If we view former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) within the context of the “Chinese refugee generation,” their words and actions become much easier to understand.
Ma belongs to the first generation of Chinese refugees. His parents fled to Taiwan during the Chinese Civil War, and brought the phantom of the Republic of China (ROC) with them. From a young age, he was indoctrinated with narratives of the “Chinese Dream,” fighting communism and rebuilding “the nation.”
This generation harbors a mix of love and fear toward the Chinese Communist Party (CCP): On one hand, they resent the CCP for seizing their “homeland on the mainland,” yet on the other, they continually seek to justify their own identity through appeals to “national unity” and a cause.
Drawn in by its rhetoric on national identity, their attitude toward the CCP has shifted over time from hostile to sympathetic.
Lung is a second-generation immigrant — she did not personally experience flight and displacement, yet was deeply shaped by her parents’ “refugee complex.”
This group enjoys the benefits of freedom and democracy while living in Taiwan, while nurturing a romanticized notion of “Chinese culture.”
They lean toward a reconciliatory approach to cross-strait relations, believing that communication, understanding and cultural ties can dissipate antagonism and achieve peace. Lung’s discourse on “pushing for peace” and “resilience to engage with the other side” is a reflection of this.
Whether it is Ma’s subservience or Lung’s fantasies, they overlook a core reality of the cross-strait situation.
Communist China is neither an ordinary nation state nor a rational partner that can be persuaded through cultural exchange or good-faith dialogue. Rather, it is a totalitarian system that places authoritarian stability above all.
There are certainly differences between the Ma and Lung positions, with the former leaning toward political attachment and the latter toward cultural illusion. However, they are both expressions of a shared inability among the “refugee generation” to escape China’s shadow. Neither is capable of meeting the current moment in Taiwan. On the contrary, they are doing real harm.
It is regrettable that more than 90 percent of the first and second generations of Chinese refugees display a tendency toward sympathizing with the CCP, if not throwing their lot in with it entirely. It not only shows a lack of gratitude to Taiwan, but also poses a real threat to its survival.
Chang Che-ting is an assistant professor at National United University’s Department of Chinese Language and Literature.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has its chairperson election tomorrow. Although the party has long positioned itself as “China friendly,” the election is overshadowed by “an overwhelming wave of Chinese intervention.” The six candidates vying for the chair are former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), former lawmaker Cheng Li-wen (鄭麗文), Legislator Luo Chih-chiang (羅智強), Sun Yat-sen School president Chang Ya-chung (張亞中), former National Assembly representative Tsai Chih-hong (蔡志弘) and former Changhua County comissioner Zhuo Bo-yuan (卓伯源). While Cheng and Hau are front-runners in different surveys, Hau has complained of an online defamation campaign against him coming from accounts with foreign IP addresses,
Taiwan’s business-friendly environment and science parks designed to foster technology industries are the key elements of the nation’s winning chip formula, inspiring the US and other countries to try to replicate it. Representatives from US business groups — such as the Greater Phoenix Economic Council, and the Arizona-Taiwan Trade and Investment Office — in July visited the Hsinchu Science Park (新竹科學園區), home to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) headquarters and its first fab. They showed great interest in creating similar science parks, with aims to build an extensive semiconductor chain suitable for the US, with chip designing, packaging and manufacturing. The
When Taiwan High Speed Rail Corp (THSRC) announced the implementation of a new “quiet carriage” policy across all train cars on Sept. 22, I — a classroom teacher who frequently takes the high-speed rail — was filled with anticipation. The days of passengers videoconferencing as if there were no one else on the train, playing videos at full volume or speaking loudly without regard for others finally seemed numbered. However, this battle for silence was lost after less than one month. Faced with emotional guilt from infants and anxious parents, THSRC caved and retreated. However, official high-speed rail data have long