OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently sat down for an interview with former Fox News host Tucker Carlson in which he openly acknowledged that ChatGPT’s model behavior is indeed influencing the entire world, and that he himself is responsible for the decisions related to the bot’s moral framework. He said that he has not had a good night of sleep since its launch, as the technology could bring about unpredictable consequences.
Although the discussion took place in the US, it is closely related to Taiwan. While Altman worries about the concentration of power, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has already weaponized artificial intelligence (AI), investing massive resources into developing deepfake technology, manipulating public opinion and generating disinformation.
From TikTok algorithms pushing pro-China content to anonymous online communities spreading rumors, and even AI automatically generating Hoklo-language (commonly known as Taiwanese) and Hakka-language pro-unification propaganda, the CCP’s cognitive warfare has already escalated to the point where it might even surpass our defenses.
Unfortunately, Taiwan lacks sufficient defensive capabilities. The country is surrounded by crises, caught in the midst of an asymmetric barrage.
First are the technological gaps — domestic systems for detecting and tracing disinformation are underdeveloped, and lack real-time monitoring and response capabilities.
Second are the regulatory gaps — there are no clear safety regulations surrounding generative AI, nor are there adequate interagency coordination mechanisms.
Finally, the public lacks the media literacy skills required to identify AI-generated disinformation — thus, it is easily manipulated.
The CCP possesses world-class language models and a massive online army. In contrast, Taiwan relies on a handful of non-governmental organizations, a few journalists and civil volunteers that strive to combat disinformation. It is not a fair fight, but a one-sided attack. Taiwan has no choice but to act immediately.
The country should start by establishing a real-time AI defense center in a collaborative effort between the Ministry of Digital Affairs, national security units, academic circles and civil society to monitor AI attacks and deepfake content by foreign entities.
The government should enact laws on AI information warfare defense to clearly define legal responsibilities and consequences for foreign hostile forces that employ AI in an attempt to interfere with elections and public opinion.
We must enhance the media literacy of all citizens by promoting deepfake detection education in schools and on social media platforms, helping the public to recognize AI-generated disinformation.
Taiwan must strengthen international cooperation by establishing a joint defense network with the US, Japan and Europe to share intelligence regarding AI attacks, and codevelop protective technologies.
Altman’s concerns are the concerns of all humanity — but for Taiwan, it is a matter of survival. If we do not swiftly establish defensive mechanisms, our nation’s elections, information warfare and even social order would be vulnerable to manipulation by foreign hostile forces using AI, which could ultimately lead us to lose a war without any bloodshed.
Hsiao Hsi-huei is a freelance writer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS