US President Donald Trump has proposed raising tariffs on imported medicines to 150 percent, and potentially to 250 percent, as a way to boost US domestic production. How would such a policy affect Taiwan’s pharmaceutical market?
About 75 percent of medicines in Taiwan are imported. Much less is exported to the US. Many of Taiwan’s biopharmaceutical companies have established operations in the US. If the US government raises tariffs on drug imports, it would benefit these Taiwan-backed US companies to become even more competitive.
In Taiwan, medical institutions apply to the National Health Insurance Administration (NHIA) to register drug prices according to reimbursement benefits and payment standards. These institutions negotiate prices with pharmaceutical companies, often driving them down and squeezing profits. For instance, under the National Health Insurance system, Plavix — a drug used to prevent atherosclerosis — costs NT$36, compared with the equivalent of NT$239 in the US.
If higher tariffs disrupt the global pharmaceutical supply chain by raising costs and reducing output, and if purchase prices in Taiwan remain capped, companies might prioritize selling to higher-margin markets. Under free-market conditions, this could lead to shortages of brand-name drugs in Taiwan.
While brand-name and generic drugs are essentially the same in terms of ingredients, dosage and form, the former carry higher prices due to research and development costs. Generics, produced after patents expire, must still meet the Good Manufacturing Practice standards set by the Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme, ensuring safety and quality equivalent to the originals.
To mitigate the risk of brand-name drug shortages, Taiwan’s pharmaceutical industry must strengthen its capacity to produce generics, reducing reliance on imported brands. Locally manufactured generics could serve as a vital substitute in the event of supply disruptions.
Yeh Yu-cheng is a civil servant at the Public Health Bureau
Translated by Lai Wen-chieh
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
RSS