The moment rivers traverse borders, their courses affect terrains and political responses. Sitting atop the glistening snowy Tibetan Plateau is the Angsi Glacier, the source of the Brahmaputra. The river meanders from China down to India’s Arunachal Pradesh and subsequently flows into the Ganges Delta in Bangladesh.
The Brahmaputra brings life to more than 100 million people living downstream, but also underlying tensions between countries. As China sought to construct the world’s largest hydropower dam in Tibet, India became concerned about reduced water flows, which could jeopardize its national security, regional dominance and people’s livelihoods.
For farmers and city dwellers, access to billions of cubic meters of water during the dry season is a matter of life and death. India’s government has promptly responded by announcing a dam-building project in Arunachal Pradesh, hoping to reduce water shortages around Guwahati, the largest city in Assam state, during the non-rainy season.
Its approach shows that when an upstream country controls water flows, the sovereignties and livelihoods of downstream countries could be weaponized and threatened. Dams are not just water facilities; they are bargaining chips countries can wager during international negotiations.
That said, residents of Arunachal Pradesh have long resisted the dam project. They worry their villages would be flooded and their traditional way of life would be destroyed; such fears from local communities stand in direct conflict with the government’s strategic demands.
While India’s dam project aims to mitigate the impact of droughts during dry seasons, the social costs and ecological risks it incurs are difficult to overlook. It is emblematic of contemporary challenges, where concerns of national security, local life, technological capabilities, natural constraints, political ambitions and ethical responsibilities intertwine, and are difficult to be addressed in isolation of each other.
China claimed its hydropower dam had undergone strict scientific evaluation, and it vowed to act responsibly on using water from transboundary rivers. However, from India’s perspective, China’s control poses a risk and a threat, and it could only respond by accelerating construction of the dam, thereby prompting a defensive move.
China and India’s race for water resources mirrors the state of geopolitics: Those on the top make decisions, and those below them are forced to adjust their tactics and their way of life. India has attempted to grasp such uncertainty by calculating water flows during dry seasons, protecting cities down river and preventing floods.
Rivers shape landscapes, power hierarchies and the mentalities of a society. For India, dams symbolize sovereign control of life-saving resources; they are also a reflection of its security concerns near the border. The Upper Siang Multipurpose Storage Dam must be completed, even if it creates building and social costs.
The events surrounding the Brahmaputra are more than a race to construct dams; they also test how countries assert sovereign control, handle border issues and safeguard the survival of their citizens. The prospective dam at Upper Siang shows that India has chosen to defend its water resources and respond to changes in international water politics.
Liu Che-ting is a writer.
Translated by Cayce Pan
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
RSS