When I first introduced artificial intelligence (AI) tools into my classrooms in Hsinchu and Taitung, I expected curiosity. What surprised me was how quickly students — and teachers — began reshaping the learning process. The faster we produced content, the faster AI produced alternatives, competing for attention.
However, AI has moved beyond novelty. It has become a coteacher, translator, creative partner and sometimes a mirror of what education is becoming. For English learners, AI’s instant translation, feedback and pronunciation support are transformative. Even kindergarten students use AI flashcards that adapt to their level, allowing them to listen, repeat and build confidence.
Back in 1997, I directed a play the slow way: every cue, line and prop handwritten. It was exhausting, but disciplined. Today, with AI, what took weeks can be generated in minutes — dialogue variations, stage prompts, even alternate endings. It does not replace vision or storytelling, but it lightens the load. Where once I dragged a boulder uphill, I now move with the current. Drama taught me meaning is forged through struggle; AI shows it can also emerge through collaboration between human imagination and machine speed.
AI’s baggage is real. Over-reliance can erode resilience, while surveillance fears raise the question: If AI can do it better, why try?
Yet those challenges create opportunities. We can use AI not just to provide answers, but to push learners to question, critique and stretch beyond the surface.
Ethical concerns remain — privacy, bias, the fine line between assistance and replacement. Teachers, once gatekeepers of knowledge, now serve as curators of how knowledge is applied.
For many Grade 7 students, writing a story in English feels impossible. Some freeze at the first line; others brim with ideas, but cannot form the sentences. To break the block, we used three drafts:
Outline in Chinese — students first shaped their ideas.
Translate and expand with AI — they translated the outline, then used AI to generate a short model paragraph.
Rewrite with their own voice — they rewrote the piece in their own words, borrowing only lightly from AI phrasing.
The results were striking. Hesitant writers gained confidence, and even those who struggled to start found they had something to say. AI did not replace their creativity — it gave them a foothold.
Going forward, AI would not just change what students learn, but how — and why. The memorization-heavy model might finally give way to skills that matter: critical thinking, cross-cultural communication and adaptability.
Taiwan, with its focus on bilingualism and cultural heritage, is uniquely positioned to show how AI can preserve identity while embracing innovation. Teachers would not disappear; they would become more vital. Our task is to humanize technology: to model empathy, guide ethical choices and help students interpret a flood of information. AI can draft essays, but it cannot nurture a child’s purpose or sense of belonging. That remains our domain.
I remind my students: “Language is the tool, culture is the canvas, purpose is the paint.”
AI adds brushes, but it is up to us to decide what picture we are painting.
Understanding AI is a marathon, not a sprint. At times, the most honest response is: “No meaning yet, not sure.” For now, I choose to observe and collect — because tomorrow’s classroom has already arrived.
Casper J. H. Keller is an educator with experience in Asia and Africa. He holds a master’s degree in education and an MBA, and is teaching English and drama at Yuemei Elementary School in Taitung County.
In the past month, two important developments are poised to equip Taiwan with expanded capabilities to play foreign policy offense in an age where Taiwan’s diplomatic space is seriously constricted by a hegemonic Beijing. Taiwan Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) led a delegation of Taiwan and US companies to the Philippines to promote trilateral economic cooperation between the three countries. Additionally, in the past two weeks, Taiwan has placed chip export controls on South Africa in an escalating standoff over the placing of its diplomatic mission in Pretoria, causing the South Africans to pause and ask for consultations to resolve
An altercation involving a 73-year-old woman and a younger person broke out on a Taipei MRT train last week, with videos of the incident going viral online, sparking wide discussions about the controversial priority seats and social norms. In the video, the elderly woman, surnamed Tseng (曾), approached a passenger in a priority seat and demanded that she get up, and after she refused, she swung her bag, hitting her on the knees and calves several times. In return, the commuter asked a nearby passenger to hold her bag, stood up and kicked Tseng, causing her to fall backward and
In December 1937, Japanese troops captured Nanjing and unleashed one of the darkest chapters of the 20th century. Over six weeks, hundreds of thousands were slaughtered and women were raped on a scale that still defies comprehension. Across Asia, the Japanese occupation left deep scars. Singapore, Malaya, the Philippines and much of China endured terror, forced labor and massacres. My own grandfather was tortured by the Japanese in Singapore. His wife, traumatized beyond recovery, lived the rest of her life in silence and breakdown. These stories are real, not abstract history. Here is the irony: Mao Zedong (毛澤東) himself once told visiting
When I reminded my 83-year-old mother on Wednesday that it was the 76th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China, she replied: “Yes, it was the day when my family was broken.” That answer captures the paradox of modern China. To most Chinese in mainland China, Oct. 1 is a day of pride — a celebration of national strength, prosperity and global stature. However, on a deeper level, it is also a reminder to many of the families shattered, the freedoms extinguished and the lives sacrificed on the road here. Seventy-six years ago, Chinese Communist leader Mao Zedong (毛澤東)
RSS