Taipei Municipal Zhongshan Girls High School only allows each class to order food delivery to the school once a month. To fight for greater rights to order meals, some students have launched a protest movement, eating lunch in front of the principal’s office. In response, doctor Shen Chen-lan (沈政男) praised the students’ bravery, and asked: “What are the teachers and school afraid of?”
Actually, the school policy is not a matter of fear, but a matter of safety management and campus order. The main entrance to Taipei First Girls High School is often blocked by food couriers during lunchtime. Some couriers even put lunchboxes inside a public phone booth by the entrance. It is far better for students to try to pack their own lunchboxes at home, thereby cultivating their ability to do housework. This is part and parcel of their education.
The school song encourages students to prepare themselves for the responsibilities of “managing family and state affairs,” an idea that appears in other schools’ songs, too. Why do students only know how to sing the songs, but not how to follow their advice?
In Japan, high-school students generally do not order food delivery to school. Most Japanese high schools do not allow ordering food delivery, as it impacts safety management and campus order, not to mention that such food is expensive.
Moreover, many Japanese public high schools do not have cafeterias, so students bring their own lunches, mostly prepared by their parents or themselves. Some schools have snack bars selling bread and rice balls on campus. Only a few private or large high schools have canteens that provide set meals, ramen noodles or curry rice.
Finally, there are the cultural factors. In Japan, students are generally expected to be frugal and follow the rules. Ordering food delivery is often considered an adult’s or office worker’s behavior.
Naturally, there are exceptions, as some more liberal high schools allow students to dine off-campus or order food delivery. During extracurricular activities or exam periods, teachers might also allow delivery of pizza or boxed lunches, but this is not commonly seen.
Teng Hon-yuan is a university professor.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS