From Nepal to Indonesia, Sri Lanka to Bangladesh, Asia’s youth are furious. Protests show a generation unwilling to accept inequality and injustice as their destiny, but for lasting political change to be achieved, this rage must be channeled into reform.
Raw anger is spilling out onto the streets. On Tuesday, Nepalese prime minister K.P. Sharma Oli resigned after two days of demonstrations over a sweeping social media ban. At least 19 people were killed and hundreds more injured after scores of “Gen-Z” protesters clashed with police. The ban was swiftly scrapped, but the disenchantment has continued. The army has stepped in, urging people to back down.
Young Nepalis are fed up. Blocking the apps was the immediate catalyst for their frustrations, another reminder of living under a government that is out of touch with their concerns. These platforms are critical tools in a country where about one in four people live below the national poverty line.
Illustration: Yusha
They are a way to receive remittances and stay in touch with friends and loved ones.
Indonesia has witnessed similar scenes. Late last month, outrage erupted after lawmakers were awarded lavish housing allowances — nearly 10 times the monthly minimum wage — while ordinary citizens grappled with soaring living costs. The death of a motorcycle taxi driver, run over by a police vehicle, further inflamed tensions.
Demonstrators looted the homes of top lawmakers, torched cars and vandalized government buildings, in some of the worst violence in decades. Under mounting pressure, Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto rolled back the perks, pledging greater accountability. On Monday last week, widely respected Indonesian minister of finance Sri Mulyani Indrawati was removed. It is speculated that she was sacrificed to calm public anger.
At first glance, these protests appear unconnected, but there are common grievances. These are both nations with young populations: About half of Indonesia’s total population is younger than 30, while in Nepal, it is around 56 percent. High unemployment rates are an issue, as is a widening income gap.
These demonstrations also highlight how collective youth action can force governments into retreat. Still, outrage alone is insufficient. Asia’s history of activism shows that demonstrations can topple leaders, but without meaningful political reforms, they rarely transform societies.
Bangladesh illustrates both promise and peril. A student-led uprising last year forced Sheikh Hasina — the longest-serving prime minister in Bangladesh’s history — to step down and flee the country. Hundreds died and many more were injured in the violence. The demonstrations led to a caretaker government helmed by Bangladeshi Interim Prime Minister and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Muhammad Yunus.
He has promised to restore order and rejuvenate democratic institutions, encouraging young people to get involved. Elections are expected early next year, but whether Bangladesh transforms into a functioning democracy would depend on how credible they are.
Sri Lanka’s experience is a cautionary tale. In 2022, a largely youth-led protest movement known as the Aragalaya, taking its name from the Sinhala word for struggle, forced the resignation of Sri Lankan president Gotabaya Rajapaksa. His incompetent nearly three-year rule ended with the nation defaulting on its debt in an unprecedented economic meltdown. The government’s foreign reserve crisis meant it was unable to pay for fuel imports, leading to long petrol lines and daily 13-hour power cuts.
However, the movement lacked a coherent long-term plan, and the old guard quickly regrouped. Ranil Wickremesinghe, another member of the discredited political elite, was installed as president.
Only last year did voters finally find an alternative, electing wildly popular Sri Lankan President Anura Kumara Dissanayake, eventually giving his National People’s Power coalition a parliamentary majority. His appeal lies partly in connecting with younger voters, offering a contrast to the cronyism and corruption of politicians from an earlier era.
Asia’s youth movements could draw lessons from farther afield. In New York, the meteoric rise of New York State Representative Zohran Mamdani from assemblyman to leading mayoral contender is notable. Using viral social media campaigns and policies that speak directly to young voters, Mamdani’s popularity stems from his authenticity, a sense that he empathizes with the people he says he wants to serve. This solutions-driven idealism has channeled what could have been rage into agency.
One name that has been mentioned as a potential leader in Nepal is Kathmandu Mayor Balendra Shah. The 35-year-old engineer-turned-rapper has impressed voters with his campaign to clean up the city’s waterways, while his songs have raised the issue of corruption and inequality in the Himalayan nation.
Protests have to evolve beyond the streets and into the places where power rests and policies are made. Demands should focus not simply on toppling corrupt politicians or torching government buildings, but on reforming courts, electoral commissions and creating independent watchdogs. Movements rooted solely among students or young people risk petering out after the anger fades. Building viable political parties or coalitions that can credibly contest elections is essential.
The Arab Spring offers sobering lessons. More than a decade ago, youthful revolts toppled governments from Tunisia to Egypt and Libya, but the movement collapsed and ended with worsening repression in parts of the region.
Protesting can be thrilling and a bit addictive — but it alone cannot be the endgame. Otherwise, this generation risks squandering its opportunity for change. Burned buildings and trashed department stores would only ensure the same power structures return, with a vengeance.
Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC’s lead Asia presenter and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Weeks into the craze, nobody quite knows what to make of the OpenClaw mania sweeping China, marked by viral photos of retirees lining up for installation events and users gathering in red claw hats. The queues and cosplay inspired by the “raising a lobster” trend make for irresistible China clickbait. However, the West is fixating on the least important part of the story. As a consumer craze, OpenClaw — the AI agent designed to do tasks on a user’s behalf — would likely burn out. Without some developer background, it is too glitchy and technically awkward for true mainstream adoption,
On Monday, a group of bipartisan US senators arrived in Taiwan to support the nation’s special defense bill to counter Chinese threats. At the same time, Beijing announced that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had invited Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) to visit China, a move to make the KMT a pawn in its proxy warfare against Taiwan and the US. Since her inauguration as KMT chair last year, Cheng, widely seen as a pro-China figure, has made no secret of her desire to interact with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and meet with Xi, naming it a
A delegation of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) officials led by Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is to travel to China tomorrow for a six-day visit to Jiangsu, Shanghai and Beijing, which might end with a meeting between Cheng and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The trip was announced by Xinhua news agency on Monday last week, which cited China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) Director Song Tao (宋濤) as saying that Cheng has repeatedly expressed willingness to visit China, and that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee and Xi have extended an invitation. Although some people have been speculating about a potential Xi-Cheng
The ongoing Iran conflict is putting Taiwan’s energy fragility on full display — the island of 23 million people, home to the world’s most advanced semiconductor manufacturing, is highly dependent on imported oil and gas, especially that from the Middle East. In 2025, 69.6 percent of Taiwan’s crude oil and 38.7 percent of liquified natural gas were sourced from the Middle East. In the same year, 62 percent of crude oil and 34 percent of LNG to Taiwan went through the Strait of Hormuz. Taiwan’s state-run oil company CPC Corp’s benchmark crude oil price (70 percent Dubai, 30 percent Brent)