Several former directors of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County, along with some academics and experts, have launched a petition supporting the extension of the plant’s service life, claiming it has a good safety record. However, the plant has in fact experienced numerous incidents during its 40 years of operation.
On July 7, 1985, less than a year after its No. 1 reactor began commercial operations, a flawed turbine design caused severe vibrations, leading to blade detachment and a hydrogen explosion that sparked a major fire that resulted in a shutdown that lasted one year and two months.
In April 1993, a filter cover in the No. 1 reactor detached due to aging latches, clogged filters, water hammer vibrations and poor design, resulting in 18,927 liters of radioactive wastewater leaking into the South Bay.
In September 1997, a pressure relief diaphragm in the radioactive waste liquid treatment system ruptured, releasing untreated radioactive vapor that deposited on the roof and later washed into rainwater drainage channels.
Between 1994 and 2001, radioactive nuclides were repeatedly detected in drainage ditches near the waste treatment facility.
On March 18, 2001, salt-bearing seasonal sea fog led to an insulator flashover at the plant, causing a ground fault to trip incoming power transmission lines that led to a blackout lasting 2 hours, 8 minutes. The circuit breaker’s insulation failure triggered an electrical fire. Fortunately, the No. 1 reactor was in a low-risk “shutdown” state, averting a nuclear disaster.
The incident was the most severe blackout at a Western light-water reactor at the time, drawing worldwide attention. Taiwan was invited to a regulatory meeting of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Nuclear Energy Agency, where the incident topped the agenda.
The Institute of Nuclear Energy Research said the probability of a core meltdown in the No. 1 reactor during the event was nearly 40 times higher than normal. Salt-bearing sea fog is a natural phenomenon that is difficult to prevent.
On June 12, 2009, a corroded internal insulation layer in a transformer resulted in a fire. Three prior alarms were ignored, leading to a reprimand from the Control Yuan.
On April 26, 2015, an aging ceramic sleeve in the No. 2 reactor’s auxiliary transformer short-circuited a ground fault and caused a fire.
The incidents highlight recurring equipment failures due to aging, which would likely worsen with an extension, increasing risks at the plant.
The plant had also long been incinerating low-level radioactive waste at its on-site reduction center. Radioactive substances, such as strontium-90 and cesium-137, had been detected, posing health risks to the public. Control Yuan members Tien Chiu-chin (田秋堇) and Jao Yung-ching (趙永清) called for a review.
Extending the plant’s operation would prolong public exposure to such risks.
During the major maintenance, various mishaps have occurred at the plant, including stuck hex bolts, bolt fractures, a bolt and disc ejecting and injuring a contractor, a bent control rod drive shaft, fuel rod fractures, and foreign objects, such as lampshades, glass thermometers and bolts, falling into the reactor.
Such incidents are just the tip of the iceberg. The plant’s checkered history makes it unworthy of risking lives to extend its service life.
Tsai Ya-ying is an attorney for the Wild at Heart Legal Defense Association.
Translated by Fion Khan
The fallout from the mass recalls and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant continues to monopolize the news. The general consensus is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been bloodied and found wanting, and is in need of reflection and a course correction if it is to avoid electoral defeat. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not emerged unscathed, either, but has the opportunity of making a relatively clean break. That depends on who the party on Oct. 18 picks to replace outgoing KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). What is certain is that, with the dust settling
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Shen You-chung (沈有忠) on Thursday last week urged democratic nations to boycott China’s military parade on Wednesday next week. The parade, a grand display of Beijing’s military hardware, is meant to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II. While China has invited world leaders to attend, many have declined. A Kyodo News report on Sunday said that Japan has asked European and Asian leaders who have yet to respond to the invitation to refrain from attending. Tokyo is seeking to prevent Beijing from spreading its distorted interpretation of wartime history, the report
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
RSS