On March 18, 2001, salt-bearing seasonal sea fog led to an insulator flashover at the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County, causing it to experience a total blackout that lasted two hours. The steam-powered cooling system that did not require external electricity was still operational at that time, so the reactor core did not lose its cooling function.
However, the incident clearly exposed the gradual erosion of the plant’s safety margin — an external power failure followed by multiple diesel engine malfunctions left only the steam-powered cooling system operational. Had the blackout lasted any longer, the risk of a core meltdown would have escalated rapidly over time. That two-hour blackout activated multiple layers of backup systems — a real-life example of “hanging by a thread.”
Redundancy systems serve a similar purpose to a reserve parachute — you rely on them in the event that the main one fails. A reserve parachute is designed for use in emergencies — to save lives. That being said, no one would consider a failure of their primary parachute to be a trivial matter just because there was a backup prepared.
Even worse, if the reserve parachute also fails, the result would be fatal — and that is an entirely possible scenario.
The steam-powered cooling system of a nuclear plant is similar. It relies on the decay heat generated after a nuclear reactor shuts down to produce steam, which then drives a turbine to pump water for cooling. While it does not require external electricity, the amount of steam decreases over time as heat gradually dissipates — thus, it is not infinitely reliable. It is designed to buy time, not as a long-term solution.
The point is not to deny that the Ma-anshan plant was ultimately safe during the incident, but to emphasize that when one redundancy system after another gradually collapses, leaving the reserve parachute — the plant’s steam-power cooling system — as the only remaining support, the risk has already neared the very edge.
If that last line of defense were to fail, there would be catastrophic consequences — core meltdown, an explosion from hydrogen accumulation, or even the release and spread of radioactive materials — all of which are serious possibilities.
Jay Hu is a professional in the technology industry with a background in Taiwan’s high-tech sector.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
China’s recent aggressive military posture around Taiwan simply reflects the truth that China is a millennium behind, as Kobe City Councilor Norihiro Uehata has commented. While democratic countries work for peace, prosperity and progress, authoritarian countries such as Russia and China only care about territorial expansion, superpower status and world dominance, while their people suffer. Two millennia ago, the ancient Chinese philosopher Mencius (孟子) would have advised Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that “people are the most important, state is lesser, and the ruler is the least important.” In fact, the reverse order is causing the great depression in China right now,
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
RSS