As a teacher at an elementary school, I understand deeply that in this era of information overload, teaching children how to distinguish between fact and fiction is more important than simply imparting knowledge from school textbooks. Tomorrow’s referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County is the perfect teaching material.
According to data from Taiwan Power Co’s Web site, even though there are currently no operating nuclear power plants in Taiwan, there is still a 15 percent reserve margin during peak power utilization and power supply remains in the “green,” meaning it is sufficient.
This is a clear indication that Taiwan’s energy supply does not rely on nuclear power, and yet, society is filled with claims that there would be power shortages without it. This is the world that our children must face — one filled with conflicting information, and a chaotic mix of truth and falsehood.
Examining another controversy, some claim that nuclear power is “clean and cheap,” but the reality is that high-level nuclear waste has a half-life that can span tens of thousands of years, and there is still no adequate solution for its disposal.
Furthermore, the use of nuclear power involves the enormous costs of decommissioning, maintenance and waste storage. However, this information has not been fully presented and is instead dumbed down into one convenient slogan.
I often remind my students: “When you see a sensational headline, do not just rush to believe it. When you come across data, you always need to question its source.”
Only through media literacy can students avoid a future where they are manipulated by misinformation.
The referendum further exposes a contradiction — the Jinshan Nuclear Power Plant and Guosheng Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City have been left out of the equation. Thus, only residents of southern Taiwan are being asked to bear the risks associated with restarting the Ma-anshan plant.
The votes would be cast by citizens nationwide, but the consequences of that vote would be borne by just one region. Is such a design not a test of human nature?
I want to appeal to my fellow educators across the nation — we are not just transmitters of knowledge, but also leaders in cultivating information literacy. When it comes to public issues such as energy, air pollution and climate change, the classroom should guide children to examine different perspectives and learn to think independently to prevent them from being misled by one-sided or selective narratives that purposefully ignore facts and undermine rational judgement.
On the surface, the referendum might appear to be about energy choices, but at its core, it is a test of democratic literacy. Society is caught up in a heated debate, and children are watching how adults are handling the dispute. Helping them to develop the ability to think independently is the most fundamental function of education in safeguarding our democracy.
Hsieh Chia-hao is a teacher at an elementary school in Hualien County.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS