Starting next year, drivers older than 70 may be entitled to a monthly NT$1,500 public transportation and taxi subsidy if they relinquish their driver’s license, the Ministry of Transportation and Communications announced on Tuesday. The measure is part of a broader effort to improve road safety, with eligible participants receiving the subsidy for two years.
The announcement comes amid mounting concern over traffic safety in Taiwan. A 2022 article by CNN quoted the name of a Facebook group devoted to the traffic situation called “Taiwan is a living hell for pedestrians,” while Berlin-based bne IntelliNews last month called it a “deadly mix of drivers and pedestrians,” warning travelers to “think twice before booking a flight.”
Taiwan last year recorded nearly 400,000 traffic incidents — 290,000 of them in the first nine months alone — resulting in more than 2,000 deaths and 386,000 injuries. A significant share of the incidents involved drivers older than 65, prompting calls for stricter regulation. Nearly 60,000 incidents involving elderly drivers were reported last year, leading to close to 80,000 injuries. The issue gained national attention on May 19, when a 78-year-old driver in New Taipei City’s Sansia District (三峽) plowed into pedestrians and scooter riders near a school, killing three people and injuring 12. The driver also died.
However, the new subsidy might do little to improve safety. Those unfit to drive are unlikely to give up their licenses voluntarily. Taiwan’s persistent problems with driving under the influence (DUI) and unlicensed driving suggest that dangerous drivers often ignore the rules. The nation averages about 10,000 DUI cases per year, while unlicensed driving remains alarmingly common. In 2023, 55,492 accidents involved unlicensed drivers, causing 78,885 injuries and 763 deaths. On May 23, a 78-year-old unlicensed driver ran a red light in Taipei, colliding with a bus and three other vehicles, injuring himself and seven others.
As typically happens after a high-profile tragedy, lawmakers pledged to act. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators Lo Chih-chiang (羅智強) and Lo Ting-wei (羅廷瑋) proposed doubling fines for unlicensed driving from NT$6,000 to NT$24,000 to NT$12,000 to NT$36,000, with repeat offenders facing fines of up to NT$100,000 and vehicle seizure. Yet as history shows, stiffer penalties are unlikely to make a difference. A driver willing to risk a NT$24,000 fine would likely risk a NT$36,000 fine as well. Without consistent enforcement, laws remain hollow. What Taiwan truly needs is stricter, sustained enforcement and stronger driver education.
The Highway Bureau on Oct. 1 announced that it would replace yes-or-no questions with multiple-choice ones on the written driving test. While a small improvement, it falls far short of addressing deeper issues. Taiwan’s driver education system must go beyond rote memorization. Classroom-based traffic education should begin in high school, teaching road awareness and pedestrian safety. Driving instruction should include more real-world practice with professional supervision to reinforce safe habits. Taiwan could also adopt a graduated licensing system similar to those used in Canada, Australia, the US and many European countries. New drivers would face restrictions that are lifted progressively, such as limits on nighttime driving or passenger numbers, encouraging responsible habits before full licensing.
Encouraging elderly drivers who are no longer fit to drive to give up their licenses is a sensible measure, but subsidies alone will not reverse Taiwan’s alarming traffic trends. Unless the government addresses the twin failures of lax enforcement and weak education, the country’s roads will remain perilous. Real safety reform requires a cultural shift: one that values responsibility, not convenience and enforces the law with consistency rather than reaction. Taiwan’s traffic crisis cannot be solved with subsidies — it must be rebuilt from the ground up.
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
As technological change sweeps across the world, the focus of education has undergone an inevitable shift toward artificial intelligence (AI) and digital learning. However, the HundrED Global Collection 2026 report has a message that Taiwanese society and education policymakers would do well to reflect on. In the age of AI, the scarcest resource in education is not advanced computing power, but people; and the most urgent global educational crisis is not technological backwardness, but teacher well-being and retention. Covering 52 countries, the report from HundrED, a Finnish nonprofit that reviews and compiles innovative solutions in education from around the world, highlights a
RSS