Following the second failed recall elections on Aug. 23 against seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators and the nuclear power referendum, 19 Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) local councilors called on President William Lai (賴清德) to win back public support.
The appeal came as a recent My Formosa poll showed that the KMT’s favorability rose to 36 percent, surpassing the DPP’s 33 percent. Most of the councilors are in their 30s, representing a younger generation of leaders who are concerned about the party’s direction.
Keelung City Councilor Jiho Chang (張之豪) said that he hoped their five proposals help secure Taiwan’s long-term safety, sovereignty and economic prosperity.
The first proposal urged Lai to seek bipartisan cooperation on Constitutional Court appointments, even if he has to compromise. They said that an independent and credible court is essential to safeguard sovereignty should political power shift, ensuring that acts undermining democracy or statehood could be overturned.
The second focuses on economic security, which the councilors said is central to regaining the confidence of younger and swing voters. With China’s intensifying military pressure, economic coercion and disinformation campaigns, public perception is critical. The public needs to feel that their voices are not taken for granted, they said.
Housing affordability also loomed large. Chang said that many of his supporters view their inability to buy a home as their greatest bereavement.
He suggested expanding public housing and encouraging real-estate development in less populated areas east of Taipei. For example, Keelung to Xinyi District (信義) only takes 20 minutes by car or bus when traffic is light. Other New Taipei City districts, such as Jinshan (金山) and Wanli (萬里), could also be included in housing projects.
Such development should be paired with expanded public transportation. Bold, visible measures that tangibly improve livelihoods are crucial. Policies that deliver broad benefits would also leave the opposition with less incentive to oppose them in the legislature.
The most persistent issue is income. When the KMT proposes cash handouts, the DPP should avoid dismissing them outright as unconstitutional. Instead, it could respond with more tailored subsidies or programs based on urgent public needs, perhaps using progressive, adjustable amounts tied to income. A successful precedent was former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) TPASS program, which proved widely popular by offering unlimited rides across Taipei for just NT$1,200 per month.
The third and fifth proposals — on green energy and party reform — called for Lai and the DPP to act with greater agility, responsiveness and decisiveness. The councilors said that if nuclear power could be incorporated safely into a hybrid energy strategy, the administration should take the option seriously.
In last week’s referendum, the public voted in favor of nuclear energy — although the measure failed to clear the threshold. The councilors also called for stronger, clearer messaging to accompany future policy initiatives, along with fresh, more diverse leadership in the party and the Cabinet.
Whether these younger voices would be heeded remains to be seen. The DPP has traditionally resolved internal differences through dialogue and unity ahead of elections. The question is whether that spirit of cohesion would hold true in the lead-up to next year’s polls and in 2028.
Rath Wang is a senior policy fellow at consulting firm Safe Spaces. He is a producer and host of political talk shows and podcasts, and has worked on political campaigns and advocacies in Taiwan and the US. He can be reached at rathwang@safespacesllc.com.
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Shen You-chung (沈有忠) on Thursday last week urged democratic nations to boycott China’s military parade on Wednesday next week. The parade, a grand display of Beijing’s military hardware, is meant to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II. While China has invited world leaders to attend, many have declined. A Kyodo News report on Sunday said that Japan has asked European and Asian leaders who have yet to respond to the invitation to refrain from attending. Tokyo is seeking to prevent Beijing from spreading its distorted interpretation of wartime history, the report
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase
RSS