In nature, there is a group of insects known as parasitoid wasps. Their reproductive process differs entirely from that of ordinary wasps — the female lays her eggs inside or on the bodies of other insects, and, once hatched, the larvae feed on the host’s body.
The larvae do not kill the host insect immediately; instead, they carefully avoid vital organs, allowing the host to stay alive until the larvae are fully mature. That living reservoir strategy ensures a stable and fresh source of nutrients for the larvae as they grow.
However, the host’s death becomes only a matter of time.
The resemblance between that parasitic strategy and relations between Taiwan and China share a striking resemblance. The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) infiltration and control of Taiwan is a silent parasitic operation.
There is no need to open fire; through information, public opinion, cultural and economic warfare, Beijing has tacitly implanted larvae into Taiwanese society.
These metaphorical larvae take the form of media mouthpieces, political proxies, Internet influencers or even seemingly harmless consumer platforms. Whether it is TikTok, Xiaohongshu (known in English as RedNote), key opinion leaders or Internet memes, the CCP is using a systematic approach to reshape the core values of younger Taiwanese.
Media reports have said that Taiwanese aged 20 to 24 are no longer “naturally independent” — a phrase coined by former Democratic Progressive Party chairperson and veteran activist Lin I-hsiung (林義雄) in his 2014 book The Natural Independence of the Younger Generation (年輕世代的自然獨). Lin used the term to describe how, unlike earlier generations of Taiwanese who struggled against Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) indoctrination, modern Taiwanese have grown up in a society where independence was already a mainstream ideal.
However, that foundation has been eroded by more than a decade of CCP cognitive warfare. Yet after more than eight years of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) rule, has it ever truly been taken seriously? Has there been any significant effort to push back — or is Taiwan paying the price for years of passivity?
The chaos in the Legislative Yuan, the crushing defeat of the recall vote on July 26, the political accountability in the legislature — all of it, alongside the CCP’s escalated intellectual and cognitive warfare, are the result of this parasitic project.
Now, BYD Co’s plan to enter the Taiwan market via transshipment is gaining momentum, turning it into the CCP’s Trojan Horse.
Under the guise of economic priority, circumventing regulatory oversight to import goods is slowly corroding the defenses of Taiwan’s market. Is this not the very process of the larvae burrowing into the host’s body? Why would they even bother with employing external force?
It is not just economic infiltration, but a reshaping of Taiwanese cognition and a softening of willpower. The “enemy is in Honno-ji Temple,” as the saying goes. Taiwan’s society, schools, institutions, military, police, civil servants and even ministries all seem to remain indifferent in a Daliesque daze.
Akin to the famous 1977 Taiwanese romance novel Misty Moons, Misty Birds (月朦朧,鳥朦朧), in which the protagonist becomes enamored with the illusion of an unattainable love, Taiwanese today seem caught in a similar haze of self-disillusionment.
On Saturday, the second wave of recall votes and a referendum on extending the operations of Pingtung County’s Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant are to be held. The recall elections would not only be a decisive assessment of the ruling party, but also a major chance for Taiwanese to declare the direction of the country, uphold democratic values and ensure national safety in the years ahead.
Should Taiwan once again fail to breach the lines of defense, the DPP could face a complete unraveling in the next local elections — and the nation would edge ever closer to a future completely defined, or consumed, by parasitism.
Parasitoid wasps never make a fuss; rather, they stealthily devour the host from within, and if Taiwanese linger in this deep sleep, they might awaken only to find the grim reality that their insides have already been hollowed out, bringing about a quiet, inevitable demise.
History repeatedly warns that every crisis and downfall faced by Taiwan was never attributed to the strength of the enemy, but because of internal wavering, resignation and embracing them.
Today, standing toe-to-toe with a China more adept at subterfuge, propaganda and cross-domain influence warfare, if Taiwan continues to deceive itself with illusions of tranquility, it would once again repeat the tragedy of history.
We cannot wait for the enemy to knock on the gates — because they are already inside the temple.
Jane Ywe-hwan is an associate professor at National Pingtung University.
Translated by Lenna Veronica Suminski
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more