For many, the hardest part of Saturday’s recall elections and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung was not the outcome itself, but the perception gap and sense of helplessness when the majority seemed to endorse views different from their own.
Supporters of extending the plant’s service life focused on energy security, economic growth and a stable power supply. Opponents pointed to the dangers of nuclear waste and earthquakes, while stressing the importance of environmental sustainability.
Both sides marshaled experts and data, yet neither could persuade the other. That revealed a harsh truth: Public policy is never determined by science alone, but is also shaped by values, sentiment, fears, identity and the competing interests of many stakeholders. Once opinions harden, they seldom change, regardless of the evidence.
The recall votes showed a similar dynamic. Many felt the social atmosphere shift once the results were announced. Those who had openly taken a stand and devoted themselves to advocacy were left frustrated, disappointed, even ashamed and isolated. Believing they had acted rationally, they nevertheless found themselves beset by self-doubt when confronted with reality, and some began to question their ability to engage in dialogue with the wider public.
However, a majority vote does not necessarily equate to the right outcome. Collective decisionmaking involves many factors beyond rational judgment. Scientific evidence does not lose its value simply because it is disregarded in the moment. What is dismissed today — data, risk assessments, reasoned arguments — might be re-examined tomorrow.
Social consensus evolves. Being in the minority today does not mean a turning point will never come.
In light of this, those disappointed by the results should consider shifting their role from debaters to witnesses. By preserving evidence and keeping careful records, they ensure that today’s choices can be judged anew in the future.
They should also seek out like-minded allies to avoid isolation in moments of frustration, and should not withdraw from engaging with public issues. By fostering ongoing dialogue and advancing rational, science-based perspectives, society can gradually narrow the perception gap and build a more mature consensus.
Lu Chun-wei is a dermatologist and an assistant professor at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.
Translated by Fion Khan
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
RSS