For many, the hardest part of Saturday’s recall elections and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung was not the outcome itself, but the perception gap and sense of helplessness when the majority seemed to endorse views different from their own.
Supporters of extending the plant’s service life focused on energy security, economic growth and a stable power supply. Opponents pointed to the dangers of nuclear waste and earthquakes, while stressing the importance of environmental sustainability.
Both sides marshaled experts and data, yet neither could persuade the other. That revealed a harsh truth: Public policy is never determined by science alone, but is also shaped by values, sentiment, fears, identity and the competing interests of many stakeholders. Once opinions harden, they seldom change, regardless of the evidence.
The recall votes showed a similar dynamic. Many felt the social atmosphere shift once the results were announced. Those who had openly taken a stand and devoted themselves to advocacy were left frustrated, disappointed, even ashamed and isolated. Believing they had acted rationally, they nevertheless found themselves beset by self-doubt when confronted with reality, and some began to question their ability to engage in dialogue with the wider public.
However, a majority vote does not necessarily equate to the right outcome. Collective decisionmaking involves many factors beyond rational judgment. Scientific evidence does not lose its value simply because it is disregarded in the moment. What is dismissed today — data, risk assessments, reasoned arguments — might be re-examined tomorrow.
Social consensus evolves. Being in the minority today does not mean a turning point will never come.
In light of this, those disappointed by the results should consider shifting their role from debaters to witnesses. By preserving evidence and keeping careful records, they ensure that today’s choices can be judged anew in the future.
They should also seek out like-minded allies to avoid isolation in moments of frustration, and should not withdraw from engaging with public issues. By fostering ongoing dialogue and advancing rational, science-based perspectives, society can gradually narrow the perception gap and build a more mature consensus.
Lu Chun-wei is a dermatologist and an assistant professor at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.
Translated by Fion Khan
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Most countries are commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II with condemnations of militarism and imperialism, and commemoration of the global catastrophe wrought by the war. On the other hand, China is to hold a military parade. According to China’s state-run Xinhua news agency, Beijing is conducting the military parade in Tiananmen Square on Sept. 3 to “mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II and the victory of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression.” However, during World War II, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) had not yet been established. It
A recent critique of former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s speech in Taiwan (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” by Sasha B. Chhabra, Aug. 12, page 8) seriously misinterpreted his remarks, twisting them to fit a preconceived narrative. As a Taiwanese who witnessed his political rise and fall firsthand while living in the UK and was present for his speech in Taipei, I have a unique vantage point from which to say I think the critiques of his visit deliberately misinterpreted his words. By dwelling on his personal controversies, they obscured the real substance of his message. A clarification is needed to
There is an old saying that if there is blood in the water, the sharks will come. In Taiwan’s case, that shark is China, circling, waiting for any sign of weakness to strike. Many thought the failed recall effort was that blood in the water, a signal for Beijing to press harder, but Taiwan’s democracy has just proven that China is mistaken. The recent recall campaign against 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, many with openly pro-Beijing leanings, failed at the ballot box. While the challenge targeted opposition lawmakers rather than President William Lai (賴清德) himself, it became an indirect
RSS