The latest Cabinet reshuffle shows that President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration wants to promote consistent and coherent policies, while reassuring the business community and local industries. It also aims to restore public confidence as Taiwan’s economy faces rising challenges from the US government’s new tariffs and the explosive growth in artificial intelligence (AI).
The new lineup includes former Executive Yuan secretary-general Kung Ming-hsin (龔明鑫) as minister of economic affairs and former Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research president Yeh Chun-hsien (葉俊顯) as head of the National Development Council. Other top finance and statistics officials — such as Minister of Finance Chuang Tsui-yun (莊翠雲), Financial Supervisory Commission Chairman Peng Jin-lung (彭金隆) and Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) Minister Chen Shu-tzu (陳淑姿) — have been retained.
Kung served as the minister of the National Development Council and the deputy minister of economic affairs before taking the Executive Yuan post last year. He helped shape initiatives such as the “5+2 Innovative Industries Plan” and the “Asia Silicon Valley” project under former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文). Yeh is an Academia Sinica researcher and a member of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party’s New Frontier Foundation think tank. He has long assisted the government in policy planning and helped assess its relief policies during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The changes come as Taiwan’s economy is exhibiting a contradictory phenomenon. On one hand, GDP grew 8.01 percent year-on-year in the second quarter, accelerating from the first quarter’s 5.45 percent growth. The DGBAS revised up its full-year GDP growth forecast to 4.45 percent, from a forecast of 3.1 percent issued in May, suggesting strong growth momentum. On the other hand, retail sales in July fell 3.6 percent year-on-year, the fourth consecutive month of decline, while consumer confidence last month weakened to the lowest level in two-and-a-half years. A six-month outlook gauge for the manufacturing sector showed poor visibility for the second half of the year, indicating divergent economic signals.
The second-quarter GDP performance reflected the nation’s robust exports driven by global demand for AI and other emerging technologies. Nevertheless, the breadth of exports has contracted, with traditional industries — such as machine tools, plastics and rubber products, textiles and transportation equipment — battered by tariff uncertainty, slowing global demand and the New Taiwan dollar’s appreciation. That highlights an important issue: Most local industries have not grown simultaneously to support the economy in registering a balanced expansion.
An essential task for the new Cabinet members would be to assist small and medium-sized firms and non-tech industries to overcome tariff-related difficulties and improve their global competitiveness as the economy undergoes a structural transformation. Other objectives are just as important, such as helping keep Taiwan Power Co afloat, ensuring a sufficient supply of electricity for emerging AI applications, dealing with challenges that hinder the smooth transition to green energy, boosting industrial innovations to establish a firmer foundation for future development and maintaining a steady pace toward net zero carbon emissions. All of these issues have to be addressed with pragmatic, effective measures.
However, one daunting task facing the new Cabinet is maintaining strong investment momentum in Taiwan, as Taiwanese businesses are increasingly investing overseas to deal with global supply chain restructuring and the dramatic changes brought about by US President Donald Trump’s trade policies. Meanwhile, close collaboration between new and experienced ministers, as well as a healthy relationship between the ruling and opposition parties, is certain to prove essential.
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic