Youth-led protests across Asia in recent months have centered on corruption, elitism and censorship, but behind Gen Z’s anger lies something even more troubling — A staggering jobs crisis.
The generation born at about the turn of the century is facing a bleak economic future. A shrinking pool of jobs and the advance of artificial intelligence (AI) are weighing on their prospects. Left unaddressed, the demographic dividend (which refers to having more people in the workforce than dependents) that leaders like to tout as a guarantee of prosperity can just as easily become a trigger for unrest.
US President Donald Trump’s trade wars and a backlash against globalization are reshaping labor markets. Youth unemployment in parts of Asia is consistently two to three times higher than national averages, Morgan Stanley said in a report titled Asia Faces Rising Youth Unemployment Challenge. The few jobs available are too often precarious, underpaid or vanishing to automation.
The problem is particularly acute in the three most-populous nations, where economic growth is not being translated into enough new jobs to accommodate the millions of people who will be looking for work: China, India and Indonesia have youth unemployment rates of 16.5 percent, 17.6 percent and 17.3 percent respectively. By contrast, the US reports a rate of 10.5 percent.
Underemployment is widespread, too. Informal labor compounds the problem: More than half of Indonesia’s workers still rely on casual jobs. These positions are more likely to be irregular, offering little security and meager wages.
Insecurity over economic prospects was a major factor in the protests in Indonesia in August. Initially sparked by fury over perks for parliamentarians, they morphed into a broader outcry over inequality, highlighting the precarious conditions of millions of gig workers across the archipelago.
These problems are only likely to intensify because of the challenges posed by AI and automation. In India for instance, this could reduce job growth prospects, particularly in the information technology services sector, long a key source of employment for young people.
Textile factories and car plants, traditionally where many young Asians work, are also becoming increasingly automated. Worryingly, this is happening as tens of millions more people are expected to flood labor markets in the coming decade. India alone expects 84 million new entrants, while Indonesia would add 12.7 million, according to the Morgan Stanley report.
China has seen the number of new jobseekers swell, too. This year’s graduating class is the largest in history, the Asia Society said, with a cohort of more than 12 million students. They will be entering an employment market that is being disrupted by the brutal trade war with the US, and AI advances in almost every sector.
Protests are taking place in the world’s second-largest economy as well, despite Chinese Communist Party suppression. Many of these demonstrations are over the slowing economy, the China Dissent Monitor said. In the first half of this year, protests doubled from the same period last year.
For decades, Asia’s leaders have relied on strong growth to deliver stability, but expansion without jobs is not sustainable. Governments have to equip young people with new skills and create avenues to meaningful work. Education curricula need to shift from an overreliance on academics, to focus on entrepreneurship. Vocational training in trades and crafts would also be useful.
Reforms will be critical. China has been trying to shift the economy toward consumption and services for a while now, but has yet to achieve its goals, with exports contributing to almost one-third of growth during the first half of the year. India is one of the fastest-growing economies globally, but this pace is not enough to generate jobs. Growth would need to double, the Morgan Stanley report said, to address the underemployment challenge. Meanwhile, long-term growth in Southeast Asia’s largest economy is expected to miss government target of 8 percent as it faces a dual threat from cheap Chinese goods and US tariffs.
Policymakers in all three nations might ultimately need to turn to redistributive measures to avoid rising social unrest. These could include subsidies and expanding public-sector employment. Cash transfers cannot solve the problem long term, but they buy governments time.
Corruption and nepotism, long-entrenched in many Asian nations, also need to be addressed. Young people repeatedly cite these as sources of their anger. Without tackling these issues, even new jobs risk being seen as unfairly allocated.
Asia’s Gen Z protests are the early signs of a generation that feels hopeless. The test for the region’s governments would be whether they can provide their young people with not just work, but a future worth believing in.
Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC’s lead Asia presenter, and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS