In the aftermath of Israeli airstrikes targeting Hamas negotiators in the heart of Qatar’s capital, Doha, the White House appeared sidelined from halting a conflict that US President Donald Trump has claimed only he could mediate.
As details of the diplomatic flurry before Tuesday’s extraordinary strike were revealed, it was claimed that the White House had little say in how Israel opened its latest front in its war against Hamas — this one on a US ally hosting negotiations days after Trump had claimed he was close to reaching a deal.
Instead, the Trump administration appears once again to have been caught by surprise, as with Israel’s strikes in June against Iranian military and nuclear program targets that upended US efforts to negotiate a new nuclear deal with Tehran.
US officials said warnings of the impending strikes on Qatar came so late that US officials were only informed of the attack by the time that Israeli F-16 jets were already en route to the Gulf.
Whether or not the US had closer coordination with the Israelis on the strike than admitted, the White House only informed Qatari officials of the attack 10 minutes after it had begun, Qatar’s prime minister said on Tuesday.
“I immediately directed Special Envoy Steve Witkoff to inform the Qataris of the impending attack, which he did, however, unfortunately, too late to stop the attack,” Trump said in a statement.
By Tuesday afternoon, the White House was caught between a policy of supporting Israel’s war against Hamas and of patching up relations with a key US ally in the region with close ties to his administration, in particular Witkoff.
The tightrope walk that the administration is performing was apparent on Tuesday, as White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt issued a condemnation and justification of the strike, in a statement that appeared desperate to keep the Qatari government onside.
“Unilaterally bombing inside Qatar, a sovereign nation and close ally of the United States that is working very hard and bravely taking risks with us to broker peace, does not advance Israel or America’s goals,” Leavitt said from the podium of the White House press room.
However, she added a tacit endorsement of the strike, saying: “Eliminating Hamas, who have profited off the misery of those living in Gaza, is a worthy goal.”
The strikes could mark the end of the ceasefire negotiation process in Qatar, which has mediated talks between Israel and Hamas for nearly two years.
Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani on Tuesday said that the country would continue to mediate between Israel and Hamas, but “for current talks, I do not think there’s something valid right now after what we saw from today’s attack.”
“It is difficult to imagine the Qataris picking up where they left off,” Council on Foreign Relations senior fellow Steven Cook said. “From Doha’s perspective, Qatar has exerted considerable effort to release Israeli hostages only to be repaid with an airstrike on their country.”
Egypt could act as mediator instead, but it is a “thankless task” when “neither the Israeli government nor the Hamas leadership seem interested in a deal,” Cook said.
“I think it really calls into question what is prime minister [Benjamin] Netanyahu’s intention,” Israel Policy Forum Washington Managing Director and senior fellow Rachel Brandenburg said during an episode of a podcast hosted by War on the Rocks. “If he is really serious about negotiations and is serious about ending the war, then why strike the political leaders who are negotiating?”
Despite questions about Qatar’s influence on Hamas and whether the militant group’s leaders could negotiate in good faith, “you need someone to mediate and you need someone to negotiate with and this makes that conversation a lot more difficult,” she said.
Qatar was also caught in the crossfire in the aftermath of a US strike on Iranian nuclear facilities in June, as a US military base in the Gulf country was targeted by an Iranian missile barrage that was easily parried by US missile defense systems.
Trump on Tuesday said that he had assured the prime minister and Qatari Emir Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani that “such a thing will not happen again on their soil.”
However, Israel has suggested otherwise. After Algeria called an emergency session of the UN Security Council, Israeli Ambassador to the UN Danny Danon said: “There will be no immunity for terrorists — not in Gaza, Lebanon or in Qatar.”
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
The saga of Sarah Dzafce, the disgraced former Miss Finland, is far more significant than a mere beauty pageant controversy. It serves as a potent and painful contemporary lesson in global cultural ethics and the absolute necessity of racial respect. Her public career was instantly pulverized not by a lapse in judgement, but by a deliberate act of racial hostility, the flames of which swiftly encircled the globe. The offensive action was simple, yet profoundly provocative: a 15-second video in which Dzafce performed the infamous “slanted eyes” gesture — a crude, historically loaded caricature of East Asian features used in Western
The Executive Yuan and the Presidential Office on Monday announced that they would not countersign or promulgate the amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) passed by the Legislative Yuan — a first in the nation’s history and the ultimate measure the central government could take to counter what it called an unconstitutional legislation. Since taking office last year, the legislature — dominated by the opposition alliance of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party — has passed or proposed a slew of legislation that has stirred controversy and debate, such as extending
RSS