Nvidia Corp’s plan to build its new headquarters at the Beitou Shilin Science Park’s T17 and T18 plots has stalled over a land rights dispute, prompting the Taipei City Government to propose the T12 plot as an alternative. The city government has also increased pressure on Shin Kong Life Insurance Co, which holds the development rights for the T17 and T18 plots.
The proposal is the latest by the city government over the past few months — and part of an ongoing negotiation strategy between the two sides. Whether Shin Kong Life Insurance backs down might be the key factor in determining whether Nvidia’s headquarters remains in Taipei.
Shin Kong Life Insurance has reportedly demanded NT$14 billion (US$459 million) in total compensation for terminating the development rights contracts — a figure that includes both royalties and the estimated revenues from the 50-year rights agreement it holds with the city government.
In turn, the Taipei City Government is attempting to toss the burden onto the Taipei City Council, suggesting that Shin Kong Life Insurance submit a formal proposal, cooperate with budget preparation and forward it for review — essentially asking councilors to play the role of bad cop. Aware that doing so would make it the target of fierce political attacks, Shin Kong Life Insurance knows well that such a path would lead to a dead end.
The Taipei City Government did not agree to Shin Kong Life Insurance’s proposal to hand the land rights directly over to Nvidia to handle the project after four years of stagnation, thereby blocking the insurer’s attempt to play landlord and collect rent risk-free — a decision that is legally justified.
The central government has already given the green light to reassign land development rights for special projects to designated enterprises following contract termination, making every possible effort to ensure that Nvidia gets its preferred location.
Whether by distancing itself and deflecting responsibility onto the city council, or by trying to keep the peace by offering alternative plots in the science park, the city government has demonstrated that it either does not dare or is unwilling to stand up to Shin Kong Life Insurance — thereby reinforcing Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) reputation as a weak and incapable leader.
Shin Kong Life Insurance also holds the rights to the build-and-operate project at Nangang Bus Station, which has similarly fallen far behind schedule. Chiang has many administrative tools at his disposal and ample room to maneuver.
Chiang could roll up his sleeves and step in, actively coordinating with representative organs to reach a consensus on reasonable terms of compensation that would allow the company a dignified way out. In the end, the other party would eventually understand that backing down would bring the best possible outcome for everyone involved.
The person least qualified to criticize others is former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲). As he once said in reference to the ongoing Core Pacific City corruption case, “letting go would have cost NT$10 billion.” Ko even sarcastically accused the prosecution of creating a chilling effect, saying: “How would Nvidia dare come here now?” His remarks completely distort the facts and blur right from wrong.
In September last year, the Taipei City Council’s special investigation team released the final draft of a report identifying eight major flaws in the Beitou Shilin Science Park project, accusing the Ko administration of “relaxing bidding conditions to favor specific conglomerates.” The Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office has since listed Ko as a defendant in a separate ongoing investigation.
However, with the Core Pacific City case dominating public attention, progress on the Beitou Shilin Science Park probe has gone largely unnoticed. Chiang should take the initiative and publicly pledge full cooperation with the investigation, as pressuring the judiciary to expedite the case could be another path to resolving the impasse.
The development project for Nvidia’s new headquarters must not become another Core Pacific City scandal that benefits only large conglomerates, nor should it devolve into a mismanaged and drawn-out mess, as was the case with the Taipei Dome.
If Taipei residents, Nvidia and Shin Kong Life Insurance all lose in the end — causing the city to miss out on massive opportunities in artificial intelligence infrastructure — then Chiang would go down in history as the man who delayed the transformation and modernization of our nation’s capital.
Chen Yung-chang is a freelance writer based in Taipei.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more