Taipei Municipal Zhongshan Girls High School only allows each class to order food delivery to the school once a month. To fight for greater rights to order meals, some students have launched a protest movement, eating lunch in front of the principal’s office. In response, doctor Shen Chen-lan (沈政男) praised the students’ bravery, and asked: “What are the teachers and school afraid of?”
Actually, the school policy is not a matter of fear, but a matter of safety management and campus order. The main entrance to Taipei First Girls High School is often blocked by food couriers during lunchtime. Some couriers even put lunchboxes inside a public phone booth by the entrance. It is far better for students to try to pack their own lunchboxes at home, thereby cultivating their ability to do housework. This is part and parcel of their education.
The school song encourages students to prepare themselves for the responsibilities of “managing family and state affairs,” an idea that appears in other schools’ songs, too. Why do students only know how to sing the songs, but not how to follow their advice?
In Japan, high-school students generally do not order food delivery to school. Most Japanese high schools do not allow ordering food delivery, as it impacts safety management and campus order, not to mention that such food is expensive.
Moreover, many Japanese public high schools do not have cafeterias, so students bring their own lunches, mostly prepared by their parents or themselves. Some schools have snack bars selling bread and rice balls on campus. Only a few private or large high schools have canteens that provide set meals, ramen noodles or curry rice.
Finally, there are the cultural factors. In Japan, students are generally expected to be frugal and follow the rules. Ordering food delivery is often considered an adult’s or office worker’s behavior.
Naturally, there are exceptions, as some more liberal high schools allow students to dine off-campus or order food delivery. During extracurricular activities or exam periods, teachers might also allow delivery of pizza or boxed lunches, but this is not commonly seen.
Teng Hon-yuan is a university professor.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
The saga of Sarah Dzafce, the disgraced former Miss Finland, is far more significant than a mere beauty pageant controversy. It serves as a potent and painful contemporary lesson in global cultural ethics and the absolute necessity of racial respect. Her public career was instantly pulverized not by a lapse in judgement, but by a deliberate act of racial hostility, the flames of which swiftly encircled the globe. The offensive action was simple, yet profoundly provocative: a 15-second video in which Dzafce performed the infamous “slanted eyes” gesture — a crude, historically loaded caricature of East Asian features used in Western
The Executive Yuan and the Presidential Office on Monday announced that they would not countersign or promulgate the amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) passed by the Legislative Yuan — a first in the nation’s history and the ultimate measure the central government could take to counter what it called an unconstitutional legislation. Since taking office last year, the legislature — dominated by the opposition alliance of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party — has passed or proposed a slew of legislation that has stirred controversy and debate, such as extending