Sports science plays a critical role in enhancing athletes’ competitive performance and safeguarding their health. Systematic data monitoring and precise analysis can be used to help athletes make effective and science-based training adjustments to improve their speed, explosiveness, muscle strength, aerobic endurance and agility, thereby enhancing overall competitiveness.
The controversial research project at National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU) — in which current and former members of the women’s soccer team revealed they were coerced into giving blood samples three times per day for periods of 14 days over the course of several years and threatened with failure should they refuse to comply — was originally intended to fulfill this mission, helping athletes grow and achieve breakthroughs in performance.
However, upon reading the reports published by project leader Chen Chung-ching (陳忠慶), long-time women’s varsity soccer coach Chou Tai-ying (周台英), associate professor Tseng Wei-chin (曾暐晉) and others at NTNU, I felt disappointed and concerned. Despite the research projects being carried out over a span of five years — from 2019 to last year — they lacked evidence of any significant improvements in key physical performance indicators among the subjects and provide no timely or actionable training feedback.
Such insufficient outcomes highlight deep-rooted issues in project design, implementation and management, and indicate a serious flaw — an unclear division of responsibilities between the principal investigator and the team responsible for executing research.
In terms of quality and outcomes, Chen’s projects fell short of required standards. There were no reasonable or observable improvements in the athletes’ physical performance indicators, such as speed, explosiveness, muscular strength, aerobic endurance and agility. Furthermore, the projects failed to provide specific and actionable training recommendations. Such poor research results are not only a waste of precious national resources, but an erosion of academic integrity, damaging the hopes of athletes and teams striving to make progress.
With regard to day-to-day execution of the projects, technical operations were primarily handled by graduate students such as Chou and Tseng, who were responsible for their overall implementation. However, research design, project management and supervision should have been part of Chen’s core responsibilities. The roles of the different parties involved in a project should not be obfuscated — excessive pressure and responsibility should never be placed on those responsible for implementation, nor should those team members be made scapegoats for broader failures in leadership and oversight.
Despite delivering poor and underwhelming results, this series of research projects repeatedly received funding from the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC), given an annual budget of about NT$9 million (US$301,457). This points to structural issues within the NSTC’s review mechanisms, including a lack of transparency and the presence of conflicts of interest. Conveners of some review committees might have close ties with research teams applying for funding — and thus essentially act as both player and referee — which compromises the fairness and impartiality of the evaluation process. As time has passed, specific cliques have formed within the intellectual community and monopolized research resources, severely hindering the development of cross-disciplinary collaboration with new generations of academics — a phenomenon that has led to a vicious cycle detrimental to the overall research environment in the field of sports science.
The aforementioned issues have dealt a serious blow to the healthy development of sports science and the meaningful development of athletes in Taiwan, giving rise to systemic barriers. There is an urgent need for the authorities to conduct an earnest and thorough review, and implement fundamental reforms to the current review and oversight mechanisms of scientific research projects.
These changes should include, but not be limited to — stricter regulations surrounding conflicts of interest, establishing a more transparent and diverse review process, limiting the number of concurrent projects that can be held by a single principal investigator to prevent repeated applications and a waste of resources, and strictly enforcing research ethics reviews to protect the rights and interests of research subjects. Such measures would ensure that research results are scientifically valuable and practical.
Fundamental and systemic reform is needed to eliminate the vicious cycle of funding misuse followed by poor results in research and development. Only then could we ensure that the nation’s resources are being invested toward research that truly enhances Taiwan’s sports competitiveness. The case of the NTNU women’s soccer team should alarm the sports and academic communities. The authorities must strengthen oversight and accountability, and thoroughly avoid instances of blurred responsibilities and misallocated resources, so that the nation’s future of sports science research can develop in a healthy and positive direction.
Chang Ray-tai is a retired professor of physical education.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
Heavy rains over the past week have overwhelmed southern and central Taiwan, with flooding, landslides, road closures, damage to property and the evacuations of thousands of people. Schools and offices were closed in some areas due to the deluge throughout the week. The heavy downpours brought by the southwest monsoon are a second blow to a region still recovering from last month’s Typhoon Danas. Strong winds and significant rain from the storm inflicted more than NT$2.6 billion (US$86.6 million) in agricultural losses, and damaged more than 23,000 roofs and a record high of nearly 2,500 utility poles, causing power outages. As
It is difficult to think of an issue that has monopolized political commentary as intensely as the recall movement and the autopsy of the July 26 failures. These commentaries have come from diverse sources within Taiwan and abroad, from local Taiwanese members of the public and academics, foreign academics resident in Taiwan, and overseas Taiwanese working in US universities. There is a lack of consensus that Taiwan’s democracy is either dying in ashes or has become a phoenix rising from the ashes, nurtured into existence by civic groups and rational voters. There are narratives of extreme polarization and an alarming
RSS