Taiwan High Speed Rail Corp’s (THSRC) newly introduced “quiet carriage” policy was intended to enhance the quality of travel, allowing passengers to enjoy some peace during long journeys. The new system quickly sparked controversy, as passengers traveling with young children reported being asked to be quiet — even when seated outside the designated quiet carriages — and in some cases were met with staff holding up signs.
What was originally meant to be an innovative service respecting diverse needs has become a symbol of heavy-handed order. When mandated quiet turns into a form of social pressure, it exposes an issue in Taiwan’s public spaces — our tendency to pursue order while overlooking understanding and communication.
The value of public space lies not only in the ease of transportation, but also as a mixing ground for civilized life. When we emphasize quiet, we are defining who gets to speak and who must remain silent. Holding a sign up to a mother because her child is crying is not merely a matter of behavioral norms, but a form of exclusion.
Public spaces bring strength by embracing diverse voices rather than allowing only the “quiet” to exist. A truly mature society should not use low volume as an indicator of civility, but by whether it can tolerate even the smallest imperfections of human sound.
If THSRC wishes to promote a quiet carriage policy, it should also teach people to understand the concept of diverse forms of being quiet, and make regulations a tool for mutual understanding rather than a weapon of indifference and accusations.
In terms of policy design, the controversy reflects a conflict between the right to quiet and the right to public use. The policy’s supporters say that maintaining low noise levels during long journeys is a person’s right, while opponents say that public transportation is an open space by nature — bringing young children, making phone calls or engaging in quiet conversation are all normal behaviors.
The problem lies in how policy implementation in Taiwan often disregards the need for a balancing mechanism between two sides, allowing one to take precedence. If the system emphasizes silence without considering humanity, it would ultimately risk causing new divisions.
Service design should be guided by the principle of flexible spaces — offering options such as family-friendly carriages, quiet zones and general seating areas — so that order and freedom can coexist.
This issue has also revealed a deeper anxiety within Taiwanese society — an increasing intolerance for external disturbances. Similar debates have occurred over issues such as giving up seats on the MRT, noisy children in restaurants and neighborhood noise disputes. These issues reflect public pressures resulting from the rise of individualism — everyone desires respect, while becoming less tolerant.
When public spaces are imagined as extensions of someone’s personal space, any disruption can become an intrusion. If this mental inflexibility is not addressed, no number of regulations would maintain genuine harmony. Perhaps what Taiwanese society needs is not a quiet car, but a more flexible heart.
The high-speed rail’s mission, as one of Taiwan’s most vaunted transportation services, should transcend efficiency — and also reflect society’s capacity for tolerance and inclusivity.
True “quiet” is not about who can remain silent, but about whether people can coexist among sound. Only when every passenger learns to balance between silence and understanding would Taiwan’s public spaces truly evolve from institutionalized order to a culture of empathy.
Roger Lo is a freelancer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
More than a week after Hondurans voted, the country still does not know who will be its next president. The Honduran National Electoral Council has not declared a winner, and the transmission of results has experienced repeated malfunctions that interrupted updates for almost 24 hours at times. The delay has become the second-longest post-electoral silence since the election of former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernandez of the National Party in 2017, which was tainted by accusations of fraud. Once again, this has raised concerns among observers, civil society groups and the international community. The preliminary results remain close, but both
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
RSS