Following the defeat of the recall campaigns, President William Lai (賴清德) met with former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文). Their meeting led me to reflect on Tsai’s tenure: a globally lauded success in pandemic control, yet a dismal performance in the 2022 local elections, which reduced the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to governing only one-quarter of Taiwan’s municipalities.
Furthermore, in last year’s legislative elections, the DPP lost its majority, and Lai’s presidential vote slipped to 40 percent, setting the stage for legislative gridlock.
Tsai’s administration was praised internationally, yet it suffered crushing domestic defeats.
This was due to a failure to firmly implement crucial policies such as transitional justice and judicial reform. The administration lacked the talent, planning and most importantly, the ability to effectively execute government directives. At its core, it missed the mark in addressing the electorate’s underlying expectations.
Contentious policies — such as the abolition of the death penalty and legalizing same-sex marriage, which faced significant resistance — were pushed through with little time for a consensus to form.
Although those reforms were applauded abroad, they sparked profound distaste at home.
Efforts toward carbon reduction and green energy — although necessary — were marred by poor planning and implementation. Officials failed to communicate the policies in an accessible and convincing manner to the public.
The disconnect between the administration and the public became focal points for critique, prompting grassroots supporters to drift away from the DPP, a sentiment that remains unresolved.
Moreover, administrations have turned a blind eye to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) cognitive warfare, allowing their influence to take root and grow.
Statements by Tsai during her presidency such as: “Nobody should apologize for their identity,” and “anyone who comes to Taiwan is Taiwanese, hence they should be able to enjoy everything [rights] that we have,” risked blurring the line of national identity and weakening the mental fortifications of citizens.
Beijing’s tactics have become multifaceted: group trips for Taiwanese local politicians, promoting Taiwan-China tourism, staging cross-strait youth exchange programs, inviting Taiwanese politicians to speak on Chinese state media, and deploying platforms such as TikTok, Xiaohongshu (known in English as RedNote) and e-commerce sites.
Under this sustained campaign, many Taiwanese have come to view peaceful unification as a benign option, blindly believing that CCP rule would not be as oppressive as the DPP cautions.
Taiwanese nationalists have identified this psychological hazard and sounded the alarm to mobilize resistance. However, the CCP’s long-term infiltration has quietly ensnared the public.
Anti-CCP efforts are now often misconstrued as sowing hatred, provoking cross-strait conflict or destabilizing society, and are met with public aversion.
In the recall campaign, the electorate was persuaded, voicing their detest for the chaos caused by the recall groups or annoyance at the potential of being labeled as CCP sympathizers.
Indifference to the outcome of the recall campaign was commonplace, with people cavalier about who governs, as long as they can live idly and peacefully. Overall, there appears to be a sense that the public has had enough of the DPP’s advocations.
Nevertheless, to the people who once condemned the 2014 Sunflower movement for supposedly creating social unrest and destabilizing investments — stock portfolios have grown from 3,000 points to 24,000 points.
Are people only now able to feel the slightest gratitude for those brave students? Or will people continue to profit from their courage, while pretending they never needed it?
Chen You-an is a retired financial professional.
Translated by Lenna Veronica Suminski
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has its chairperson election tomorrow. Although the party has long positioned itself as “China friendly,” the election is overshadowed by “an overwhelming wave of Chinese intervention.” The six candidates vying for the chair are former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), former lawmaker Cheng Li-wen (鄭麗文), Legislator Luo Chih-chiang (羅智強), Sun Yat-sen School president Chang Ya-chung (張亞中), former National Assembly representative Tsai Chih-hong (蔡志弘) and former Changhua County comissioner Zhuo Bo-yuan (卓伯源). While Cheng and Hau are front-runners in different surveys, Hau has complained of an online defamation campaign against him coming from accounts with foreign IP addresses,
Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmaker Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) on Saturday won the party’s chairperson election with 65,122 votes, or 50.15 percent of the votes, becoming the second woman in the seat and the first to have switched allegiance from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to the KMT. Cheng, running for the top KMT position for the first time, had been termed a “dark horse,” while the biggest contender was former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), considered by many to represent the party’s establishment elite. Hau also has substantial experience in government and in the KMT. Cheng joined the Wild Lily Student
When Taiwan High Speed Rail Corp (THSRC) announced the implementation of a new “quiet carriage” policy across all train cars on Sept. 22, I — a classroom teacher who frequently takes the high-speed rail — was filled with anticipation. The days of passengers videoconferencing as if there were no one else on the train, playing videos at full volume or speaking loudly without regard for others finally seemed numbered. However, this battle for silence was lost after less than one month. Faced with emotional guilt from infants and anxious parents, THSRC caved and retreated. However, official high-speed rail data have long
Starting next year, drivers older than 70 may be entitled to a monthly NT$1,500 public transportation and taxi subsidy if they relinquish their driver’s license, the Ministry of Transportation and Communications announced on Tuesday. The measure is part of a broader effort to improve road safety, with eligible participants receiving the subsidy for two years. The announcement comes amid mounting concern over traffic safety in Taiwan. A 2022 article by CNN quoted the name of a Facebook group devoted to the traffic situation called “Taiwan is a living hell for pedestrians,” while Berlin-based bne IntelliNews last month called it a “deadly