From an upgraded, nuclear-armed missile with near-global reach, to air defense lasers, hypersonic weapons and sea drones that could crowd its near seas, China sent a broad message of deterrence with its largest-ever military parade on Wednesday.
Military analysts and diplomats said Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) was serving multiple constituencies as he oversaw the parade — the US and its allies, China’s neighbors, plus regional powers India and Russia, and countries potentially eyeing purchases of Chinese technology.
“For all the operational questions that surround some of these new elements, China was sending a message of technological advance and military strength on all fronts — there is indeed a lot for rival defense planners to get their heads around,” security analyst Alexander Neill said.
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies China program assistant professor James Char (夏爾) said that the comprehensive range of new weapons on show highlighted how the Chinese military was determined to be able to control its near seas in any potential conflict with the US.
“The combination of the [sea] ... drones that they have and also the missiles, it will create an area with that external navies couldn’t even enter to intervene in the event of a contingency,” Char said.
Specifically, the new torpedo-shaped drones and array of hypersonic weapons that could be fired from land, sea and air would be a serious threat for the US and its partners — particularly when combined with its growing number of DF-26 medium-range ballistic missiles that could target ships and bases such as Guam.
Beyond the neat demonstration of precision and discipline on display at the parade, question marks remained about the full capabilities of the new weapons, Char said.
Analysts have long said that China would have to effectively secure control of the South and East China seas in any conflict over Taiwan to ensure success — no easy task, given the traditional naval dominance of the US across East Asia.
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase
RSS