Minister of Health and Welfare Chiu Tai-yuan (邱泰源) on Saturday last week outlined four strategies to address Taiwan’s declining birthrate: reducing the burden of childcare; improving maternal and child health; funding more childcare facilities and public housing for new parents; and encouraging marriage and childbearing. Chiu also floated the idea of promoting matchmaking activities — a proposal that drew swift public criticism.
Separately, Deputy Minister of Health and Welfare Lin Ching-yi (林靜儀) on Wednesday told lawmakers that fostering flexible workplace environments and encouraging men to participate in childcare would help boost the birthrate.
The backlash against Chiu is understandable. The problem is not that people cannot find partners, but that economic pressure and shifting social norms are driving the marriage rate down. For many women, professional success is a more appealing prospect than the traditional role of homemaker.
Careers and children are not mutually exclusive, but raising children inevitably requires time away from work. As Lin said, childcare still falls disproportionately on mothers. Financial costs add another layer of difficulty. The factors that matter most to would-be parents — as Chiu and Lin acknowledged — are housing, daycare and flexible workplaces.
Without affordable housing, young people are unlikely to marry and even less likely to have children. Taiwan’s social housing is already insufficient and prioritizes low-income households, making it difficult for young couples to qualify. Significantly expanding housing for families would require overcoming land shortages, regulatory hurdles, competing government priorities and community resistance. Past administrations have pledged reforms — taxing idle properties, incentivizing landlords — yet housing remains scarce and expensive, especially in major cities.
Even for those who secure housing and have children, finding affordable and accessible daycare is another challenge. The government last year expanded public and quasi-public daycare, but because they operate on a lottery system, many families still cannot get a spot. Private daycare is far costlier and also limited in availability. Compounding the problems is that many couples live far from extended family, having relocated to urban centers for work. With both parents typically employed to meet the high cost of living, access to reliable daycare is essential.
Assuming a family does secure daycare, flexibility at work remains crucial. Children get sick and schools suspend classes, while vaccinations, checkups and school events all demand parents’ time. Without employers who understand, routine interruptions become major obstacles.
The government could encourage flexible workplaces by offering subsidies or tax breaks to companies that allow remote work for parents, create backup staffing systems to cover sudden absences, or provide partially paid leave for either parent to care for their children until affordable daycare is found or the child starts school. Overtime must be strictly voluntary for parents, with an anonymous reporting mechanism — or even surprise audits — to ensure compliance.
The notion that Taiwan’s low birthrate stems from people struggling to meet partners misses the point. It is overwhelmingly a practical issue, driven by housing costs, daycare shortages and rigid workplace norms. Matchmaking events might grab headlines, but they do little to address the real barriers to starting a family.
If the government truly wants to reverse the declining birthrate, its most urgent task is to resolve Taiwan’s housing crisis. Without affordable homes, no amount of policy tinkering — or matchmaking drives — will persuade young couples to take on the financial and personal responsibilities of raising children.
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS