Nuclear power, long derided as too expensive and too dangerous, is having a bit of a comeback, thanks in part to a new generation of influencers who have embraced the atom (seemingly, without question). A recent New York Times profile of influencer Isabelle Boemeke — who likes to pose with uranium pellets and other atomic swag — neatly captured the US’ newfound enthusiasm for nuclear power.
Ah, youth. If an earlier generation of enthusiasts were still alive, they would almost certainly retort: “Hold my beer.” That is because the original atomic culture they created puts to shame anything that the current crop of pro-nuclear pundits could ever produce — and a quick tour of that past suggests this latest revival is just as unlikely to pan out.
Although the comics and pulp fiction of the 1930s contained plenty of references to the “potential” of nuclear power, the 1945 bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki mark the formal dawn of what became known as the “atomic age.” Despite this rather inauspicious beginning, a growing number of people hoped that this destructive power might be channeled toward more peaceful ends.
Illustration: Yusha
Case in point: the cartoonist behind Blondie and Dagwood lent his artistic talents to the comic book Dagwood Splits the Atom, published in 1949. General Leslie Groves — the real-life military man who oversaw the Manhattan Project — helped craft the book, which envisioned an era of plentiful, cheap energy. Groves once said: “No effort is too great for us to make in imparting the facts about atomic energy to the greatest number of people.”
Facts, though, can often be boring. It was far better to focus on the more sensationalistic, fantastical nature of nuclear power. Which is why the 1940s and 1950s witnessed a remarkable focus on comic-book superheroes loosely inspired by the promise of nuclear power. Their ranks included the Atomic Thunderbolt, Atomic Man and Atoman, whose body, rapt readers learned, “generates atomic power.”
Atoman was fond of idealistic pronouncements. At the close of one issue, he declared: “Atomic power cannot belong to one man … group of men … or even one nation! It belongs to the whole world! My own power must be used to help all people … regardless of race or creed or nationality.”
However, such progressive declarations — made as the nation drifted toward McCarthyism — did not resonate. Instead, Atoman was quickly eclipsed by an improbable comic book duo who did not have a political agenda: Atomic Mouse and Atomic Rabbit. Both had been ordinary beings, minding their own business, but swallowing some U-235 pills (the mouse) and eating radioactive carrots (the rabbit) had turned them into superheroes. (Exposure to radiation would become the most common origin story for future superheroes, including the Hulk and Spiderman.)
Comics were but the beginning. The American obsession with the atom — and its promise of limitless, cheap power — generated a torrent of pop culture that could fairly be described as atomic kitsch. None of it made much of a distinction between the peaceful and military uses of nuclear energy — and Americans ate it up.
Designers embraced the aesthetic, turning out consumer goods that riffed on atomic structures. There was the “Atomic Starburst,” which adorned a range of cups, saucers and bowls manufactured by Franciscan Ceramics. Or George Nelson’s Ball Clock, which became an icon of Midcentury modern design.
Hollywood did its part, turning out a series of forgettable films about uranium mining. There was The Atomic Kid, Uranium Boom, Dig That Uranium and many more. Most featured forgettable plots, buxom blondes and promotional posters with cringeworthy tag lines. “How their Geiger counters click they meet those babes from the Badlands,” was the one for Dig That Uranium.
There was family-friendly fare, too. These included Uranium Rush, billed as “an exciting new electric game for the family,” along with science kits for kids, such as the Gilbert Atomic Energy Lab, which came with its own collection of radioactive ores and a working Geiger counter. Toymaker Revell sold a scale model of the Westinghouse Atomic Power Plant, the nation’s first commercial reactor, when it opened in 1957.
Atoms hit the airwaves, too. Little Caesar & the Red Callender Sextette released Atomic Love in 1953 — just one of many such songs from that decade. In Atomic Baby, Amos Milburn crooned about a woman or a nuclear reactor — it was not quite clear which:
“Yeah, she heats my room, she lights my light. She starts my motor and it runs all night. He’s my atomic baby, yeah, she’s my atomic baby. She’s my atomic baby and I have to handle her with care.”
By the early 1960s, though, the country’s fascination abruptly ended with the Cuban Missile Crisis, which brought the world to the brink of nuclear war and undercut the appeal of atomic novelties. So, too, would harrowing episodes such as Three Mile Island and Chernobyl — to say nothing of fictional depictions of nuclear war like the movie The Day After, released in 1983.
Still, as the late Burt Reynolds once quipped: “If you hang on to things long enough, they get back into style.” Eight decades after the dawn of the atomic age, the enthusiasm that Boemeke and others have for nuclear power feels oddly familiar — tamer, perhaps, but no less naive than the postwar dreams that once gripped the American imagination. After all, what seems cool and even cute today is likely to elicit as much fear as fascination tomorrow.
Stephen Mihm, a professor of history at the University of Georgia, is coauthor of Crisis Economics: A Crash Course in the Future of Finance. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Taiwan’s business-friendly environment and science parks designed to foster technology industries are the key elements of the nation’s winning chip formula, inspiring the US and other countries to try to replicate it. Representatives from US business groups — such as the Greater Phoenix Economic Council, and the Arizona-Taiwan Trade and Investment Office — in July visited the Hsinchu Science Park (新竹科學園區), home to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) headquarters and its first fab. They showed great interest in creating similar science parks, with aims to build an extensive semiconductor chain suitable for the US, with chip designing, packaging and manufacturing. The
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has its chairperson election tomorrow. Although the party has long positioned itself as “China friendly,” the election is overshadowed by “an overwhelming wave of Chinese intervention.” The six candidates vying for the chair are former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), former lawmaker Cheng Li-wen (鄭麗文), Legislator Luo Chih-chiang (羅智強), Sun Yat-sen School president Chang Ya-chung (張亞中), former National Assembly representative Tsai Chih-hong (蔡志弘) and former Changhua County comissioner Zhuo Bo-yuan (卓伯源). While Cheng and Hau are front-runners in different surveys, Hau has complained of an online defamation campaign against him coming from accounts with foreign IP addresses,
When Taiwan High Speed Rail Corp (THSRC) announced the implementation of a new “quiet carriage” policy across all train cars on Sept. 22, I — a classroom teacher who frequently takes the high-speed rail — was filled with anticipation. The days of passengers videoconferencing as if there were no one else on the train, playing videos at full volume or speaking loudly without regard for others finally seemed numbered. However, this battle for silence was lost after less than one month. Faced with emotional guilt from infants and anxious parents, THSRC caved and retreated. However, official high-speed rail data have long