In the aftermath of Israeli airstrikes targeting Hamas negotiators in the heart of Qatar’s capital, Doha, the White House appeared sidelined from halting a conflict that US President Donald Trump has claimed only he could mediate.
As details of the diplomatic flurry before Tuesday’s extraordinary strike were revealed, it was claimed that the White House had little say in how Israel opened its latest front in its war against Hamas — this one on a US ally hosting negotiations days after Trump had claimed he was close to reaching a deal.
Instead, the Trump administration appears once again to have been caught by surprise, as with Israel’s strikes in June against Iranian military and nuclear program targets that upended US efforts to negotiate a new nuclear deal with Tehran.
US officials said warnings of the impending strikes on Qatar came so late that US officials were only informed of the attack by the time that Israeli F-16 jets were already en route to the Gulf.
Whether or not the US had closer coordination with the Israelis on the strike than admitted, the White House only informed Qatari officials of the attack 10 minutes after it had begun, Qatar’s prime minister said on Tuesday.
“I immediately directed Special Envoy Steve Witkoff to inform the Qataris of the impending attack, which he did, however, unfortunately, too late to stop the attack,” Trump said in a statement.
By Tuesday afternoon, the White House was caught between a policy of supporting Israel’s war against Hamas and of patching up relations with a key US ally in the region with close ties to his administration, in particular Witkoff.
The tightrope walk that the administration is performing was apparent on Tuesday, as White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt issued a condemnation and justification of the strike, in a statement that appeared desperate to keep the Qatari government onside.
“Unilaterally bombing inside Qatar, a sovereign nation and close ally of the United States that is working very hard and bravely taking risks with us to broker peace, does not advance Israel or America’s goals,” Leavitt said from the podium of the White House press room.
However, she added a tacit endorsement of the strike, saying: “Eliminating Hamas, who have profited off the misery of those living in Gaza, is a worthy goal.”
The strikes could mark the end of the ceasefire negotiation process in Qatar, which has mediated talks between Israel and Hamas for nearly two years.
Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani on Tuesday said that the country would continue to mediate between Israel and Hamas, but “for current talks, I do not think there’s something valid right now after what we saw from today’s attack.”
“It is difficult to imagine the Qataris picking up where they left off,” Council on Foreign Relations senior fellow Steven Cook said. “From Doha’s perspective, Qatar has exerted considerable effort to release Israeli hostages only to be repaid with an airstrike on their country.”
Egypt could act as mediator instead, but it is a “thankless task” when “neither the Israeli government nor the Hamas leadership seem interested in a deal,” Cook said.
“I think it really calls into question what is prime minister [Benjamin] Netanyahu’s intention,” Israel Policy Forum Washington Managing Director and senior fellow Rachel Brandenburg said during an episode of a podcast hosted by War on the Rocks. “If he is really serious about negotiations and is serious about ending the war, then why strike the political leaders who are negotiating?”
Despite questions about Qatar’s influence on Hamas and whether the militant group’s leaders could negotiate in good faith, “you need someone to mediate and you need someone to negotiate with and this makes that conversation a lot more difficult,” she said.
Qatar was also caught in the crossfire in the aftermath of a US strike on Iranian nuclear facilities in June, as a US military base in the Gulf country was targeted by an Iranian missile barrage that was easily parried by US missile defense systems.
Trump on Tuesday said that he had assured the prime minister and Qatari Emir Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani that “such a thing will not happen again on their soil.”
However, Israel has suggested otherwise. After Algeria called an emergency session of the UN Security Council, Israeli Ambassador to the UN Danny Danon said: “There will be no immunity for terrorists — not in Gaza, Lebanon or in Qatar.”
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) is expected to be summoned by the Taipei City Police Department after a rally in Taipei on Saturday last week resulted in injuries to eight police officers. The Ministry of the Interior on Sunday said that police had collected evidence of obstruction of public officials and coercion by an estimated 1,000 “disorderly” demonstrators. The rally — led by Huang to mark one year since a raid by Taipei prosecutors on then-TPP chairman and former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — might have contravened the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法), as the organizers had
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
RSS