When I first introduced artificial intelligence (AI) tools into my classrooms in Hsinchu and Taitung, I expected curiosity. What surprised me was how quickly students — and teachers — began reshaping the learning process. The faster we produced content, the faster AI produced alternatives, competing for attention.
However, AI has moved beyond novelty. It has become a coteacher, translator, creative partner and sometimes a mirror of what education is becoming. For English learners, AI’s instant translation, feedback and pronunciation support are transformative. Even kindergarten students use AI flashcards that adapt to their level, allowing them to listen, repeat and build confidence.
Back in 1997, I directed a play the slow way: every cue, line and prop handwritten. It was exhausting, but disciplined. Today, with AI, what took weeks can be generated in minutes — dialogue variations, stage prompts, even alternate endings. It does not replace vision or storytelling, but it lightens the load. Where once I dragged a boulder uphill, I now move with the current. Drama taught me meaning is forged through struggle; AI shows it can also emerge through collaboration between human imagination and machine speed.
AI’s baggage is real. Over-reliance can erode resilience, while surveillance fears raise the question: If AI can do it better, why try?
Yet those challenges create opportunities. We can use AI not just to provide answers, but to push learners to question, critique and stretch beyond the surface.
Ethical concerns remain — privacy, bias, the fine line between assistance and replacement. Teachers, once gatekeepers of knowledge, now serve as curators of how knowledge is applied.
For many Grade 7 students, writing a story in English feels impossible. Some freeze at the first line; others brim with ideas, but cannot form the sentences. To break the block, we used three drafts:
Outline in Chinese — students first shaped their ideas.
Translate and expand with AI — they translated the outline, then used AI to generate a short model paragraph.
Rewrite with their own voice — they rewrote the piece in their own words, borrowing only lightly from AI phrasing.
The results were striking. Hesitant writers gained confidence, and even those who struggled to start found they had something to say. AI did not replace their creativity — it gave them a foothold.
Going forward, AI would not just change what students learn, but how — and why. The memorization-heavy model might finally give way to skills that matter: critical thinking, cross-cultural communication and adaptability.
Taiwan, with its focus on bilingualism and cultural heritage, is uniquely positioned to show how AI can preserve identity while embracing innovation. Teachers would not disappear; they would become more vital. Our task is to humanize technology: to model empathy, guide ethical choices and help students interpret a flood of information. AI can draft essays, but it cannot nurture a child’s purpose or sense of belonging. That remains our domain.
I remind my students: “Language is the tool, culture is the canvas, purpose is the paint.”
AI adds brushes, but it is up to us to decide what picture we are painting.
Understanding AI is a marathon, not a sprint. At times, the most honest response is: “No meaning yet, not sure.” For now, I choose to observe and collect — because tomorrow’s classroom has already arrived.
Casper J. H. Keller is an educator with experience in Asia and Africa. He holds a master’s degree in education and an MBA, and is teaching English and drama at Yuemei Elementary School in Taitung County.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking