A crippling strike by Air Canada flight attendants that grounded thousands of flights over wages and unpaid labor is the latest blow to the airline industry’s compensation system, which does not fully pay cabin crews for their hours at work.
The union, representing more than 10,000 Air Canada flight attendants, on Tuesday said they reached a tentative deal that ends unpaid work, without sharing further details. Analysts say any gains could influence upcoming contract negotiations in North America.
The deal could also drive up structural costs in a cyclical industry. Labor is airlines’ biggest operating expense after fuel.
The four-day strike that stranded more than 500,000 passengers mirrors unrest at US carriers, where flight attendants cannot walk off the job until the National Mediation Board grants permission.
However, cabin crews at American, Southwest and Alaska Airlines last year rejected several contract deals, saying they did not address concerns about unpaid work. Flight attendants at United Airlines last month voted down a US$6 billion tentative labor agreement, which did not provide compensation for time on the ground before and after flights.
The Chicago-based airline’s union is surveying its members before returning to bargaining in December. United and the union did not immediately respond to requests for comments.
While cabin crews get paid for a minimum number of hours, they are mostly compensated when planes are in motion, neglecting the crucial tasks performed during boarding, deplaning and other ground operations.
Unions say this amounts to significant unpaid labor. In previous contract negotiations, airlines secured concessions from workers as the industry was struggling due to economic downturns or the COVID-19 pandemic.
However, a runup in inflation, stagnant wages and increased workload have fueled resentment among flight attendants, bolstering demands for a change in pay practices.
“The Air Canada strike helps negotiations everywhere. It defined the problem of ridiculous expectations for flight attendants to work without pay,” said Sara Nelson, international president of the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA, which represents 55,000 flight attendants at 20 airlines, including United. “The striking flight attendants are an inspiration to working people everywhere.”
Nelson spoke with Wesley Lesosky, president of Air Canada’s flight attendants union, on Monday to coordinate positions, representatives of both unions said.
Shanyn Elliott, an Air Canada Rouge flight attendant, said when she started work in 2017, she would pick up long-haul flights to earn extra pay as her C$23 (US$16.53) hourly wage did not cover the cost of living.
Adding to her frustration, frequent flight delays after the COVID-19 pandemic meant longer hours, said Elliott, who heads the strike committee for Air Canada flight attendants at the Canadian Union of Public Employees.
Air Canada chief executive officer Michael Rousseau said the industry needed to review its compensation models. In an interview, he said the Canadian carrier has accepted the concept of ground pay, adding that other airlines would likely look at their own models.
“I do think the industry has to take a closer look at this over time,” Rousseau said. “We all should be open to change.”
American and Alaska have already begun compensating attendants for boarding time in their new labor agreements. American’s flight attendants are now also compensated for some hours between flights.
Those gains came after Delta Air Lines, whose flight attendants are not in a union, instituted boarding pay for cabin crew at half of their hourly wages in 2022 when they were trying to organize.
However, paying for boarding and time on the ground would inflate airlines’ operating costs.
American Airlines’ new flight attendant contract is estimated to cost it an extra US$4.2 billion over five years. The company last month blamed increased labor costs in part for its margin underperformance.
Canaccord Genuity analyst Matthew Lee estimated that the proposed wage hikes at Air Canada would mean up to C$140 million in incremental costs. Air Canada’s wage bill has increased about 26 percent since before the COVID-19 pandemic.
The airline is already grappling with weak passenger traffic to the US amid strained trade relations between Canada and the US, leading to a nearly 40 percent year-on-year decline in quarterly profit.
However, analysts have said that holding the line on costs risks industrial peace.
“The movement is on,” said John Gradek, a faculty lecturer in supply networks and aviation management at McGill University.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS