Minister of Health and Welfare Chiu Tai-yuan (邱泰源) on Saturday last week outlined four strategies to address Taiwan’s declining birthrate: reducing the burden of childcare; improving maternal and child health; funding more childcare facilities and public housing for new parents; and encouraging marriage and childbearing. Chiu also floated the idea of promoting matchmaking activities — a proposal that drew swift public criticism.
Separately, Deputy Minister of Health and Welfare Lin Ching-yi (林靜儀) on Wednesday told lawmakers that fostering flexible workplace environments and encouraging men to participate in childcare would help boost the birthrate.
The backlash against Chiu is understandable. The problem is not that people cannot find partners, but that economic pressure and shifting social norms are driving the marriage rate down. For many women, professional success is a more appealing prospect than the traditional role of homemaker.
Careers and children are not mutually exclusive, but raising children inevitably requires time away from work. As Lin said, childcare still falls disproportionately on mothers. Financial costs add another layer of difficulty. The factors that matter most to would-be parents — as Chiu and Lin acknowledged — are housing, daycare and flexible workplaces.
Without affordable housing, young people are unlikely to marry and even less likely to have children. Taiwan’s social housing is already insufficient and prioritizes low-income households, making it difficult for young couples to qualify. Significantly expanding housing for families would require overcoming land shortages, regulatory hurdles, competing government priorities and community resistance. Past administrations have pledged reforms — taxing idle properties, incentivizing landlords — yet housing remains scarce and expensive, especially in major cities.
Even for those who secure housing and have children, finding affordable and accessible daycare is another challenge. The government last year expanded public and quasi-public daycare, but because they operate on a lottery system, many families still cannot get a spot. Private daycare is far costlier and also limited in availability. Compounding the problems is that many couples live far from extended family, having relocated to urban centers for work. With both parents typically employed to meet the high cost of living, access to reliable daycare is essential.
Assuming a family does secure daycare, flexibility at work remains crucial. Children get sick and schools suspend classes, while vaccinations, checkups and school events all demand parents’ time. Without employers who understand, routine interruptions become major obstacles.
The government could encourage flexible workplaces by offering subsidies or tax breaks to companies that allow remote work for parents, create backup staffing systems to cover sudden absences, or provide partially paid leave for either parent to care for their children until affordable daycare is found or the child starts school. Overtime must be strictly voluntary for parents, with an anonymous reporting mechanism — or even surprise audits — to ensure compliance.
The notion that Taiwan’s low birthrate stems from people struggling to meet partners misses the point. It is overwhelmingly a practical issue, driven by housing costs, daycare shortages and rigid workplace norms. Matchmaking events might grab headlines, but they do little to address the real barriers to starting a family.
If the government truly wants to reverse the declining birthrate, its most urgent task is to resolve Taiwan’s housing crisis. Without affordable homes, no amount of policy tinkering — or matchmaking drives — will persuade young couples to take on the financial and personal responsibilities of raising children.
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
RSS