In 2021, a theft occurred in Xichang in China’s Sichuan Province. After the thief, a man surnamed He (何), was caught, he allegedly asked the police to arrange a meeting between himself and the victim, a woman surnamed Liu (柳).
Upon meeting her, He said: “I did not even want your money. It was just that the code for the lock on your front door was too simple. I was just messing around. If you had made it more complicated, I would not be sitting in jail right now.”
Stunned, Liu asked the thief how it could be her fault that she was robbed.
He replied: “I never said it was your fault, but we are both partially responsible. If you had installed your security properly, would I have been able to break into your house to steal your things?”
In July, a thief broke into a house in Suqian, in China’s Jiangsu Province. The homeowner locked the thief inside, and when he tried to escape, his head got stuck in the gap of the door and he had difficulty breathing. When the police arrived, they had to call the fire department to saw through the door’s metal frame and eventually rescued the man, who had nearly suffocated.
These stories are quite fitting analogies to describe the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). After recklessly forcing through an amendment to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法), the blue-white coalition celebrated, believing they had taken hold of a huge sum of money and paralyzed the government, killing two birds with one stone.
However, they recently realized that their formula was flawed — they failed to separate fiscal allocations for the three outlying counties from the 19 municipalities on Taiwan proper. As a result, the lump of taxpayers’ money they seized was not nearly as much as they originally anticipated.
Now, the KMT and TPP — the thieves — are shamelessly blaming the Executive Yuan for not warning them. They even rallied supporters to “order” the Executive Yuan to adjust the legislation to satisfy their original interests. They echo each other’s malicious deeds — behavior which is quite telling.
The laughable and ridiculous logic of the Sichuan thief is strikingly similar to that of the KMT and the TPP. They shamelessly tried and failed to steal money, shot themselves in the foot, then had the gall to blame the Executive Yuan for their absurd actions. On the other hand, their foolishness is on par with that of the thief in Jiangsu. The blue and white parties are barely hanging on — like a thief whose head is caught in a metal door.
The KMT and TPP should return to the correct path and put their effort toward doing something beneficial for Taiwan’s sustainable development.
Vincent Hong is a writer and technology industry retiree.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
RSS