As a teacher at an elementary school, I understand deeply that in this era of information overload, teaching children how to distinguish between fact and fiction is more important than simply imparting knowledge from school textbooks. Tomorrow’s referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County is the perfect teaching material.
According to data from Taiwan Power Co’s Web site, even though there are currently no operating nuclear power plants in Taiwan, there is still a 15 percent reserve margin during peak power utilization and power supply remains in the “green,” meaning it is sufficient.
This is a clear indication that Taiwan’s energy supply does not rely on nuclear power, and yet, society is filled with claims that there would be power shortages without it. This is the world that our children must face — one filled with conflicting information, and a chaotic mix of truth and falsehood.
Examining another controversy, some claim that nuclear power is “clean and cheap,” but the reality is that high-level nuclear waste has a half-life that can span tens of thousands of years, and there is still no adequate solution for its disposal.
Furthermore, the use of nuclear power involves the enormous costs of decommissioning, maintenance and waste storage. However, this information has not been fully presented and is instead dumbed down into one convenient slogan.
I often remind my students: “When you see a sensational headline, do not just rush to believe it. When you come across data, you always need to question its source.”
Only through media literacy can students avoid a future where they are manipulated by misinformation.
The referendum further exposes a contradiction — the Jinshan Nuclear Power Plant and Guosheng Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City have been left out of the equation. Thus, only residents of southern Taiwan are being asked to bear the risks associated with restarting the Ma-anshan plant.
The votes would be cast by citizens nationwide, but the consequences of that vote would be borne by just one region. Is such a design not a test of human nature?
I want to appeal to my fellow educators across the nation — we are not just transmitters of knowledge, but also leaders in cultivating information literacy. When it comes to public issues such as energy, air pollution and climate change, the classroom should guide children to examine different perspectives and learn to think independently to prevent them from being misled by one-sided or selective narratives that purposefully ignore facts and undermine rational judgement.
On the surface, the referendum might appear to be about energy choices, but at its core, it is a test of democratic literacy. Society is caught up in a heated debate, and children are watching how adults are handling the dispute. Helping them to develop the ability to think independently is the most fundamental function of education in safeguarding our democracy.
Hsieh Chia-hao is a teacher at an elementary school in Hualien County.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS