On Wednesday last week, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) held a military parade to commemorate the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. Following the event, many supporters of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) praised the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) soldiers’ goose-stepping, saying that their skilled marching indicated that the military has strong combat capabilities — some even went so far as to question how Taiwan could possibly fight back against it. The arguments were spouted with great fervor, despite being entirely nonsensical.
If decent goose-stepping equals strong combat capabilities, then North Korea’s military should be ranked first in the world — after all, its goose-stepping surpasses China’s. On the other hand, the US — the world’s top military force — has never goose-stepped. By those standards, the US would not even make it onto the list. That alone illustrates the absurdity of using goose-stepping to measure military strength.
The US military is the strongest in the world, demonstrated by its contributions to defeating the Axis powers during WWII. Throughout the war, the US served as the arsenal and food supply for the Allied powers. Without US support, the Axis powers likely would have conquered the world. Today, the US is even more powerful — and its military still does not goose-step.
During the war, CCP forces fought little against Japan. Yet today, the CCP shamelessly claims credit for victory. The KMT — also fond of military parades — is no different. Throughout the war, the CCP and KMT continued fighting among themselves and scrambling for territory, but they never recovered the lost land. If the US had not dropped two atomic bombs on Japan, which country would dare claim that it defeated Japan on its own?
Twenty-five years ago, the West was already discussing the “third wave” of the military affairs revolution — the modernization of warfare through advances in information technology, precision weapons and the exploitation of networks. Now, rapid developments in artificial intelligence are being hailed as the fourth wave. However, the blue and white camps are still lost in their nostalgia for goose-stepping and bayonet drills — truly behind the times. No matter how well your army marches, if it cannot handle combat, it is ultimately useless.
Teng Hon-yuan is a university professor.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS