Being only human, people often have a habit of taking credit for positive outcomes, while blaming their environment — especially the government — for negative ones. Therefore, in democratic countries, it is not abnormal for a party that has been in power for a long time to experience a decline in support, even to the point of losing office. Even a giant such as Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party is no exception — nor is Taiwan.
If New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and then-Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — their parties’ respective candidates — had joined forces on a joint ticket during last year’s presidential election, it is highly likely they could have taken the Executive Yuan.
Some have said that President William Lai’s (賴清德) low vote share in that election was proof that former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) policies had failed, but the truth is that it was precisely because of Tsai’s highly recognized record of achievements — plus the three-candidate race — that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) broke Taiwan’s pattern of the Executive Yuan alternating between the major parties every eight years.
In 2018, there was a saying that Taiwan’s largest political party is the one that “hates the DPP.” Today, despite that the DPP’s overall performance has still been objectively better than that of the KMT and TPP, the saying seems to have become reality.
Under such circumstances, it seems that a change in the ruling party in 2028 is almost inevitable, but remember that while the DPP might lose, Taiwan must not. Voters can change who is in power, but must not replace them with pro-China politicians.
The DPP should seek those it can cooperate with outside the party — whether individuals or political groups — and give them opportunities to shine and earn credibility through Cabinet reshuffles or local elections.
That would also demonstrate that the DPP does not have ambitions to monopolize power. In 2028, the DPP should present an image of selfless cooperation and a locally rooted coalition to defeat pro-China politicians. However, the DPP must choose partners that possess the integrity of figures such as former vice president Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁) to avoid producing another Ko.
Chen Jun-kuang is a physician.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS