US Customs and Border Protection (CPB) on Sept. 24 issued a Withhold and Release Order under Section 307 of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 — which prohibits imports of goods made with forced labor — targeting bicycles, bicycle parts and accessories manufactured by Giant, a Taiwanese bicycle brand. The measure applies only to the US market and does not affect exports to other regions.
However, it marks the first time that a Taiwanese manufacturer has faced sanctions due to concerns over forced labor — a warning for export competitiveness and institutional resilience.
The CPB has the authority to detain, exclude or seize goods at the border as long as it has reasonable suspicion that they involve forced labor. If a company wishes to regain market access, it has three months to provide “clear and convincing” evidence that its production processes are free of forced labor.
Observing international trends, the US typically adopts a “detain first, investigate later” enforcement model, whereas European countries emphasize prevention. Germany in 2023 implemented its Supply Chain Act, which requires large companies to establish oversight mechanisms. The EU has passed the Forced Labour Regulation and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, elevating human rights risk management to a shared obligation.
Japan in 2022 issued its Guidelines on Respecting Human Rights in Responsible Supply Chains, guiding companies to independently implement due diligence. These illustrate that the international market is moving toward robust governance, with human rights due diligence becoming a consensus.
Taiwan’s regulatory framework falls behind. Most companies only disclose information based on environmental, social and governance standards, placing a heavy focus on the environmental aspect while lacking comprehensive mechanisms for human rights and labor governance — a gap that poses risks for exports. The International Labour Organization (ILO) has outlined 11 indicators that can be used to identify forced labor. If regulators adopted and applied the indicators, Taiwanese products could face restrictions due to suspected forced labor.
Taiwan’s long-standing issues — high brokerage fees, overcrowded dormitories and excessive working hours — align with multiple ILO indicators, which only further amplifies the risk.
It is clear that neglecting labor governance can not only create human rights abuses, but also trade barriers, legal risks and market uncertainty. As the US attempts to reshore manufacturing, it is also employing legal tools to bolster human rights oversight.
Meanwhile, Europe is institutionalizing human rights governance through legislation. The developments indicate that the international community has upgraded labor standards to a prerequisite to market access. If Taiwan continues to delay reforms, the sanctions might not be limited to bicycles — other export industries could soon become the targets for scrutiny.
The Giant incident revealed that a sound framework for labor and supply chain governance is not just a matter of corporate responsibility, but a critical part of national strategy. As human rights protections evolve from ethical expectations to legal obligations and trade challenges, Taiwan can no longer afford to passively patch the holes — it must build robust defenses.
Only by accelerating the implementation of human rights due diligence systems and helping businesses pre-emptively identify and address risks can Taiwan improve its international reputation and lay a stable foundation for its industries.
Harper Chen is a youth adviser at the Executive Yuan and a licensed attorney in New York and Washington.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
RSS