The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus recently announced that, following the Aug. 23 referendum, it would begin to promote amendments to the Act Governing Civil Servants’ Retirement, Discharge and Pensions (公務人員退休資遣撫卹法) that would stop incremental pension cuts for civil servants, teachers and military personnel — just as they previously did for police and firefighters — allowing them to retain the 80 percent replacement rate.
A Ministry of Civil Service report said that if the KMT were to successfully pass these pension system reforms, the Public Service Pension Fund could go bankrupt four to five years earlier than previously anticipated. That would greatly affect the retirement benefits of employees, as there would no longer be sufficient funds available for their pensions upon retirement.
Despite significant resistance, reforms to the pension system for civil servants, teachers and military personnel were successfully implemented under former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration. That helped to reduce the nation’s expenditure on pensions for civil servants and addressed the issue of the pension fund’s looming bankruptcy crisis.
As the saying goes, one generation plants the trees so the next can enjoy the shade — it is not acceptable for the next generation to chop down the trees, leaving everyone without shelter or support.
It is not the government’s sole responsibility to generously scatter riches. Spending money is easy, but living within one’s own means requires determination and perseverance. These two opposing attitudes determine the political landscape.
Tsai’s re-election in 2020 demonstrated that a majority of Taiwanese were accepting of the government’s pension reform plan. In contrast, the KMT — driven by selfish political interests — is now pushing to amend the law to cancel the pension cuts, completely disregarding the long-term health and sustainability of the nation’s finances.
Insisting on going against the will of the majority is tantamount to fueling national division and instability. Although public-sector employees saw a reduction in their pensions as a result of the Tsai-era reforms, the monthly amount they receive after retirement still exceeds that of the average Taiwanese worker. This alone illustrates that the reforms were a prudent and just measure that carefully balances the reasonable living needs of different groups and generations.
The hard-won, stable and fair pension reforms should not be undone, nor should they be used to sow division.
Chen Chi-nung is a political commentator.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS