On Wednesday last week, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) held a military parade to commemorate the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. Following the event, many supporters of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) praised the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) soldiers’ goose-stepping, saying that their skilled marching indicated that the military has strong combat capabilities — some even went so far as to question how Taiwan could possibly fight back against it. The arguments were spouted with great fervor, despite being entirely nonsensical.
If decent goose-stepping equals strong combat capabilities, then North Korea’s military should be ranked first in the world — after all, its goose-stepping surpasses China’s. On the other hand, the US — the world’s top military force — has never goose-stepped. By those standards, the US would not even make it onto the list. That alone illustrates the absurdity of using goose-stepping to measure military strength.
The US military is the strongest in the world, demonstrated by its contributions to defeating the Axis powers during WWII. Throughout the war, the US served as the arsenal and food supply for the Allied powers. Without US support, the Axis powers likely would have conquered the world. Today, the US is even more powerful — and its military still does not goose-step.
During the war, CCP forces fought little against Japan. Yet today, the CCP shamelessly claims credit for victory. The KMT — also fond of military parades — is no different. Throughout the war, the CCP and KMT continued fighting among themselves and scrambling for territory, but they never recovered the lost land. If the US had not dropped two atomic bombs on Japan, which country would dare claim that it defeated Japan on its own?
Twenty-five years ago, the West was already discussing the “third wave” of the military affairs revolution — the modernization of warfare through advances in information technology, precision weapons and the exploitation of networks. Now, rapid developments in artificial intelligence are being hailed as the fourth wave. However, the blue and white camps are still lost in their nostalgia for goose-stepping and bayonet drills — truly behind the times. No matter how well your army marches, if it cannot handle combat, it is ultimately useless.
Teng Hon-yuan is a university professor.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS