At the beginning of this semester, Taiwan is experiencing something of a “teacher drought,” which is affecting schools at all levels, rural and urban, from elementary to high-school level.
This is not only a staffing problem; it is due to a structural flaw in the education system. The gradual exodus of teachers would have a serious effect on the future of the country.
There are several underlying reasons behind the teacher shortage. First, the profession is no longer attractive. Teaching used to be considered an “iron rice bowl” occupation, but it is no more due to major pension reforms, salary stagnation and loss of social status. Teachers find themselves reported for trivial reasons, and overblown media reports and criticism from the public have forced passionate educational talents to quit.
Then there are misplaced policies. In the past few years, education authorities have repeatedly pushed for “highlight policies” that are often disconnected with the educational climate. While ostensibly caring about students’ well-being, they have only served to increase the administrative burden.
Temporary remedies have caused a vicious cycle to develop. To ensure that schools can open, education authorities have lowered the hiring threshold, allowing those without teacher training to enter the profession, rehiring retired teachers and even forcing current teachers to work overtime on a regular basis.
Another problem is the imbalance between supply and demand. There is a serious teacher shortage in some subjects — especially in more specialist fields such as physics, chemistry and information technology — as many potential teachers would rather turn to the high-paying technology industry. However, supply exceeds demand in other subjects, thus forcing many to give up after trying hard for years to pass the teacher exams.
However, within any crisis lies opportunity, and the combined impact of the declining birthrate and the teacher shortage might force society to rethink the nature of education. If we seize the chance to adjust education policies, it is still possible to reverse the unfavorable situation.
First, it is necessary to rebuild the status of teachers. Respecting professionalism is not a slogan, but to build institutional protection to prevent teachers from being sued recklessly and to evade unnecessary government intervention. If the Ministry of Education could emphasize the irreplaceability of the teaching profession restore respect for teachers, it would allow outstanding talents to return to schools.
The administrative workload should be reduced, so they can devote their energy to teaching. This means that it is necessary to thoroughly review the “highlight policies” that appear glamorous, but do little to help, minimizing administrative duties and the need to endlessly fill out forms. If teachers could devote more energy to curriculum design and student care, the quality of education would improve.
The teacher training and selection system should be amended to achieve a balance between supply and demand. Data analysis should be employed to predict teacher demand, and flexible channels for further education and job transfers should also be provided. Meanwhile, the monthly salary of “supply teachers” should be raised equal to others, and their seniority should be counted, so the large amount of supply teachers who have long supported the educational scene could have stable careers, too.
Education should return to neutrality and professionalism, and politics should, as much as possible, be kept away. Education should not be a stage for political grandstanding. Only by adhering to professional governance could the education ministry regain trust.
Chang Ruay-shiung is the president of National Taipei University of Business.
Translated by Eddy Chang
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
On Monday last week, American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) Director Raymond Greene met with Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers to discuss Taiwan-US defense cooperation, on the heels of a separate meeting the previous week with Minister of National Defense Minister Wellington Koo (顧立雄). Departing from the usual convention of not advertising interactions with senior national security officials, the AIT posted photos of both meetings on Facebook, seemingly putting the ruling and opposition parties on public notice to obtain bipartisan support for Taiwan’s defense budget and other initiatives. Over the past year, increasing Taiwan’s defense budget has been a sore spot
Media said that several pan-blue figures — among them former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), former KMT legislator Lee De-wei (李德維), former KMT Central Committee member Vincent Hsu (徐正文), New Party Chairman Wu Cheng-tien (吳成典), former New Party legislator Chou chuan (周荃) and New Party Deputy Secretary-General You Chih-pin (游智彬) — yesterday attended the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) military parade commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. China’s Xinhua news agency reported that foreign leaders were present alongside Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), such as Russian President Vladimir Putin, North Korean leader Kim
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) is expected to be summoned by the Taipei City Police Department after a rally in Taipei on Saturday last week resulted in injuries to eight police officers. The Ministry of the Interior on Sunday said that police had collected evidence of obstruction of public officials and coercion by an estimated 1,000 “disorderly” demonstrators. The rally — led by Huang to mark one year since a raid by Taipei prosecutors on then-TPP chairman and former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — might have contravened the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法), as the organizers had