The post-game analysis of this week’s gathering near Beijing of non-Western leaders is in. The spectacle of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Russian President Vladimir Putin holding hands, hugging and sharing rides was judged by some as marking a transformative shift in global alliances, and by others as theater, but perhaps they miss the point. We should be judging Xi’s show of strength by its ability to contrast with the chaos and weakness among his competitors in the US and Europe.
What emerged from Monday’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit was, in concrete terms, thin gruel: A development fund without details or monetary commitments, to be put at the service of a military network that lacks either a collective defense clause or joint command structure. The more substantive message probably came a day later, as Xi oversaw a display of Chinese military power, flanked by Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, two outlaws of the liberal, US-led order he seeks to destroy.
No photo op or rhetoric can disguise the fact that India — Xi’s trophy guest at the SCO — remains threatened by China, even as it tries (and likely fails) to achieve some form of detente. The two countries have long-standing border disputes that turned violent as recently as 2020-2021.
Just as worrying for New Delhi is that Beijing has become the chief supplier of arms and economic support to Pakistan, India’s nemesis. In May, Islamabad used Chinese fighter jets and PL-15 air-to-air missiles that outrange their US equivalent to humiliate India’s air force, downing brand new French Rafales. So while India may be the world’s most populous nation and a future superpower, it still needs the US.
Putin is now so dependent on Beijing and so overstretched by his invasion of Ukraine that Moscow can offer little of the counterbalance it did through much of the Soviet era. In fact, India’s military is so overmatched by China’s that its dependence on US arms and backing in some ways echoes Europe’s.
Again, this misses the point. It is less important how fast or effectively China is building its alternative to the US-dominated international systems than that its actions are coherent and have an achievable trajectory. This is what Monday’s SCO diplomacy and Wednesday’s military parade achieved. In the process, they highlighted the contradictory, if not self-destructive, trade and foreign policies of the US administration. While European policy goals might be more consistent, they are unachievable absent US support (and therefore largely irrelevant).
How much sense does it make to compare the SCO’s lack of a collective defense commitment with NATO’s Article 5, when US President Donald Trump has been busy chipping away at the provision’s credibility, and Xi and Kim are supplying Putin with critical components, troops, arms and munitions to fight his war? Why does China need joint command structures to aid Russia in Ukraine, especially as the US defunds its support for Kyiv and Europe is unable to fill the gap? A British or French military parade held after China’s would be painful to watch.
Modi and other leaders who showed up in Tianjin are far from naive enough to believe Xi’s rhetoric of equality (or even democracy) among states, his offer of “win-win” solutions, or claimed disinterest in establishing Chinese hegemony. How they react — by submitting or building up the defenses needed to ensure independence — depends on finding a backer capable of deterring Chinese predations. The US no longer looks like a reliable bet.
If there is any strategic case to be made for Trump’s effective abandonment of Ukraine, it would be as a step toward repairing US relations with Russia to peel it away from China, the US’ only true peer rival. That would severely misinterpret Putin, but it seems unlikely ever to have been a serious US policy goal, given the administration’s willingness to drive Modi, quite literally, into Xi’s arms.
The importance of China’s summitry should not be measured just by how well it did in building the financial institutions and military alliances it wants to replace. Some version of a new Chinese order will come, whether regional or global. Judge it instead by the mirror it has held up to the chaos in Washington and Europe. India, Egypt, Turkey, Vietnam and other nations either at or watching Xi’s show would draw their own conclusions.
Marc Champion is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Europe, Russia and the Middle East. He was previously Istanbul bureau chief for the Wall Street Journal. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
On Monday last week, American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) Director Raymond Greene met with Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers to discuss Taiwan-US defense cooperation, on the heels of a separate meeting the previous week with Minister of National Defense Minister Wellington Koo (顧立雄). Departing from the usual convention of not advertising interactions with senior national security officials, the AIT posted photos of both meetings on Facebook, seemingly putting the ruling and opposition parties on public notice to obtain bipartisan support for Taiwan’s defense budget and other initiatives. Over the past year, increasing Taiwan’s defense budget has been a sore spot
Media said that several pan-blue figures — among them former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), former KMT legislator Lee De-wei (李德維), former KMT Central Committee member Vincent Hsu (徐正文), New Party Chairman Wu Cheng-tien (吳成典), former New Party legislator Chou chuan (周荃) and New Party Deputy Secretary-General You Chih-pin (游智彬) — yesterday attended the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) military parade commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. China’s Xinhua news agency reported that foreign leaders were present alongside Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), such as Russian President Vladimir Putin, North Korean leader Kim
RSS