Taipei Municipal Zhongshan Girls High School only allows each class to order food delivery to the school once a month. To fight for greater rights to order meals, some students have launched a protest movement, eating lunch in front of the principal’s office. In response, doctor Shen Chen-lan (沈政男) praised the students’ bravery, and asked: “What are the teachers and school afraid of?”
Actually, the school policy is not a matter of fear, but a matter of safety management and campus order. The main entrance to Taipei First Girls High School is often blocked by food couriers during lunchtime. Some couriers even put lunchboxes inside a public phone booth by the entrance. It is far better for students to try to pack their own lunchboxes at home, thereby cultivating their ability to do housework. This is part and parcel of their education.
The school song encourages students to prepare themselves for the responsibilities of “managing family and state affairs,” an idea that appears in other schools’ songs, too. Why do students only know how to sing the songs, but not how to follow their advice?
In Japan, high-school students generally do not order food delivery to school. Most Japanese high schools do not allow ordering food delivery, as it impacts safety management and campus order, not to mention that such food is expensive.
Moreover, many Japanese public high schools do not have cafeterias, so students bring their own lunches, mostly prepared by their parents or themselves. Some schools have snack bars selling bread and rice balls on campus. Only a few private or large high schools have canteens that provide set meals, ramen noodles or curry rice.
Finally, there are the cultural factors. In Japan, students are generally expected to be frugal and follow the rules. Ordering food delivery is often considered an adult’s or office worker’s behavior.
Naturally, there are exceptions, as some more liberal high schools allow students to dine off-campus or order food delivery. During extracurricular activities or exam periods, teachers might also allow delivery of pizza or boxed lunches, but this is not commonly seen.
Teng Hon-yuan is a university professor.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS