China’s military has long been accused of reckless behavior in the air and at sea. Last week’s collision between two of its vessels in the South China Sea underscores how a single miscalculation could spark a wider conflict.
At stake is the stability of the Indo-Pacific, a strategically important region for the US, where several of its partners, including Japan, the Philippines and Australia, are increasingly exposed to Beijing’s risky maneuvers.
The latest incident is part of a broader pattern of behavior, especially in the areas China says it owns. Video of the dangerous encounter on Monday last week shows a China Coast Guard ship firing water cannons as it chased a Philippine Coast Guard vessel, before slamming into one of its own warships. Despite the evidence, Beijing blamed Manila for the accident, accusing it of deliberately “intruding” into its waters.
Illustration: Mountain People
China’s strategy of pushing boundaries is also about testing US resolve. The US and the Philippines are treaty allies, with Washington legally obligated to defend Manila if attacked. By escalating encounters at sea just to the brink of confrontation, Beijing is probing whether Washington would stand by that commitment.
China’s repeated harassment of Philippine vessels comes despite a 2016 arbitration ruling in The Hague that sided with the Philippines, declaring Beijing’s historical assertions baseless. China claims more than 80 percent of the lucrative waters and refuses to acknowledge the competing stakes of other Southeast Asian nations.
This assertiveness is not limited to the sea. Beijing regularly deploys warplanes toward Taiwan. One of the most recent high-profile incursions took place in June after US lawmakers visited a top Taiwanese military figure. The tactic appears to have two goals in mind: Exhaust Taipei’s pilots, but also to normalize China’s military presence.
It is also about checking how far Washington would go to defend Taiwan in a crisis. Under US President Donald Trump, there has been little guarantee the US would step in if it were attacked.
Key allies Japan and Australia have felt heightened pressure, too. Last month, Tokyo expressed serious concerns after a Chinese fighter bomber flew within 30m of one of its surveillance planes over the East China Sea. Beijing defended those actions as “justified” and “professional.”
In February, Australia was forced to issue aviation warnings when Chinese naval vessels staged live-fire exercises off its coast, followed by similar drills near New Zealand the next day.
Individually, Beijing can dismiss these incidents as isolated, and insist that it is doing nothing wrong. Combined, they reveal a broader pattern — a calculated strategy to assert dominance while stopping short of outright war, as the RAND Corp, a California-based think tank said in a report last year.
China views these actions as a continuation of politics rather than warfare, deliberately keeping them below the threshold of open conflict, the report added. This allows Beijing to secure economic resources in disputed territories, while limiting the ability of other countries to do the same.
Some recent moves from Washington have been reassuring. On Wednesday last week, the US deployed two warships to Scarborough Shoal (Huangyan Island, 黃岩島), the site of the collision, in an apparent show of support.
Beijing said it had expelled one of the US ships that entered its territorial waters, while Washington defended the operation as legal under international law.
Such freedom-of-navigation operations must continue in the face of China’s expanding claims, even at the risk of further angering Beijing. Equally important is consistently raising awareness about its destabilizing actions, challenging the narrative of ownership.
These incidents cannot be shrugged off as routine. Left unchecked, the dangers of a miscalculation would only grow in China’s high-seas game of chicken. One wrong move could ignite a much wider crisis.
Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC’s lead Asia presenter, and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS