The election campaign for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chair is heating up, with only 10 days left before party members cast their ballots on Oct. 18. The campaign has revealed potential strengths for the party going into important elections next year and in 2028, particularly the desire among leading candidates to deepen cooperation with the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). However, it has also exposed the party’s persistent weaknesses, especially in formulating a policy on cross-strait relations that can appeal to the majority of Taiwanese.
Six candidates are registered: former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), 73; former legislator Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), 56; Legislator Lo Chih-chiang (羅智強), 55; Sun Yat-sen School president Chang Ya-chung (張亞中), 71; former Changhua County commissioner Cho Po-yuan (卓伯源), 60; and legal academic Tsai Chih-hong (蔡志弘), 71. Among them, Hau — seen as an experienced, authoritative figure with broad appeal — and Cheng and Lo, regarded as representing the younger generation, have drawn the most attention. Chang, given his “deep blue” positions, is adding an extra dimension to the campaign by forcing the other candidates to engage with his hardline positions without alienating the KMT’s conservative voter base.
Party reform and the question of generational change have been important themes in the campaign. However, observers have noted that while every candidate has highlighted “reform” in their platform, most proposals are little more than procedural tinkering, avoiding the harder questions of factional patronage, reliance on local networks and how the KMT can become more appealing to mainstream society.
Nonetheless, a potential strength for the party is the agreement among leading candidates on the need to deepen cooperation with the TPP to defeat the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which points to widespread KMT recognition that it would struggle to win majority support alone. Lo has proposed detailed polling mechanisms to decide joint candidacies, while Cheng has called for institutionalizing the “blue-white” alliance and formally adopting a common rulebook. While questions remain over how far the TPP would be willing to integrate, the prospect of a deeper KMT-TPP alliance means the DPP could face tougher political contests next year and beyond.
However, the campaign has also highlighted the party’s persistent weakness: its inability to address the wide gap between public perceptions of China and the KMT’s own outlook. The candidates have largely ignored Beijing’s intensifying campaign of “hybrid warfare” and military pressure in the Taiwan Strait. Amid China’s growing military threats, they have offered little on strengthening ties with democratic partners and remain wedded to the widely questioned belief that Beijing can be deterred through exchanges alone.
Each leading candidate has presented themself not as a presidential candidate in their own right, but as a “kingmaker” for the party’s next nominee, with Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) widely regarded as the strongest hopeful. She declined to run for chair — citing a desire to focus on governance challenges in Taichung — but the more likely reason is that no serious national politician can afford to stake out positions on China in an internal KMT contest without jeopardizing their broader electability.
This has left the chair election as a battle among ideologues, competing over “one China” identity and ideological purity that is increasingly detached from mainstream public opinion.
The KMT appears stuck in a circular logic: a genuine reformer with presidential ambitions cannot win the chair without adopting positions that alienate mainstream voters, while only a hardline candidate can prevail internally, ensuring the party is unlikely to reform and broaden its appeal. Whether the next chair can break this cycle of contradictions remains to be seen.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS