China’s military has long been accused of reckless behavior in the air and at sea. Last week’s collision between two of its vessels in the South China Sea underscores how a single miscalculation could spark a wider conflict.
At stake is the stability of the Indo-Pacific, a strategically important region for the US, where several of its partners, including Japan, the Philippines and Australia, are increasingly exposed to Beijing’s risky maneuvers.
The latest incident is part of a broader pattern of behavior, especially in the areas China says it owns. Video of the dangerous encounter on Monday last week shows a China Coast Guard ship firing water cannons as it chased a Philippine Coast Guard vessel, before slamming into one of its own warships. Despite the evidence, Beijing blamed Manila for the accident, accusing it of deliberately “intruding” into its waters.
Illustration: Mountain People
China’s strategy of pushing boundaries is also about testing US resolve. The US and the Philippines are treaty allies, with Washington legally obligated to defend Manila if attacked. By escalating encounters at sea just to the brink of confrontation, Beijing is probing whether Washington would stand by that commitment.
China’s repeated harassment of Philippine vessels comes despite a 2016 arbitration ruling in The Hague that sided with the Philippines, declaring Beijing’s historical assertions baseless. China claims more than 80 percent of the lucrative waters and refuses to acknowledge the competing stakes of other Southeast Asian nations.
This assertiveness is not limited to the sea. Beijing regularly deploys warplanes toward Taiwan. One of the most recent high-profile incursions took place in June after US lawmakers visited a top Taiwanese military figure. The tactic appears to have two goals in mind: Exhaust Taipei’s pilots, but also to normalize China’s military presence.
It is also about checking how far Washington would go to defend Taiwan in a crisis. Under US President Donald Trump, there has been little guarantee the US would step in if it were attacked.
Key allies Japan and Australia have felt heightened pressure, too. Last month, Tokyo expressed serious concerns after a Chinese fighter bomber flew within 30m of one of its surveillance planes over the East China Sea. Beijing defended those actions as “justified” and “professional.”
In February, Australia was forced to issue aviation warnings when Chinese naval vessels staged live-fire exercises off its coast, followed by similar drills near New Zealand the next day.
Individually, Beijing can dismiss these incidents as isolated, and insist that it is doing nothing wrong. Combined, they reveal a broader pattern — a calculated strategy to assert dominance while stopping short of outright war, as the RAND Corp, a California-based think tank said in a report last year.
China views these actions as a continuation of politics rather than warfare, deliberately keeping them below the threshold of open conflict, the report added. This allows Beijing to secure economic resources in disputed territories, while limiting the ability of other countries to do the same.
Some recent moves from Washington have been reassuring. On Wednesday last week, the US deployed two warships to Scarborough Shoal (Huangyan Island, 黃岩島), the site of the collision, in an apparent show of support.
Beijing said it had expelled one of the US ships that entered its territorial waters, while Washington defended the operation as legal under international law.
Such freedom-of-navigation operations must continue in the face of China’s expanding claims, even at the risk of further angering Beijing. Equally important is consistently raising awareness about its destabilizing actions, challenging the narrative of ownership.
These incidents cannot be shrugged off as routine. Left unchecked, the dangers of a miscalculation would only grow in China’s high-seas game of chicken. One wrong move could ignite a much wider crisis.
Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC’s lead Asia presenter, and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the
RSS