holds a bachelor’s degree in political science from Lady Shri Ram College for Women, Delhi University. She is currently an intern at the Tibet Policy Institute.
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has its chairperson election tomorrow. Although the party has long positioned itself as “China friendly,” the election is overshadowed by “an overwhelming wave of Chinese intervention.” The six candidates vying for the chair are former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), former lawmaker Cheng Li-wen (鄭麗文), Legislator Luo Chih-chiang (羅智強), Sun Yat-sen School president Chang Ya-chung (張亞中), former National Assembly representative Tsai Chih-hong (蔡志弘) and former Changhua County comissioner Zhuo Bo-yuan (卓伯源). While Cheng and Hau are front-runners in different surveys, Hau has complained of an online defamation campaign against him coming from accounts with foreign IP addresses,
Taiwan’s business-friendly environment and science parks designed to foster technology industries are the key elements of the nation’s winning chip formula, inspiring the US and other countries to try to replicate it. Representatives from US business groups — such as the Greater Phoenix Economic Council, and the Arizona-Taiwan Trade and Investment Office — in July visited the Hsinchu Science Park (新竹科學園區), home to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) headquarters and its first fab. They showed great interest in creating similar science parks, with aims to build an extensive semiconductor chain suitable for the US, with chip designing, packaging and manufacturing. The
When Taiwan High Speed Rail Corp (THSRC) announced the implementation of a new “quiet carriage” policy across all train cars on Sept. 22, I — a classroom teacher who frequently takes the high-speed rail — was filled with anticipation. The days of passengers videoconferencing as if there were no one else on the train, playing videos at full volume or speaking loudly without regard for others finally seemed numbered. However, this battle for silence was lost after less than one month. Faced with emotional guilt from infants and anxious parents, THSRC caved and retreated. However, official high-speed rail data have long
RSS