Being only human, people often have a habit of taking credit for positive outcomes, while blaming their environment — especially the government — for negative ones. Therefore, in democratic countries, it is not abnormal for a party that has been in power for a long time to experience a decline in support, even to the point of losing office. Even a giant such as Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party is no exception — nor is Taiwan.
If New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and then-Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — their parties’ respective candidates — had joined forces on a joint ticket during last year’s presidential election, it is highly likely they could have taken the Executive Yuan.
Some have said that President William Lai’s (賴清德) low vote share in that election was proof that former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) policies had failed, but the truth is that it was precisely because of Tsai’s highly recognized record of achievements — plus the three-candidate race — that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) broke Taiwan’s pattern of the Executive Yuan alternating between the major parties every eight years.
In 2018, there was a saying that Taiwan’s largest political party is the one that “hates the DPP.” Today, despite that the DPP’s overall performance has still been objectively better than that of the KMT and TPP, the saying seems to have become reality.
Under such circumstances, it seems that a change in the ruling party in 2028 is almost inevitable, but remember that while the DPP might lose, Taiwan must not. Voters can change who is in power, but must not replace them with pro-China politicians.
The DPP should seek those it can cooperate with outside the party — whether individuals or political groups — and give them opportunities to shine and earn credibility through Cabinet reshuffles or local elections.
That would also demonstrate that the DPP does not have ambitions to monopolize power. In 2028, the DPP should present an image of selfless cooperation and a locally rooted coalition to defeat pro-China politicians. However, the DPP must choose partners that possess the integrity of figures such as former vice president Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁) to avoid producing another Ko.
Chen Jun-kuang is a physician.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic