Internet personality Holger Chen (陳之漢), commonly known as Kuan Chang (館長), apparently called for the decapitation of President William Lai (賴清德) during a live stream on Sunday. Could such a violent remark really be forgiven?
Let us first look to the US. Title 18, Section 871 of the US Code stipulates that any form of threat involving death or bodily harm to the president, president-elect or vice president constitutes a federal felony.
An illustrative case study is the 2017 incident involving comedian Kathy Griffin, who posed holding a bloody model of US President Donald Trump’s severed head. Griffin argued it was artistic satire, but she faced an immediate wave of repercussions — sponsors terminated their contracts with her, CNN ended its collaboration with her and canceled her role as a co-host for an upcoming New Year’s Eve special, her entertainment career collapsed overnight and she was subject to investigation by the US Secret Service.
The harshest criticism of Griffin did not come only from Trump’s Republican Party — even Democrats who shared the same political stance and opposed Trump distanced themselves from her, calling her actions “vile and wrong.” Her sponsors accused her of contravening their companies’ core values.
The responses to this incident were not in defense of Trump as an individual, but of the office of the US President — one that represents the very dignity of the nation’s institutions and democratic order. Griffin released a video apologizing for her actions, saying she had gone too far and crossed the line.
In the UK, a man who sent death threats to former British prime minister Theresa May and other politicians in 2020 was rebuked by the judge and sentenced to two years in prison. In France, a young man was charged with “individual terrorist activity” after threatening to kill French President Emmanuel Macron in a video game chatroom in 2017.
Violent threats against democratically elected leaders are, in essence, attacks on the entire democratic system. Every responsible political figure and citizen has a responsibility to stand up and defend the fundamental boundaries of that system, regardless of whether they agree with the current leader’s policies.
Let us return to Taiwan. In response to Chen’s remark about beheading Lai, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has remained silent, while the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) has voiced support. TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), a good friend of Chen’s, staged a ridiculous show of sympathy on Tuesday following the incident, saying that Chen just tends to speak his mind without filters. With his comments, Huang is putting his own private interests above public safety — brushing off a call for beheading the president as some sort of joke is, in effect, a way of encouraging extremist rhetoric.
In his live stream comments, Chen was directly targeting his Chinese audience — he even added: “I am waiting, brothers, I think about it day and night.” How is this any different from advocating for forced unification?
Lin Han is a junior-high school teacher.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In the past month, two important developments are poised to equip Taiwan with expanded capabilities to play foreign policy offense in an age where Taiwan’s diplomatic space is seriously constricted by a hegemonic Beijing. Taiwan Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) led a delegation of Taiwan and US companies to the Philippines to promote trilateral economic cooperation between the three countries. Additionally, in the past two weeks, Taiwan has placed chip export controls on South Africa in an escalating standoff over the placing of its diplomatic mission in Pretoria, causing the South Africans to pause and ask for consultations to resolve
An altercation involving a 73-year-old woman and a younger person broke out on a Taipei MRT train last week, with videos of the incident going viral online, sparking wide discussions about the controversial priority seats and social norms. In the video, the elderly woman, surnamed Tseng (曾), approached a passenger in a priority seat and demanded that she get up, and after she refused, she swung her bag, hitting her on the knees and calves several times. In return, the commuter asked a nearby passenger to hold her bag, stood up and kicked Tseng, causing her to fall backward and
In December 1937, Japanese troops captured Nanjing and unleashed one of the darkest chapters of the 20th century. Over six weeks, hundreds of thousands were slaughtered and women were raped on a scale that still defies comprehension. Across Asia, the Japanese occupation left deep scars. Singapore, Malaya, the Philippines and much of China endured terror, forced labor and massacres. My own grandfather was tortured by the Japanese in Singapore. His wife, traumatized beyond recovery, lived the rest of her life in silence and breakdown. These stories are real, not abstract history. Here is the irony: Mao Zedong (毛澤東) himself once told visiting
When I reminded my 83-year-old mother on Wednesday that it was the 76th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China, she replied: “Yes, it was the day when my family was broken.” That answer captures the paradox of modern China. To most Chinese in mainland China, Oct. 1 is a day of pride — a celebration of national strength, prosperity and global stature. However, on a deeper level, it is also a reminder to many of the families shattered, the freedoms extinguished and the lives sacrificed on the road here. Seventy-six years ago, Chinese Communist leader Mao Zedong (毛澤東)
RSS