Starting next year, drivers older than 70 may be entitled to a monthly NT$1,500 public transportation and taxi subsidy if they relinquish their driver’s license, the Ministry of Transportation and Communications announced on Tuesday. The measure is part of a broader effort to improve road safety, with eligible participants receiving the subsidy for two years.
The announcement comes amid mounting concern over traffic safety in Taiwan. A 2022 article by CNN quoted the name of a Facebook group devoted to the traffic situation called “Taiwan is a living hell for pedestrians,” while Berlin-based bne IntelliNews last month called it a “deadly mix of drivers and pedestrians,” warning travelers to “think twice before booking a flight.”
Taiwan last year recorded nearly 400,000 traffic incidents — 290,000 of them in the first nine months alone — resulting in more than 2,000 deaths and 386,000 injuries. A significant share of the incidents involved drivers older than 65, prompting calls for stricter regulation. Nearly 60,000 incidents involving elderly drivers were reported last year, leading to close to 80,000 injuries. The issue gained national attention on May 19, when a 78-year-old driver in New Taipei City’s Sansia District (三峽) plowed into pedestrians and scooter riders near a school, killing three people and injuring 12. The driver also died.
However, the new subsidy might do little to improve safety. Those unfit to drive are unlikely to give up their licenses voluntarily. Taiwan’s persistent problems with driving under the influence (DUI) and unlicensed driving suggest that dangerous drivers often ignore the rules. The nation averages about 10,000 DUI cases per year, while unlicensed driving remains alarmingly common. In 2023, 55,492 accidents involved unlicensed drivers, causing 78,885 injuries and 763 deaths. On May 23, a 78-year-old unlicensed driver ran a red light in Taipei, colliding with a bus and three other vehicles, injuring himself and seven others.
As typically happens after a high-profile tragedy, lawmakers pledged to act. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators Lo Chih-chiang (羅智強) and Lo Ting-wei (羅廷瑋) proposed doubling fines for unlicensed driving from NT$6,000 to NT$24,000 to NT$12,000 to NT$36,000, with repeat offenders facing fines of up to NT$100,000 and vehicle seizure. Yet as history shows, stiffer penalties are unlikely to make a difference. A driver willing to risk a NT$24,000 fine would likely risk a NT$36,000 fine as well. Without consistent enforcement, laws remain hollow. What Taiwan truly needs is stricter, sustained enforcement and stronger driver education.
The Highway Bureau on Oct. 1 announced that it would replace yes-or-no questions with multiple-choice ones on the written driving test. While a small improvement, it falls far short of addressing deeper issues. Taiwan’s driver education system must go beyond rote memorization. Classroom-based traffic education should begin in high school, teaching road awareness and pedestrian safety. Driving instruction should include more real-world practice with professional supervision to reinforce safe habits. Taiwan could also adopt a graduated licensing system similar to those used in Canada, Australia, the US and many European countries. New drivers would face restrictions that are lifted progressively, such as limits on nighttime driving or passenger numbers, encouraging responsible habits before full licensing.
Encouraging elderly drivers who are no longer fit to drive to give up their licenses is a sensible measure, but subsidies alone will not reverse Taiwan’s alarming traffic trends. Unless the government addresses the twin failures of lax enforcement and weak education, the country’s roads will remain perilous. Real safety reform requires a cultural shift: one that values responsibility, not convenience and enforces the law with consistency rather than reaction. Taiwan’s traffic crisis cannot be solved with subsidies — it must be rebuilt from the ground up.
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Nvidia Corp’s plan to build its new headquarters at the Beitou Shilin Science Park’s T17 and T18 plots has stalled over a land rights dispute, prompting the Taipei City Government to propose the T12 plot as an alternative. The city government has also increased pressure on Shin Kong Life Insurance Co, which holds the development rights for the T17 and T18 plots. The proposal is the latest by the city government over the past few months — and part of an ongoing negotiation strategy between the two sides. Whether Shin Kong Life Insurance backs down might be the key factor
RSS