Following the methodologies of the US Senior Seismic Hazard Analysis Committee, Taiwan Power Co conducted a seismic hazard assessment for the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County. The assessment found that the peak ground acceleration (PGA) — the maximum acceleration of the ground during an earthquake — could reach as much as 1.384g (the acceleration of the Earth’s gravity) — in an earthquake of sufficient magnitude, far exceeding the 0.4g that the facility was designed to withstand. The PGA is higher than the 0.85g at the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power plant in California, 0.488g at the Palisades nuclear plant in Michigan and far greater than the PGA values of nuclear plants in Europe.
With the exceptions of the Diablo Canyon plant, the San Onofre Plant in southern California and the Humboldt Bay Nuclear Power Plant in northern California — which are near fault lines — the majority of the US’ nuclear facilities are in low-seismicity zones. According to data published in 2021 by the World Nuclear Association, the Diablo Canyon plant was designed for PGA of 735Gal. As 1g is about 980Gal, the plant was designed to withstand 0.75g. The San Onofre plant — which was decommissioned in 2013 — was designed for 657Gal (0.67g). The Humboldt Bay plant was fully decommissioned in 2021.
US Nuclear Regulatory Commission information shows that the seismic hazard assessment of the Diablo Canyon plant was also conducted using SSHAC Level 3.
Moreover, research published last year by the Nuclear Safety Commission, Safety Regulatory Technology Research on Probabilistic Seismic Risk Assessment for Nuclear Power Plants (核電廠機率式地震風險評估安全管制技術研究) showed that the PGA the Diablo Canyon plant was designed to withstand was 0.85g.
The Palisades plant is on track to be the first nuclear power facility in the US to restart operations after being decommissioned, but its new PGA is just 0.488g — much lower than even the 0.698g of the Jinshan Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Shihmen District (石門).
While some fault lines in Taiwan have been classified as inactive, many could be recognized as active under Japan’s new regulatory standards. According to Japan’s updated standards, the Ma-anshan plant would not be approved for a license extension.
After the March 11, 2011, earthquake off Japan and the massive tsunami that damaged the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, Tokyo implemented new regulatory requirements for commercial power reactors, with the rules retroactively applied to all of the country’s plants in July 2013. The new framework prohibits the construction of nuclear reactors and other critical facilities on land near active faults.
The regulations also expanded the definition of “active” faults. The original definition was movement in the past 120,000 to 130,000 years. The new rules require that, when there is uncertainty, geological records must be examined going as far back as 400,000 years.
In August last year, the Japanese Nuclear Regulation Authority denied a request to restart the second reactor at the Tsuruga Nuclear Power Plant in Fukui Prefecture due to the risks of an “active” fault.
The geological environment of the Ma-anshan plant is one of the worst among all of the nuclear power plants in the world.
How would Pegatron chairman Tung Tzu-hsien (童子賢) interpret the data? Is he not concerned that, if the Ma-anshan plant’s operating license were to be extended, a major earthquake could trigger a nuclear disaster and the resulting spread of radiation could affect the companies at the Southern Taiwan Science Park?
Wood Fire Yang is director-general of the Association for the Demolition of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Chinese agents often target Taiwanese officials who are motivated by financial gain rather than ideology, while people who are found guilty of spying face lenient punishments in Taiwan, a researcher said on Tuesday. While the law says that foreign agents can be sentenced to death, people who are convicted of spying for Beijing often serve less than nine months in prison because Taiwan does not formally recognize China as a foreign nation, Institute for National Defense and Security Research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) said. Many officials and military personnel sell information to China believing it to be of little value, unaware that
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
The central bank and the US Department of the Treasury on Friday issued a joint statement that both sides agreed to avoid currency manipulation and the use of exchange rates to gain a competitive advantage, and would only intervene in foreign-exchange markets to combat excess volatility and disorderly movements. The central bank also agreed to disclose its foreign-exchange intervention amounts quarterly rather than every six months, starting from next month. It emphasized that the joint statement is unrelated to tariff negotiations between Taipei and Washington, and that the US never requested the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar during the
RSS