The latest Cabinet reshuffle shows that President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration wants to promote consistent and coherent policies, while reassuring the business community and local industries. It also aims to restore public confidence as Taiwan’s economy faces rising challenges from the US government’s new tariffs and the explosive growth in artificial intelligence (AI).
The new lineup includes former Executive Yuan secretary-general Kung Ming-hsin (龔明鑫) as minister of economic affairs and former Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research president Yeh Chun-hsien (葉俊顯) as head of the National Development Council. Other top finance and statistics officials — such as Minister of Finance Chuang Tsui-yun (莊翠雲), Financial Supervisory Commission Chairman Peng Jin-lung (彭金隆) and Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) Minister Chen Shu-tzu (陳淑姿) — have been retained.
Kung served as the minister of the National Development Council and the deputy minister of economic affairs before taking the Executive Yuan post last year. He helped shape initiatives such as the “5+2 Innovative Industries Plan” and the “Asia Silicon Valley” project under former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文). Yeh is an Academia Sinica researcher and a member of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party’s New Frontier Foundation think tank. He has long assisted the government in policy planning and helped assess its relief policies during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The changes come as Taiwan’s economy is exhibiting a contradictory phenomenon. On one hand, GDP grew 8.01 percent year-on-year in the second quarter, accelerating from the first quarter’s 5.45 percent growth. The DGBAS revised up its full-year GDP growth forecast to 4.45 percent, from a forecast of 3.1 percent issued in May, suggesting strong growth momentum. On the other hand, retail sales in July fell 3.6 percent year-on-year, the fourth consecutive month of decline, while consumer confidence last month weakened to the lowest level in two-and-a-half years. A six-month outlook gauge for the manufacturing sector showed poor visibility for the second half of the year, indicating divergent economic signals.
The second-quarter GDP performance reflected the nation’s robust exports driven by global demand for AI and other emerging technologies. Nevertheless, the breadth of exports has contracted, with traditional industries — such as machine tools, plastics and rubber products, textiles and transportation equipment — battered by tariff uncertainty, slowing global demand and the New Taiwan dollar’s appreciation. That highlights an important issue: Most local industries have not grown simultaneously to support the economy in registering a balanced expansion.
An essential task for the new Cabinet members would be to assist small and medium-sized firms and non-tech industries to overcome tariff-related difficulties and improve their global competitiveness as the economy undergoes a structural transformation. Other objectives are just as important, such as helping keep Taiwan Power Co afloat, ensuring a sufficient supply of electricity for emerging AI applications, dealing with challenges that hinder the smooth transition to green energy, boosting industrial innovations to establish a firmer foundation for future development and maintaining a steady pace toward net zero carbon emissions. All of these issues have to be addressed with pragmatic, effective measures.
However, one daunting task facing the new Cabinet is maintaining strong investment momentum in Taiwan, as Taiwanese businesses are increasingly investing overseas to deal with global supply chain restructuring and the dramatic changes brought about by US President Donald Trump’s trade policies. Meanwhile, close collaboration between new and experienced ministers, as well as a healthy relationship between the ruling and opposition parties, is certain to prove essential.
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS